<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
				<rss version="2.0">
				  <channel>
					<title>Darwinism-Watch</title>
					<link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com</link>
					<description>Last 10 Articles</description>
					<language>EN</language>
			  <item>
						  <title>Channels That Only Show Animals&#8217; Savage Aspects Are Engaging in Darwinist Propaganda</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148618</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Channels That Only Show Animals&amp;#8217; Savage Aspects Are Engaging in Darwinist Propaganda]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2012-04-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Perfection Is an Outcome Shown by Science and Prevails in All Living Structures</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148616</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Perfection Is an Outcome Shown by Science and Prevails in All Living Structures]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2012-03-28</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>There Is No Such Thing as the &#8220;First Self-reproducing Molecule That Gave Rise to Life&#8221;</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148614</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[There Is No Such Thing as the &amp;#8220;First Self-reproducing Molecule That Gave Rise to Life&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2012-03-28</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Response To The Darwinist Deceptions In The News Site Malaysian Insider</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148612</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Response To The Darwinist Deceptions In The News Site Malaysian Insider]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2012-03-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Prof. Robert Davis, from Glasgow University, warned that the Scottish curriculum is &#8220;under pressure&#8221; of atheists like Richard Dawkins</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148610</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Prof. Robert Davis, from Glasgow University, warned that the Scottish curriculum is &amp;#8220;under pressure&amp;#8221; of atheists like Richard Dawkins]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2012-02-29</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Huffington Post Writer Nidhal Guessoum&#8217;s Errors Concerning Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148608</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Huffington Post Writer Nidhal Guessoum&amp;#8217;s Errors Concerning Evolution]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2012-01-18</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Fearing death will avail CNN producer Larry King nothing at all</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148606</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Fearing death will avail CNN producer Larry King nothing at all]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2012-02-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The error of Al Jazeera TV"s claim that evolution and religion might be reconciled must be made up for right away</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148602</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The error of Al Jazeera TV"s claim that evolution and religion might be reconciled must be made up for right away]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2012-01-03</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why are Darwinist journals ceasing publication one after the other?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148597</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Why are Darwinist journals ceasing publication one after the other?]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-06-19</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Tales of  ""Feathered Dinosaurs""  No Longer Deceive Anyone</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148596</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Tales of &amp;#8220;Feathered Dinosaurs&amp;#8221; No Longer Deceive Anyone]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-06-18</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Myth of the Evolution of Fish with Lungs</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148594</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Myth of the Evolution of Fish with Lungs]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-06-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>No Darwinist is really a Darwinist at all</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148593</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[It is the Darwinist ideology they fall prey to that causes some people to remain faithful to all this illogicality. The perverse theory of evolution was developed for the sole purpose of being able to deny the existence of Allah (surely Allah is beyond that) ever since ancient Sumerian and Egyptian times. And that is the only reason for its continued survival. It is impossible for such a nonsensical theory to be espoused or to be imposed on whole societies for any other reason.

