<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-9"?>
			<rss version="2.0">
			  <channel>
				<title>Darwinism-Watch</title>
				<link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com</link>
				<description>Last 10 Articles</description>
				<language>EN</language>
		  <item>
					  <title>Why Do Defenders Of Creation Who Say The Earth Is 4.5 Billion Years Old Disturb Darwinists So Much?</title>
					  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=1940</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[Christian defenders of Creation have for years been claiming that the Earth is 6000 years old. Darwinists, who imagined that this played right into their hands, have recently been dealt a new body blow. Adnan Oktar&amp;#8217;s (Harun Yahya) stating in his works that the data show that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old and his showing, with supporting evidence, that the life on it is the work of Almighty Allah, was one of the heaviest blows dealt to Darwinism.]]></description>
					  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
					  <pubDate>2010-03-08</pubDate>
					</item>  <item>
					  <title>A 165-Million-Year-Old Fossil Spider Found In China</title>
					  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=1937</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[A 165-million-year-old fossil spider discovered in the Daohugou region of Northern China is one of the oldest fossil spider specimens found to date.]]></description>
					  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
					  <pubDate>2010-02-17</pubDate>
					</item>  <item>
					  <title>Why Are Darwinists Still Resorting To False Dino-Bird Myths?</title>
					  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=1935</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[The reason is this: On the one hand, Darwinists are suffering the tension caused by their terrible rout and collapse, while on the other they are sheltering behind a philosophy of &amp;#8220;nothing untoward has happened.&amp;#8221; For that reason, they try to portray some fossils that fall into their hands in a deceptive light. This generally involves an extinct ape fossil, but sometimes also a dinosaur fossil, the original of which we have never seen in any Darwinist publication. They then blatantly lie about this fossil, using a false &amp;#8220;scientific&amp;#8221; mask and drawings made showing it flying with huge, long wings to describe it as a dino-bird.]]></description>
					  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
					  <pubDate>2010-02-04</pubDate>
					</item>  <item>
					  <title>Unable to Account for a Single Protein, Darwinists Now Place Their Hopes in Fossilized Footprints</title>
					  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=1916</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[Unable to Account for a Single Protein, Darwinists Now Place Their Hopes in Fossilized Footprints]]></description>
					  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
					  <pubDate>2010-01-13</pubDate>
					</item>  <item>
					  <title>Deceptions Regarding Prion Proteins Will Not Save Despairing Darwinists</title>
					  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=1914</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[A report that recently appeared on various web sites such as the BBC, Science, Scientific American, Discover and CBS claimed that &amp;#8220;inanimate prions evolved.&amp;#8221;  This utterly illogical claim was portrayed as a major scientific discovery in the reports in question, and statements liberally adorned with scientific terminology were laid out one after the other just as they were established fact. As always, the aim was to deceive the majority of people with no knowledge of what prions actually]]></description>
					  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
					  <pubDate>2010-01-11</pubDate>
					</item>  <item>
					  <title>Protein Cannot Form Unless The Cell Exists As An Integral Whole</title>
					  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=1907</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists can write as many deceptive books jam packed with formulae, produce as many false fossils as they like, make as many demagogic assaults on the scientific evidence for Creation as they choose or stick posters up full of fantastical illustrations and present these as exhibitions of evolution all over the place, but none of this will ever change the fact of their fundamental defeat. Because the worst nightmare for Darwinists is the very beginning of life. Darwinists HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO PRODUCE A SINGLE EXPLANATION of how just one protein came into being. This is an expression of the despairing situation into which, Dawkins, Futuyma, Tim White and all other Darwinists now find themselves. None of this demagoguery can resolve this great and stupendous rout in the face of a single protein. A SINGLE PROTEIN HAS TOTALLY DEMOLISHED DARWINISM.]]></description>
					  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
					  <pubDate>2009-12-29</pubDate>
					</item>  <item>
					  <title>Darwinists Who Fail To Grasp The Wisdom Behind The Creation Of Imperfections By Allah, Al-Badi</title>
					  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=1893</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[&amp;#8220;Badi&amp;#8221;, is one of the names of Almighty Allah. It means &amp;#8220;HE WHO CREATES UNIQUE AND ASTONISHING WORLDS.&amp;#8221; 
 
Some people are unable to grasp this]]></description>
					  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
					  <pubDate>2009-12-12</pubDate>
					</item>  <item>
					  <title>Darwinists: ''We Apologize Once Again, We Were Also Mistaken About Ardi''</title>
					  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=1892</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists have had to keep apologizing for the last 150 years; &amp;#8220;sorry, that was a hoax,&amp;#8221; they said, &amp;#8220;our mistake, it was a pig tooth, not a human one,&amp;#8221; they said, &amp;#8220;sorry about that, the moths were deliberately stuck onto the trees,&amp;#8221; &amp;#8220;the skull had been planed down,&amp;#8221; &amp;#8220;feathers had been stuck onto the dinosaur by hand,&amp;#8221; &amp;#8220;it appears that this fossil is still alive and not an intermediate form at all,&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;the primordial atmosphere was not like that at all,&amp;#8221; they said. &amp;#8220;Embryos are not like this at all, the illustrations are fakes,&amp;#8221; they said. &amp;#8220;We said it was the ancestor of man, but it appears it was just an ordinary ape,&amp;#8221; they said. They have kept on apologizing and retracting their claims. They have hurriedly withdrawn fossils from museums. Declaring something to be an intermediate fossil in one issue of a journal, they have issued an apology in the subsequent edition. And this has carried on right down to the present day.]]></description>
					  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
					  <pubDate>2009-12-12</pubDate>
					</item>  <item>
					  <title>Haeckel's Embryo Drawings Are Fraudulent</title>
					  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=1889</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[In his 1868 book Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte (The History of Natural Creation) Ernst Haeckel suggested that he had made various comparisons using human, monkey and dog embryos. The drawings he produced consisted of nearly identical embryos. On the basis of these drawings, Haeckel then suggested that the life forms involved had common origins.]]></description>
					  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
					  <pubDate>2009-11-26</pubDate>
					</item>  <item>
					  <title>The Evolution of the Horse Series Is a Fraud</title>
					  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=1888</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[In 1879, two well-known evolutionists of the time went even further in their activities intended to constitute evidence for the fictitious evolution of the horse scenario and set up the equine series that Darwinists would maintain on the agenda for many years to come. The American fossil researcher Othniel Charles Marsh and Thomas Huxley (known as Darwin&amp;#8217;s bulldog) established a series by setting out various hoofed fossils on the number of nails on the front and rear feet and the structure of their teeth. One small mammal fossil previously named Hyracotherium by Sir Richard Owen in 1841 was renamed in such a way as to echo evolution, being given the name Eohippus, meaning &amp;#8220;Dawn Horse.&amp;#8221; The pair published their claims and diagrams in the American Journal of Science, thus laying the foundations of the horse series laid out from Eohippus to the present day in museums and text books as supposed evidence of evolution.]]></description>
					  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
					  <pubDate>2009-11-24</pubDate>
					</item>  </channel>
		</rss>