But there may also from time to time be people]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-06-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The invalidity of the claim that ""objecting to evolution stems from a standard psychological unease""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148592</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The invalidity of the claim that ""objecting to evolution stems from a standard psychological unease""]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-06-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The claim that Darwin was a scientist and evolution is a science</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148591</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The claim that Darwin was a scientist and evolution is a science]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-29</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The true face of the claim that ""everyone in the world believes in evolution""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148590</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The true face of the claim that ""everyone in the world believes in evolution""]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-29</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The invalidity of claims regarding ""deep impact""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148589</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The invalidity of claims regarding &amp;#8220;deep impact&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-29</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The invalidity of the claim that ""transitional forms do not mean deformed living things""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148588</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The invalidity of the claim that &amp;#8220;transitional forms do not mean deformed living things&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The invalidity of the famous Darwinist claim that ""useful mutations do exist.""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148587</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The invalidity of the famous Darwinist claim that &amp;#8220;useful mutations do exist.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-20</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The invalidity of the claim that ""the fossils known as transitional forms have been retracted because better ones have been found""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148586</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The invalidity of the claim that &amp;#8220;the fossils known as transitional forms have been retracted because better ones have been found&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-20</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The invalidity of the claim that ""moral understanding exists from birth, you cannot ignore an actively existing concept""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148585</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The invalidity of the claim that &amp;#8220;moral understanding exists from birth, you cannot ignore an actively existing concept&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-17</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The invalidity of the claim that ""RNA is the forebear of life""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148584</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The invalidity of the claim that &amp;#8220;RNA is the forebear of life&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-17</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The invalidity of he claim that ""the probability calculations regarding protein formation are wrong""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148583</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The invalidity of he claim that &amp;#8220;the probability calculations regarding protein formation are wrong&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-17</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Responses to the claim that peptide bonds can be established in the laboratory</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148582</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Responses to the claim that peptide bonds can be established in the laboratory]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-16</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The invalidity of the claim that ""the fact that species may change little or not at all does not disprove evolution""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148581</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This is what Darwinists say when faced with fossil evidence that has never undergone any change. Such glorious fossil evidence so demolished evolution that Darwinists think they can remedy the situation and close the subject by claiming that some species have never changed.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-16</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The invalidity of the claim that ""evolution has nothing to do with chance""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148580</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The invalidity of the claim that &amp;#8220;evolution has nothing to do with chance&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-16</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A response to the claim that ""If students do not learn about evolution they can never learn about the diversity in nature""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148579</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A response to the claim that &amp;#8220;If students do not learn about evolution they can never learn about the diversity in nature&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A response to the claim that ""nobody objects to scientific theories, only to evolution""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148578</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A response to the claim that &amp;#8221;nobody objects to scientific theories, only to evolution&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-05-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists have for a long time espoused the demagogic idea that ""a person can be an evolutionist at the same time as being a believer.""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148577</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists have for a long time espoused the demagogic idea that &amp;#8220;a person can be an evolutionist at the same time as being a believer.&amp;#8221; 
As we have made clear many times before, this Darwinist claim is a huge deception. EVOLUTION REQUIRES LACK OF BELIEF. Evolution is a pagan religion launched in order to turn people away from belief in Allah and TO SPREAD IRRELIGION. As with all pagan religions, the struggle against belief in Allah predominates in the pagan religion that is Darwinism (Surely Allah is beyond that.) 
The sole reason why this fraud, the]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-04-30</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why does the possibility of the fact of Creation being taught in schools alarm Darwinists?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148576</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Although Darwinism is a fraud and total lie, we have no objection to evolution being taught in our schools. However, if evolution is to be taught in schools, THE FACT OF CREATION SHOULD BE TAUGHT AT THE SAME TIME. 
Darwinists are terrified by that possibility. They claim that Creation should never, ever be allowed onto the curriculum, and the very idea makes them extraordinarily unease. That is the reason why various schools and teachers have been sued in America.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-04-30</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A response to the claim that ""nobody would be upset if it were lions or tigers, rather than monkeys""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148575</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Some Darwinists maintain that evolution is rejected as a matter of pride and that the problem lies in the fictitious ancestor being a monkey, and that there would be no problem if people were told &amp;#8220;your ancestors were lions or tigers.&amp;#8221; But that is a grave error.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-04-30</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists" Latest Tactics: Feeble Stories of A Punished Darwinist Teacher, an Apologetic Darwinist Imam and So-Called ""Wronged Darwinism""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148574</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists&amp;#8217; Latest Tactics: Feeble Stories of A Punished Darwinist Teacher, an Apologetic Darwinist Imam and So-Called &amp;#8220;Wronged Darwinism&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-03-18</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Response to the Huffington Post: Evolution as well as creation should be taught in schools</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148558</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Response to the Huffington Post: Evolution As Well as Creation Should Be Taught in Schools.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2011-01-04</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why these constant efforts to use Denisovan fossils as a vehicle for evolutionary propaganda?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148556</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[What is it that induced Darwinists, whose lies have been constantly exposed for years now and who have thus been totally belittled and humiliated, to keep telling the same lies? The reason, of course, is their despair, defeatism and lack of any other way out.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-12-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>What do Darwinists generally use to deceive people?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148554</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[What do Darwinists generally use to deceive people?]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-12-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwin is the universal acid that affects everything, by Jerry Bergman, PhD</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148550</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwin is the universal acid that affects everything, by Jerry Bergman, PhD]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-12-20</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Archaeoraptor Dino-bird forgery exposed by Jerry Bergman, PhD</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148549</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The history of the brief life of the Archaeoraptor forgery was reviewed. The claim that the fossil was a dinosaur-bird transitional form consisting of a bird-like body and a dinosaur-like posterior turned out to be a fake. The forgery illustrates some of the difficulties of interpreting the history of life from teeth and bones. It also illustrates how easy it is to fool the authorities, although in this case the forgery was so poorly done that it was exposed within a matter of months.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-12-20</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why have Darwinists been silent for so long?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148548</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Why have Darwinists been silent for so long?]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-12-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Atheist masons have explicitly stated their support for Darwinism in their own official publications</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148543</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Atheist masons have explicitly stated their support for Darwinism in their own official publications]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-12-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists do not submit to Allah out of arrogance</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148542</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists do not submit to allah out of arrogance]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-12-04</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Science is anti-Darwinist, anti-atheist</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148541</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[SCIENCE IS THE ENEMY OF DARWINISM. SCIENCE IS AGAINST DARWINISM. SCIENCE IS ANTI-COMMUNIST, ANTI-MARXIST. SCIENCE DESTROYS THE MARXIST, ATHEIST AND DARWINIST THOUGHT. It is with science that the Darwinist deceit hascollapsed. It is science that has given the Darwinist propaganda the biggest blow. Science has defeated the evolutionist deceit that has been suggested to the masses for years. Science has destroyed the foundation of the atheist philosophy. Science anhiliates and destroys Darwinism wherever it goes, wherever it becomes a current issue and wherever it shows itself. Therefore, SCIENCE IS ANTI-PAGAN. Science eradicated pagan thoughts, superstitious religions, and false ideologies. Therefore, SCIENCE IS ONE OF THE GREATEST PAINS FOR DARWINISTS.Displaying darwinism as science is part of the ugly game that is being played around the world. The system of the anti-christ,which needs a new religion in order to eradicate the belief in Allah from the world (Allah is beyond that), identified the most effective method of hypnosis years ago through the use of science. The system of the anti-christhas realized that it can deceive people, reach the whole world and occupy the key posts in education systems by making use of science for its deception.  Furthermoreit can realize all of its false pretences in the name of science. The mass hypnosis employed by the system of the anti-christ throughout the world has been extended in the name of science.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-10-18</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The false feathered Dinosaur Concavenator corcovatus and the endless deceptive speculation from Darwinists</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148540</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Non-existent feathered dinosaurs, non-existent half-man and half-ape creatures, life forms that supposedly emerged from water onto dry land and the missing links that have never ever been found are some of the evolutionist frauds that have been imposed on the public for many, many years. Whenever Darwinists panic, whenever they realize that the theory of evolution is heading for total collapse and whenever they grasp the fact they have been defeated, they come up with a new transitional form myth. They impose the idea of a fin growing a 1.5-mm bump, for instance, a feather in the process of development or a finger supposedly becoming vestigial... The proponents of the theory of evolution, that for years has only managed to survive with demagoguery and fraud instead of science, are still trying to persist with the same techniques. All they need is a little speculation and a little help from the press.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why is NTV so willing to embarrass itself with such nonsense as &#8220;We evolved while cooking meat&#8221;?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148538</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[As we all know, the world has been held captive by atheist masons and atheist Zionists&amp;#8217; wide-ranging and organized plans and Darwinist propaganda for the last century and a half. Through this comprehensive propaganda, institutions of state had to defend the heretical theory of evolution, schools had to teach it and teachers had to instruct their students in it, despite not believing it themselves. So shamelessly has this propaganda been disseminated that despite the theory of evolution being an astonishingly false and irrational lie, some people have been put in the willing or unwilling position of vigorously espousing this primitive thesis.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-08-20</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists must first answer these questions about missing link frauds</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148535</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists must first answer these questions about missing link frauds]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-07-30</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why is National Geographic magazine so unhappy at the exposure of Ardi?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148533</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Turkish edition of National Geographic magazine devoted its July 2010 issue to Ardi, one of Darwinists&amp;#8217; great disappointments. Although the whole world now knows that Ardi is a fraud National Geographic&amp;#8217;s endeavors on behalf of evolution have of course led to various points regarding that fraud to be raised once again:]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-07-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>How was Tiktaalik roseae turned into a false intermediate fossil by Darwinists?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148531</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Many aspects of the Darwinist deception regarding Tiktaalik Roseae, for long years the subject of speculation by Darwinists, have been exposed. Darwinist fraud, which we have maintained on the agenda so many times, has once again been revealed with new aspects. It has again been seen that people are being misled by Darwinists; TIKTAALIK ROSEAE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A SPECIES OF ALLIGATOR]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-07-17</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Darwinist deception of ""The number of chromosomes declined from 48 to 46""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148529</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The idea that Darwinists have been expressing for some time now, that &amp;#8220;the 48 chromosomes in apes gradually declined to 46 through the fusion of two chromosomes and human beings were the result may be highly misleading for some people. Because although this account is extraordinarily illogical in scientific terms, it is also exceedingly simple and may convince people who lack adequate knowledge of the subject. Because such people will be unaware that a single gene possesses an extraordinary complexity and is far too sensitive to permit any random change or transition. The really important thing is that these people do not know that DARWINISTS ARE UNABLE TO ACCOUNT FOR THE EMERGENCE OF EVEN A SINGLE PROTEIN.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-07-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Behaving like hooligans instead of science is all Darwinists can do</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148527</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists fear science. They are terrified that the truths revealed by science will be realized, known and spread across the world. The reason for this is that everything about science has demolished and invalidated the theory of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-06-09</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Genome Research Is Demolishing the ""First Cell That Formed by Chance"" Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148525</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The theory of evolution maintains, on the basis of no scientific foundation whatsoever, that at a time when there was still no life on Earth, inanimate substances came together to give rise to the first living organism. According to this evolutionist claim, the first living organism must have had a sufficiently simple structure to have been able to form by chance.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-05-28</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists have also failed to deceive people over the Neanderthals</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148524</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[For years, Darwinists claimed that apes were the supposed ancestors of man and that these were divided into various categories depending on their developmental characteristics. By establishing imaginary sequences such as Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, Neanderthal and Homo sapiens they attempted to give the impression that man gradually tried to walk upright, that his brain and abilities developed gradually and that he became more human as he left his ape-like characteristics behind. For years they strove to deceive people using imaginary pictures and reconstructions.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-05-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists" ""Artificial Life"" Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148507</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report emphasized in Darwinist publications of late has entered the mainstream agenda. One part of an artificially manufactured DNA molecule was transferred to the nucleus of another cell and this DNA was observed to function within the cell. This subject, carried under misleading captions such as &amp;#8220;synthetic genome brings new life to bacterium&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;creation of a bacterial cell&amp;#8221; (surely Allah is beyond that) in various Darwinist publications has been made the tool of Darwinist speculation. Certain publications such as the Financial Times have even claimed that evolutionists have realized their endless dreams regarding creating life out of nothing. The fact is that the research in question represents no reply to the question of how life began,]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-05-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Repairer DNA Precludes Evolutionists&#8217; Mutation Scenarios</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148501</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The faithful duplication and repair exhibited by the double-stranded DNA structure would seem to be incompatible with the process of evolution. Thus, evolution has been explained by the occurrence of "errors" during DNA replication and repair.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-05-03</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolution Theory Cannot Explain How Life Originated</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148500</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[...Origin-of-life researchers cannot identify any location on primordial Earth suitable for production of prebiotic molecules. Those studying the problems cannot explain how the uniform &amp;#8220;handedness&amp;#8221; (homochirality) of amino acids, nucleotides, and sugars could emerge in any so-called prebiotic soup. 
Data from the geological, geochemical, and fossil records all place impossible constraints on naturalistic scenarios. Life arose rapidly and early in Earth&amp;#8217;s history - as soon as Earth could possibly support it. Origin-of-life researchers recognize that life had no more than tens of millions of years to emerge. Life also appeared under amazingly harsh conditions &amp;#8211; conditions that would not allow life to survive, let alone originate.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-05-03</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The question Darwinism and materialism will never be able to answer: What is the origin of life?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148498</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Currently scientists stand no closer to understanding life&amp;#8217;s beginning than they did when Stanley Miller conducted his first experiments fifty years ago. Though some scientists assert that the research is in its infancy, significant resources have been brought to bear on the origin of life question over the past five decades. To date, no real answers have emerged. Rather, a misguided approach has essentially stalled the research program.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-04-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A second embarrassing Ardi case for Darwinists: Australopithecus Sediba</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148497</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[We recently discussed a fictitious transitional form fossil that has hit the headlines in Darwinist publications. Readers will recall how all Darwinist publications across the world published detailed pictures concerning this fossil, before the life form involved had even been announced, before the discovered parts had been shown to the public and before any information about it had been provided. They probably thought that propaganda before the fossil was unveiled would create excitement and arouse curiosity, or else would be more credible. Our reply to these false claims set out how the idea in question was mere speculation and that we would provide a more detailed response once detail concerning the discovery was available. There follows statements about the fossil published in Science magazine following wide-ranging conjecture and the invalidity of the Darwinist claims on the subject.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-04-13</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why Are Darwinists So Determined to Humiliate Themselves?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148495</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Why is it that Darwinists, already in a state of grave disappointment due to the collapse of their theory in recent years in particular, humiliate themselves in such a determined manner? Although all their trickery has been exposed and people have been made aware of how they were deceived by propaganda and demagoguery, though it has been shown, with supporting evidence, that not a single transitional form fossil exists, although 300 million fossils have eliminated the theory entirely and, most important of all, it has been revealed how they are unable to account for the formation of even a single protein, how is it they are able to keep raising the same old claims?]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-04-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>He Claim That "Neanderthals Are The Ape-Like Ancestors Of Man" Is Fraudulent</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148493</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists employed the same technique they used with Australopithecus for the Neanderthals, an extinct human race.

Neanderthal Man entered the scientific literature with the discovery in 1856 of fossils in the Neander Valley near the German city of Düsseldorf. The curvatures in its skull and bones led it being regarded by evolutionists as a supposed primitive human species.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-12-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Risking Humiliation over Their Speculation on a Single Fossil Pinky Finger</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148490</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinist publications recently and again collectively carried headline pictures of a very interesting-looking life form. This odd creature in the imaginary picture below was heralded to the entire world as a &amp;#8220;third species.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-03-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why Do Defenders Of Creation Who Say The Earth Is 4.5 Billion Years Old Disturb Darwinists So Much?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148488</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Christian defenders of Creation have for years been claiming that the Earth is 6000 years old. Darwinists, who imagined that this played right into their hands, have recently been dealt a new body blow. Adnan Oktar&amp;#8217;s (Harun Yahya) stating in his works that the data show that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old and his showing, with supporting evidence, that the life on it is the work of Almighty Allah, was one of the heaviest blows dealt to Darwinism.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-03-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A 165-Million-Year-Old Fossil Spider Found In China</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148485</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A 165-million-year-old fossil spider discovered in the Daohugou region of Northern China is one of the oldest fossil spider specimens found to date.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-02-17</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why Are Darwinists Still Resorting To False Dino-Bird Myths?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148483</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The reason is this: On the one hand, Darwinists are suffering the tension caused by their terrible rout and collapse, while on the other they are sheltering behind a philosophy of &amp;#8220;nothing untoward has happened.&amp;#8221; For that reason, they try to portray some fossils that fall into their hands in a deceptive light. This generally involves an extinct ape fossil, but sometimes also a dinosaur fossil, the original of which we have never seen in any Darwinist publication. They then blatantly lie about this fossil, using a false &amp;#8220;scientific&amp;#8221; mask and drawings made showing it flying with huge, long wings to describe it as a dino-bird.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-02-04</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Unable to Account for a Single Protein, Darwinists Now Place Their Hopes in Fossilized Footprints</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148465</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Unable to Account for a Single Protein, Darwinists Now Place Their Hopes in Fossilized Footprints]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-01-13</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Deceptions Regarding Prion Proteins Will Not Save Despairing Darwinists</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148463</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report that recently appeared on various web sites such as the BBC, Science, Scientific American, Discover and CBS claimed that &amp;#8220;inanimate prions evolved.&amp;#8221;  This utterly illogical claim was portrayed as a major scientific discovery in the reports in question, and statements liberally adorned with scientific terminology were laid out one after the other just as they were established fact. As always, the aim was to deceive the majority of people with no knowledge of what prions actually]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2010-01-11</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Protein Cannot Form Unless The Cell Exists As An Integral Whole</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148456</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists can write as many deceptive books jam packed with formulae, produce as many false fossils as they like, make as many demagogic assaults on the scientific evidence for Creation as they choose or stick posters up full of fantastical illustrations and present these as exhibitions of evolution all over the place, but none of this will ever change the fact of their fundamental defeat. Because the worst nightmare for Darwinists is the very beginning of life. Darwinists HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO PRODUCE A SINGLE EXPLANATION of how just one protein came into being. This is an expression of the despairing situation into which, Dawkins, Futuyma, Tim White and all other Darwinists now find themselves. None of this demagoguery can resolve this great and stupendous rout in the face of a single protein. A SINGLE PROTEIN HAS TOTALLY DEMOLISHED DARWINISM.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-12-29</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Who Fail To Grasp The Wisdom Behind The Creation Of Imperfections By Allah, Al-Badi</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148442</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[&amp;#8220;Badi&amp;#8221;, is one of the names of Almighty Allah. It means &amp;#8220;HE WHO CREATES UNIQUE AND ASTONISHING WORLDS.&amp;#8221; 
 
Some people are unable to grasp this]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-12-12</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists: ""We Apologize Once Again, We Were Also Mistaken About Ardi""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148441</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists have had to keep apologizing for the last 150 years; &amp;#8220;sorry, that was a hoax,&amp;#8221; they said, &amp;#8220;our mistake, it was a pig tooth, not a human one,&amp;#8221; they said, &amp;#8220;sorry about that, the moths were deliberately stuck onto the trees,&amp;#8221; &amp;#8220;the skull had been planed down,&amp;#8221; &amp;#8220;feathers had been stuck onto the dinosaur by hand,&amp;#8221; &amp;#8220;it appears that this fossil is still alive and not an intermediate form at all,&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;the primordial atmosphere was not like that at all,&amp;#8221; they said. &amp;#8220;Embryos are not like this at all, the illustrations are fakes,&amp;#8221; they said. &amp;#8220;We said it was the ancestor of man, but it appears it was just an ordinary ape,&amp;#8221; they said. They have kept on apologizing and retracting their claims. They have hurriedly withdrawn fossils from museums. Declaring something to be an intermediate fossil in one issue of a journal, they have issued an apology in the subsequent edition. And this has carried on right down to the present day.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-12-12</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Haeckel"s Embryo Drawings Are Fraudulent</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148438</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In his 1868 book Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte (The History of Natural Creation) Ernst Haeckel suggested that he had made various comparisons using human, monkey and dog embryos. The drawings he produced consisted of nearly identical embryos. On the basis of these drawings, Haeckel then suggested that the life forms involved had common origins.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-11-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Evolution of the Horse Series Is a Fraud</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148437</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In 1879, two well-known evolutionists of the time went even further in their activities intended to constitute evidence for the fictitious evolution of the horse scenario and set up the equine series that Darwinists would maintain on the agenda for many years to come. The American fossil researcher Othniel Charles Marsh and Thomas Huxley (known as Darwin&amp;#8217;s bulldog) established a series by setting out various hoofed fossils on the number of nails on the front and rear feet and the structure of their teeth. One small mammal fossil previously named Hyracotherium by Sir Richard Owen in 1841 was renamed in such a way as to echo evolution, being given the name Eohippus, meaning &amp;#8220;Dawn Horse.&amp;#8221; The pair published their claims and diagrams in the American Journal of Science, thus laying the foundations of the horse series laid out from Eohippus to the present day in museums and text books as supposed evidence of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-11-24</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Powerful Influence On The Global Spread Of Belief In Creation In The World Press</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148436</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A most important truth has been imparted to the whole world in the 21st century that we are living in. People have been told that the theory of evolution, taught to them for years as if it were fact, taught in schools and discussed in magazines, articles, on the television and in films, reports concerning which are constantly appearing, is a lie. People have come across the scientific evidence for the first time in their lives and concluded that it does not support evolution at all. And as the whole world became acquainted with the facts, a huge awakening against evolution began. The echoes of this great awakening, which has been going on for a very long time, have been appearing in the world press one after the other in recent weeks. The common caption in the world&amp;#8217;s greatest publishing organs was: CREATIONISM IS SPREADING ACROSS THE WORLD, AND ADNAN OKTAR IS LEADING THE MOVEMENT.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-11-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Dawkins Is No More Darwinist! He Converted To Space Religion!</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148434</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Unable to deny the existence of 250 million fossils proving the existence of Creation, to explain even how a single protein came into existence or how life initially began, to give an example about a beneficial mutation, and seeing the glory of the fact of Creation, Richard Dawkins established a space cult for himself in an effort to cope with the profound dilemma he faced!]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-11-05</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinist Publications Are Now Admitting The Harm Done To The World By Darwinist Corruption</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148432</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A subject that Adnan Oktar discussed in his book The Social Weapon: Darwinism, first published in 2004, and later in a number of articles in the wake of a number of subsequent developments, has now, years later, appeared in world famous Darwinist publications. The subject is the school massacres that Darwinist corruption has brought with it. The common feature of the large number of school massacres concerned is that they were perpetrated by young students &amp;#8220;in the name of evolution&amp;#8221; and in the name of &amp;#8220;natural selection.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-11-16</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Response To A Pro-Evolution Program On Dem Tv And The Darwinist Nonsense On It</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148430</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The program Train of Thought, aired on Dem TV on 14 November, 2009, carried a number of accounts regarding the theory of evolution. The producers of and participants in the program must have been in a huge panic at the recent body blow dealt to Darwinism, for they sought a solution in reiterating tales that we have been hearing for the last 150 years.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-11-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A New Name For Darwinist Despair Modular Evolution And A Perfect Flying Bird: DARWINOPTERUS</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148428</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinopterus
 
The enormous scale of the Darwinist defeat and how Darwinists have no means of saving their theory has been set out with various forms of supporting evidence for a long time now. But the evidence that perhaps made this defeat clearest has come from Darwinists themselves. Darwinists, with no scientific evidence for their theories, confronted by disappointment time and time again and who have suffered their worst rout in the manifest proofs of Creation presented in recent years, have now set reason. Leaving reason, logic and science to one side, Darwinists come up with a new claim. They said, &amp;#8220;all the organs in the life form we have just discovered somehow came into existence momentarily.&amp;#8221; They then had no qualms about giving this the name of modular evolution. &amp;#8220;We do not know how it happened, but it is a form of evolution,&amp;#8221; they said. They have quite shamelessly put this false and ludicrous claim out in scientific journals, as if it were that easy to deceive people. This stage to which Darwinists have now come is one of the greatest manifestations of the Darwinist defeat]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-11-10</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Britons Want Creation To Be Taught In Schools</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148427</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Great Britain, Darwin&amp;#8217;s own homeland, now rejects evolution. For years the bastion of Darwinism, Britain has come to oppose evolution extraordinarily quickly over the past few years. The country heads the list of those in which the fact of creation is spreading the quickest, and the public, as recent newspaper headlines show, now want students to learn about the fact of creation in schools.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-11-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Peppered Moth Claim Is a Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148422</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Tree bark in the mid-19th century during the early part of the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain was light in color. For that reason, dark colored variants of the moth species (melanic moths) Biston betularia could easily be seen and caught by birds. Fifty years later, however, lichens, a kind of algae had died around the trees as a result of industrial pollution, and the trees had become darker in color. This time, it was now lighter colored moths that were more visible on the trees and that were caught more often by birds. As a result, the number of light colored moths declined, while the darker melanic moths increased in number, since these were less easily caught.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-11-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists: ""We Confess, Ida Is Not A  Transitional Form, It Is A Complete And Perfect Living Being!"" (But, when did they confess this? Right after Harun Yahya revealed their lies.)</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148420</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[It will be recalled that Darwinists tried to publicize the fossil named Ida as the so-called ancestor of human beings in May 2009. We had announced a declaration right away and ended speculations by clarifying that this fossil that is presented to be the so-called ancestor of human beings through wide speculation of mainstream media did in fact belong to a lemur. You may read our statements on Ida, the lemur fossil, here and also here. As a result, the &amp;#8220;Ida show&amp;#8221;put on play by some Darwinist circles had immediately come to an end. As a matter of fact, anyone having a perspective of true science would instantly see that Ida is a perfect living being with consummate existence for 47 million years unlike the speculations. This fossil preserved in 95% intact form with almost all details present for investigation contained NOT EVEN ONE STRUCTURE WHICH SHOWS ANY INTERMEDIARY FEATURE. This extraordinary finding IS AN EVIDENCE FOR FACT OF CREATION.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-10-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Regard Foreign Journals As Sacred</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148418</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists have recently been exhibiting a state of great awe. They believe that foreign journals are miraculous. They literally regard these journals as sacred, and regard everything published in them as equally sacred. Since they hold such a belief they imagine that everything published in them will have a stunning impact. The way they are so impressed with all things foreign and their inferiority complex that stems from their inability to defend the theory of evolution scientifically forces them to issue such statements. 
This admiration for all things foreign has reached such a dimension that proponents of evolution in Turkey in particular refuse to accept scientific evidence as such unless it is published in these journals they so admire. They oppose all kinds of scientific fact by saying, &amp;#8220;If a paper has been published in a foreign journal it is true, and if not, it is wrong.&amp;#8221; They still reject such papers if they are collected together in book form. In their eyes, in order for an article to be accurate and scientific it has to be published in a journal of some 50 pages measuring 27x20 cm, on wood-containing paper and lavishly illustrated with pictures of Darwin on the cover. But if the papers are collected together in book form, they will still regard them as unacceptable, no matter what scientific evidence they contain.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-10-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists, Fire at Will!</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148417</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists have recently been chasing around after fossils discovered decades ago. They keep looking for fossils that &amp;#8220;they can suggest as transitional forms.&amp;#8221; First, they trumpeted the fossil Ida, discovered in 1983, as the eighth wonder of the world. When this resulted in a fiasco they quickly retracted all their claims about Ida. The new star of the show is ARDI.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-10-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Pitiful Darwinists Who Imagine The Newly Discovered Fossil Anchiornis Huxleyi To Be A Transitional Fossil</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148415</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A fossil discovered in China the other day was quickly taken up as a &amp;#8220;four-winged bird&amp;#8221; in the Darwinist media. Darwinists right away claimed that this fossil might be &amp;#8220;the ancestor of birds.&amp;#8221; As ever, they immediately gave the animal a name. They baptized it Anchiornis huxleyi, in memory of Thomas Huxley, an atheist, Darwinist and 32nd degree freemason known as Darwin&amp;#8217;s bulldog.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-10-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Dawkins Has Taken the Bait</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148413</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Certain publications in Turkey have recently been reporting statements directed at the Atlas of Creation at a conference given by Richard Dawkins a year ago as if they were something new. 
 
Dawkins Has Suffered a Huge Defeat, and That Is the Reason for His Refusal to Meet Mr. Adnan Oktar: 
In making imputations regarding Adnan Oktar, Dawkins forgets his own intellectual father, Darwin. It is Darwin whose ideas he defends to the hilt, the ignoramus who was unaware of the existence even of the sciences of biology, zoology, microbiology, genetics, paleontology, geology, molecular biology and paleoanthropology, who was expelled from all the schools he entered and had no other aim than to spend times with drunken mariners. Dawkins acts as supporter of a theory launched by Darwin, who was totally ignorant of science, in the outdated atmosphere of the 19th century, a theory that today even children find laughable.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-10-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists In Shock! ""We Were Wrong, T. Rex Is Also Not A Transitional Fossil!""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148411</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A small copy of Tyrannosaurus rex, for long the subject of Darwinist transitional form propaganda, has been found in northwest China. Just as one might expect from Darwinists, the fossil, given the name Raptorex kriegsteini, was first depicted in the press as the ancestor of T. Rex. 
 
But when more details of the fossil were released, it was realized that it actually eliminated all the Darwinist speculation about T. Rex. In Darwinists&amp;#8217; own words, the new fossil dealt a lethal blow to the theory of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-09-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN&#8216;S ERRORS REGARDING THE ORIGIN OF LIFE</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148409</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The severe blows and rapid loss of support suffered by the theory of evolution in recent years has led some evolutionists to act out of panic. One of evolutionists&amp;#8217; most recent contortions appeared in the September 2009 issue of Scientific American. The magazine devoted that particular issue to &amp;#8220;origins,&amp;#8221; and offered up evolutionists claims that have already been refuted with scientific evidence and descriptions as if they had been newly discovered for the very first time.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-09-19</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Fossil Discovered In Georgia Has Once Again Overturned Darwinist Myths</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148408</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Independent newspaper took an important fossil discovery as its cover story on 9 September, 2009. Under the caption, &amp;#8220;A skull that rewrites the history of man,&amp;#8221; the report discussed fossil remains from more than one human being discovered in the Dmanisi region of Georgia. And due to their age and characteristics, these fossils totally repudiated Darwinist scenarios.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-09-10</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Glorious Irreducible Complexity In The Synthesis Of A Single Protein</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148406</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Sixty special proteins acting as enzymes are needed to make a single protein inside the cell.
If just one of these enzymes needed for protein synthesis is missing, the cell cannot produce proteins.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-09-09</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Vestigial Organ Deception Has Once Again Been Refuted By Scientists</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148405</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[According to research findings published in the journal Evolutionary Biology, it has now been announced that the appendix, described by Darwin as an organ that had become vestigial during the evolutionary process, in fact performs important functions and Darwin made that suggestion based on ignorance and a lack of scientific knowledge. 
 
Darwin imagined that the appendix had no function in the body. He therefore claimed that it was an evolutionary remnant since the organ had not been used in the process of evolution. Yet contemporary scientists have now refuted this claim of Darwin&amp;#8217;s.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-09-09</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Could Not Speculate On The Flying Fish</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148400</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Fish belonging to this family, made up of 50 species, are able to travel short distances by using their fins as wings. 
Flying fish can leap 1.5-2.5 meters in the air.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-08-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Could Not Speculate On The Hand Fish</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148399</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The fins on the hand fish&amp;#8217;s chest are quite well developed and resemble a hand. 
The hand fish uses its hands to move across the sea bed.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-08-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Could Not Speculate On The Platypus</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148398</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The platypus is a mosaic life form. In other words, it has characteristics belonging to more than one species. 
Although it is a mammal, it lays eggs. It is covered in fur, has milk glands and suckles its young.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-08-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Response To Yigit Bulut"s Claim That "You Cannot Explain What Was Before The Big Bang Nor Link That To The Big Bang"</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148397</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The fact that it is Allah Who created the Big Bang and the entire universe and all of life does not (Allah is beyond that) stem from any lack of explanation or lack of finding an answer to what went before it. In that case, that would require an explanation only to what was before and that all life and the universe were random, yet there is no such randomness on Earth (surely Allah is beyond that).]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-08-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Some Advice For Mine G. K?r?kkanat</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148396</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Statements bordering on the downright insulting made by Mine G. K?r?kkanat and directed at people who espouse the fact of Creation, solely on the basis of the fact that their views differ from hers, on the program Sansürsüz, broadcast on the Turkish channel HaberTürk, were totally unbecoming.  If someone else one day directs comments of a similar nature toward Mine G. K?r?kkanat, calling her a &amp;#8220;left-wing atheist militant&amp;#8221; for instance, she would not be at all pleased. Why employ such terms when more urbane language is available?]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-08-13</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Important Supplementary Information</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148395</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The fact that Darwin was aware of Cambrian fossils and thought that the Cambrian period dated back 60 million years: 

-    Darwin imagined that the Cambrian period referred to a time some 60 million years before his day.  Stephen Jay Gould said that &amp;#8220;Nothing distressed him [Darwin] more than the Cambrian explosion, the coincident appearance of almost all complex organic designs..." Darwin felt that distress over fossils that he imagined dated back only 60 million years. Had he known that they actually dated back 540 million years, he would probably have abandoned his theory entirely.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-08-24</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Are Terrified And Baffled By The World That Arises In Our Brains</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148394</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This was again clearly demonstrated on the program Sansursuz (Uncensored), broadcast on 14 August, 2009. The concept that panicked Darwinists was the &amp;#8220;world inside our brains:&amp;#8221;   

The photon strikes the eye, and an electric signal goes from the eye to the brain. The electric signal departs from the eye and reaches an area the size of a lentil called the sight center. And an image then forms in that lentil-sized area. THERE IS AN EYE that looks at the image that forms there. IT IS &amp;#8220;THAT&amp;#8221; EYE THAT IS ACTUALLY PERFECT. That eye sees the electricity that reaches it. And with a perception of perfect depth, brightly, vividly, in movement, full color and in three dimensions. Yet that region is pitch black. The places the electric signals arrive at, the sight center, and the interior of the brain are all in darkness. Yet the eye there sees a perfect and crystal clear image, a far better one than that produced by any high-tech television. And it interprets these images in such a way as to feel sorrow, joy, love and liking, or to analyze, remember or learn from them. 
There is a miracle going on here.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-08-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Archaeopteryx Is A Perfect Flying Bird</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148393</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[&amp;#8221;Archaeopteryx probably cannot tell us much about the early origins of feathers and flight in true protobirds because ARCHAEOPTERYX WAS, IN A MODERN SENSE, A BIRD.&amp;#8221; (Hanegraaff, Fatal Flaws "What Evolutionists Don"t Want You To Know", W Publishing Group, 2003, p. 19)]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-08-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Random Mutations Destroy Life And Cannot Produce Mutually Compatible Organs</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148392</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists maintain that living things evolve as a result of chance mutations and that blind and unconscious mutations gave rise to all the glorious variety of life we see on the Earth today.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-08-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Mosaic Evolution Deceit</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148390</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[-    It claims that every organ in the body evolved at different periods and different stages independently. 

-    Using this claim Darwinists say, &amp;#8220;we can not see a semi-reptile, semi-bird living being because the evolution takes place on the organs&amp;#8217; level.&amp;#8220;

-    That is why they try to show tiny details on perfect living beings as an evidence for evolution. Despite being an utterly lemur fossil, they showed the Ida as a transitional fossil because of its bendable thumb and claimed that it is the so-called ancestor of man.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-08-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Pikaia Is A Perfect Cambrian Living Thing, Claiming That It Is A Transitional Form Fossil Is A Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148383</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Pikaia, because of several of its features, was included in the phylum Chordata, which also includes vertebrates. The first known Cambrian representative of this phylum, it had a pair of short tentacles on the front. The trunk consisted of solid blocks of muscle, curved in an S shape. The tail expanded in the form of a fin. Pikaia swam just above the sea bed. It propelled itself by using the muscles to undulate its body.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-08-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Sayings From Bediuzzaman Said Nursi Referring To The Dajjal&#8217;s Deception Of The World Through Darwinism</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148358</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[From the three duties of Hazrat Mahdi (as) First: "Since science and philosophy are now dominant and the plague of materialism and naturalism has spread among mankind, before everything belief should be saved in such a way that it silences philosophy and materialism. &amp;#8230; preserving the people of belief from misguidance " (Emirdag Lahikasi, p. 266)]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-08-03</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Idea That the &#8220;Coelacanth is an Example of the Transition from Sea to Land&#8221; Is a Fraud</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148356</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[These words from a Darwinist, in the April 2003 issue of Focus magazine, describe the astonishment at the discovery of a living Coelacanth (Latimeria chalumnae), for years portrayed as a transitional form, in today&amp;#8217;s waters.  Prior to 1938, Darwinists had made countless claims about the fossil Coelacanth, interpreting its fins as &amp;#8220;legs about to start walking&amp;#8221; and a fossilized oil sac as &amp;#8220;a primitive lung.&amp;#8221;  With all this speculation about the fossil, they suggested that they had discovered a missing link.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-08-03</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Fundamental Philosophy Of Freemasonry: Darwinism -2-</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148354</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[As we explained in details in the first part of this text, the fundamental philosophy of freemasonry is based on Darwinism. That is because, though having no scientific aspect whatsoever, Darwinism is a fake ideology with a scientific guise propounded solely to make the mainstays of freemasonry (atheism, aimlessness, wars and degeneration),  that is the system of the antichrist (dajjal), legitimate.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Antichrist"s Insidious Game</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148352</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Freemasonry, the system of the antichrist, has played in its opinion an insidious game worldwide. It tried to indicate Muslims as the antichrist to Christians. And it tried to show Christians as the antichrist to Muslims. It set the devout people against each other and showed them as two opposing groups that struggled with each other, and that suspected from each other and played the two devout parts up against each other. The antichrist, while doing this, aims to crush the sincere devout part of each party and to weaken them. This is A CONSPIRACY INSIDIOUSLY REALIZED BY THE INCULCATION POWER OF THE ANTICHRIST IN ITS INTELLECTUAL STRUGGLE AGAINST BELIEVERS.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Claim That Archaeopteryx is the Ancestor Of Birds is A Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148349</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The fossil bird discovered in Germany in 1860 and given the name Archaeopteryx harbored certain characteristics unlike  those of today&amp;#8217;s birds. Darwinists used the teeth in its jaw, claws on its wings and long tail as tools for speculation and the bird was hastily compared to reptiles and heralded, in the absence of any scientific foundation, as a reptile-bird transitional form.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-24</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Concealment Of Cambrian Fossils For 70 Years is A Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148348</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Cambrian Period is one of the oldest in natural history and took place 543-490 million years ago. Prior to that, life consisted of single-celled organisms and a few multi-celled organisms, but during it the whole extraordinary variety of life emerged suddenly, in fully formed and perfect states.  All of these life forms have extraordinarily complex features, totally unlike those that went before them and of the kind belonging to living things today. This means that the Cambrian Period deals another deadly blow to the theory of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-24</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Fundamental Philosophy of Freemasonry: Darwinism -1-</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148347</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinism is the fundamental philosophy behind freemasonry. Because, Darwinism is the rotten basis of the system of antichrist which the freemasons try to establish in the world. Darwinism aims at estranging people from Allah, and constitutes the deviant and false ideological basis of the cruelty in the world. Therefore the freemasonry is the primary organization which tries hardest to impose the evolution theory on society. The Mason Magazine [printed in Turkey by the freemasons] explains why they support evolution theory as follows: 

Darwin&amp;#8217;s evolution theory showed that many events in the nature are not the work of God.  (Allah is beyond that)]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-24</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists are in mourning in France</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148346</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[As may be recalled, the year 2007 has been a turning point for France which is insistently protected by the Darwinist dictatorship. This situation had been due to a bombardment &amp;#8211; as Darwinists say &amp;#8211; that took place in France. The Atlas of Creation made the impact of a bomb in a flash in the French educational institutions. The French Darwinists were shocked by this magnificent work that exposes hundreds of fossils which demolished Darwinism from its base. France, that was made the stronghold of Darwinism for years by the most senior Darwinists and that was systematically deluded by the Darwinist dictatorship, all of a sudden was made to face the scientific truth by means of the Atlas of Creation.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionist Despotism in the United States</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148341</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[We have referred to the existence of a Darwinist dictatorship that rules the world, acts over and above all laws almost everywhere and that is protected under the law many times before. This is a tyrannical dictatorship, the religion of Darwinism that is totally constructed on deception, that is maintained by no scientific evidence and that therefore imposes Darwinism on mankind by way of despotism, compulsion and pressure. This despotic system tries all means to protect Darwinism and prevent anti-Darwinist activities, and recognizes no bounds as it does so. And this dictatorship is currently propped up by laws, supported by political rulers and kept on the agenda by the best-known TV channels, papers and journals, especially in Europe and America. 

America has been the scene of one of the most despotic practices of this despotic dictatorship for some time now. Various Darwinist organizations have brought LEGAL PROCEEDINGS against public schools in America in order to prevent the teaching of Creation.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists" Efforts to Cover Up Living Fossils Is Fraudulent</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148339</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwin was amazed when he found a fossilized Gingko tree leaf during his research.  An identical counterpart to something living today was found with exactly the same appearance as it has today in strata dating back millions of years. This fossil, which on its own represented a serious dead-end for his theory and which caused Darwin enormous concern, was described by Darwin in person as a &amp;#8220;living fossil.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-11</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Idea That "Mutations Cause Evolution" is A Falsehood</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148338</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Mutations are dislocations, breaks and impairments as a result of radiation of chemical effects in the DNA molecule in the nucleus of the living cell and that carries all the information about a human being. The information in DNA is set out by 4 separate nucleotides, symbolized by the letters A, T, C and G, laid out in a special and significant sequence.  But an error in a single letter in that sequence will damage the entire structure. The leukemia observed in children appears because one of the letters in the DNA is incorrect. The reason for diseases such as cancer appearing or subsequent generations being deformed as a result of the radiation leakage in Chernobyl of the atom bomb dropped over Hiroshima is harmful effects of this kind caused by mutations in people&amp;#8217;s bodies.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Celal Sengor Is Right! Darwinism Was Founded on a Momentous Lie</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148335</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In his column in the 26 June, 2009 issue of Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik magazine, Celal Sengor published a piece titled &amp;#8220;The Difficulty with Being Human.&amp;#8221;  In the article, Sengor, maintained that &amp;#8220;lies&amp;#8221; constitute the starting point for a great many discoveries and inventions, and that important scientific finds had been made as a result of them. On the basis of that, Sengor then reached the totally illogical conclusion that &amp;#8220;it is impossible to be human without imagining something false to be true and giving expression to that.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>What Will Dawkins Have to Say to This?: Londoners Say "We Support Creation"</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148334</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 1 July, 2009, issue of the Birmingham Post daily newspaper carried the results of a recent opinion poll, according to which the number of believers in London has risen considerably. These people who voted against evolution believed that Allah had created all of life, just the way it looks now and in a single moment.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-05</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists" "Common Ancestor" Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148331</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Embarrassed by the theory they espouse, Darwinists are now trying to cover up the idea that &amp;#8220;we are descended from apes.&amp;#8221;  They are now trying to place Darwin under protection, saying &amp;#8220;Darwin never actually said we are descended from apes, but referred to a common ancestor.&amp;#8221; Darwinist publications have also adopted this deception and started carrying such ludicrous captions as &amp;#8220;apes are our cousins, rather than our ancestors.&amp;#8221;  Darwinists started inventing brand new things because of their illogical claims, yet what they invented has just made their degradation even worse.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-03</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Despairing Darwinists Place Their Hopes in Heat</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148329</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In the well-known words of Adolf Hitler, the fascist murder and principal architect of the bloodiest war and slaughter in history; 
If you tell a lie long enough, loud enough and often enough, people will believe it. 

This quotation from Hitler, a conformed Darwinist, perfectly summarizes the heretical ideology of Darwinism. For 150 years Darwinists have based themselves on this philosophy of Hitler&amp;#8217;s and succeeded in convincing people of the greatest deception of history by loudly repeating it over and over again. Even today, when their lies have now been exposed for what they are, Darwinists must imagine that the same tactic can again be successful, since they are still reiterating the lie of evolution with all kinds of fraud. One of the latest instances of this is the deception that &amp;#8220;evolution happens faster in warm temperatures,&amp;#8221; which has lately been headlined in Darwinist publications.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Despairing Darwinists Place Their Hopes in Heat</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148328</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In the well-known words of Adolf Hitler, the fascist murder and principal architect of the bloodiest war and slaughter in history; 
If you tell a lie long enough, loud enough and often enough, people will believe it. 

This quotation from Hitler, a conformed Darwinist, perfectly summarizes the heretical ideology of Darwinism. For 150 years Darwinists have based themselves on this philosophy of Hitler&amp;#8217;s and succeeded in convincing people of the greatest deception of history by loudly repeating it over and over again. Even today, when their lies have now been exposed for what they are, Darwinists must imagine that the same tactic can again be successful, since they are still reiterating the lie of evolution with all kinds of fraud. One of the latest instances of this is the deception that &amp;#8220;evolution happens faster in warm temperatures,&amp;#8221; which has lately been headlined in Darwinist publications.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Claim That &#8220;Natural Selection Causes Evolution&#8221; Is a Fraudulent One</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148326</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwin proposed the concept of natural selection as an &amp;#8220;evolutionary mechanism&amp;#8221; in the 1800s.

Natural selection is in other words &amp;#8220;natural choosing&amp;#8221;. The idea of natural selection is based on the idea that powerful life forms well adapted to their natural surroundings will survive. For example, in a herd of zebra menaced by lions, it is those zebra that run fastest that will survive.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-07-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists" Latest Desperate Efforts to Keep the Dino-Bird Deception Alive</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148324</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists have once again begun raising claims that have already been answered in order to deny the enormous rout suffered by their dino-bird claims. They have been in a terrible panic, especially in recent days when evolution is going through its death throes, and have set about looking for a series of new methods of deception for the sake of propping Darwinism up. The latest instance of these concern a dinosaur fossil discovered in China and that has recently been reported in certain sections of the press. Darwinists are repeating the same hollow myths and reiterating the error that the fossil in question supposedly represents evidence for evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-06-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Is the Belgian RTBF Channel under Pressure from the Darwinist Dictatorship?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148322</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[RTBF, the Belgian national TV channel,  broadcast a program containing an interview with Adnan Oktar a few weeks ago.  The point that Adnan Oktar particularly emphasized with irrefutable evidence during this interview, which provided most valuable information on a range of issues, was the Darwinist deception.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-06-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists: "We Admit It... The Story of Bird Evolution Is a Lie!"</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148319</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[As with all aspects of evolutionary nonsense, we have for a long time been describing the same scientific facts whenever the myth of birds evolving from dinosaurs has been raised:]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-06-18</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Are in Dismay!</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148318</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists have concluded from the way orang utans produce the sound of laughter that these are the ancestors of human beings. 
Let us not provide other evidence, although this evidence may well depress Darwinists even further: If Darwinists are looking for similarities, orang utans&amp;#8217; teeth also resemble those of human beings. They also have two eyes and a nose in the front of their heads, just like human beings! They also have two ears and two arms. They eat and move. Just like human beings, they drink water and clean themselves. They have fingernails, just like human beings, and their hands resemble ours. 
And even more than all this, THEY ALSO MAKE LAUGHING SOUNDS.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-06-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Scourges Stemming From Darwinism: Communism, Fascism, Satanism And Terror I</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148311</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinism, communism, materialism, violence and terror are all inseparable parts of a single whole. Since Darwinism regards human beings as aimless animals, it leads people who adopt this perspective in the direction of rebellion, conflict, anarchy, lovelessness, selfishness and immorality.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-06-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Scourges Stemming From Darwinism: Communism, Fascism, Satanism And Terror  II</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148310</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwin Was a Racist Who Espoused the Elimination of Races He Regarded As Inferior 
Charles Darwin, the founder of the theory of evolution, based the development of living things and human beings on the concept of the struggle for life. According to that view, there is a ruthless struggle for life, a permanent state of conflict, in nature. Darwin suggested that this struggle also applied between human races and claimed that it contributed to the progress of civilization by eliminating (so-called) inferior races. Darwin&amp;#8217;s views on the Turkish nation are described as follows in the book &amp;#8220;The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin,&amp;#8221; collected by his son:]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-06-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Are Still Trying to Depict Defunct Darwinism As Scientific</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148308</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists have recently been speaking about the theory of evolution being oversimplified, in a deliberately provocative way, and being described as &amp;#8220;the facile nonsense that we were once apes and are now human.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-06-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Idea That Darwin Made An Important Scientific Discovery After His Voyages Is A Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148307</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists may imagine that Darwin made stunning discoveries following his voyages on HMS Beagle, and that he developed the idea of evolution that way.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-06-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists&#8217; Claims That Darwinism&#8217;s Saying "We Come From Apes" is An Oversimplification</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148306</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists maintain that the people around them are simplifying Darwinism and Darwin, by provocatively saying, &amp;#8220;A fool called Darwin&amp;#8221; or &amp;#8220;Look, we resemble monkeys, so we must be descended from them.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-06-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Scientists Are Embarrassed by the IDA Circus</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148300</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Even Darwinist scientists had no qualms about admitting: &amp;#8220;THE IDA SHOW IS AN EMBARRASSMENT!&amp;#8221;

The IDA FUROR, first acclaimed by the Darwinist Jorn Hurum, a paleontologist at the Museum of Natural History in Oslo, and then lauded to the skies by the Darwinist David Attenborough as the missing link that had been sought for so many years and described in the press under such headlines as &amp;#8220;the ancestor of man&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;the eighth wonder of the world&amp;#8221; has even attracted intense criticism from Darwinist scientists. In their eyes, this peculiar show IS LITERALLY A CLOWNING!]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-05-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The True Facts about the Fictitious "Missing Link" Ida  That Darwinists Never Mention</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148298</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A few days ago the Darwinist David Attenborough came up with a claim regarding a striking discovery(!). According to that claim, the fictitious missing link in human evolution was missing no longer! The fact is, however, that the fossil Ida, depicted as an extraordinary discovery in special broadcasts and publications, is in fact an extinct lemur.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-05-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Important Subjects That Were Never Mentioned On The Program &#8220;Siyaset Meydani&#8221; (Political Arena)</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148293</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Certain exceedingly important elements that would destroy all Darwinist claims and swiftly refute everything said by Celal Sengor were never mentioned on the hours-long discussion program &amp;#8220;Siyaset Meydani&amp;#8221; (Political Arena). These subjects that would immediately convince anyone watching the program and prevent the dissemination of Darwinist propaganda are:]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Invalidity Of The Claims That The Eye Is Not An Irreducibly Complex Structure And That The Eye Evolved</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148289</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[With its perfect, irreducible complexity, the eye is one of the most important subjects that neither Darwin nor the Darwinists who came after him have been able to explain. With his primitive, 19th century level of knowledge Darwin was sufficiently alarmed to say that the eye &amp;#8220;gives me a cold shudder.&amp;#8221;  Under the influence of that increasing alarm, present-day Darwinists have sought the solution in claiming that the eye is not irreducibly complex at all. That is the claim of Celal Sengor. Claiming that even unicellular protozoa have light-sensitive structures, Sengor, suggests that these are primitive eyes, and that complex eyes evolved from these so-called primitive eyes. But this suggestion is invalid because;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Radikal Must Finally Put an End to Its Attempts to Defend Darwinism</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148288</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report titled &amp;#8220;Global warming is accelerating evolution&amp;#8221; appeared on the web site of the Turkish daily Radikal on 6 April, 2009. As required by Darwinist demagoguery, the article in question carried Darwinist accounts based on statements by Axel Meyer, a professor of evolution &amp;#8211; though as always no supporting evidence was provided. The sole aim of this familiar propaganda was to keep at least part of the theory of evolution, which totally collapsed with the coming of the 21st century, alive. For that reason, the traditional Darwinist technique was employed and demagoguery used in an attempt to deceive people.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-04-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Invalidity Of The Claim That There Is Disorder In The Universe And The World</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148287</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Celal Sengor made the astonishing claim that there is no order, but chaos, in space, on Earth or in living things, while maintaining his life and existence without any difficulties in an extraordinary harmony and order, in the vastness of space. Sengor made the amazing claim that the planets had no fixed order within this disorder of which he spoke, and that the universe is in a state of great chaos.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>An 84-Million-Year-Old Seal Skull That Demolishes the &#8220;Ancestor of the Seal&#8221; Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148286</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A brand new subject reported on 22 April, 2009, in Nature magazine, and reprinted thereafter in publishing organs such as Associated Press, Reuters, BBC news and National Geographic News, as well as on Turkish web sites such as Radikal and Haber Türk, was the claim that &amp;#8220;the supposed terrestrial ancestor of the seal has been discovered.&amp;#8221; A fossil belonging to an extinct land-dwelling animal was once again made the tool of Darwinist speculation and a scenario regarding the fossil based on extensive use of the imagination resulted. This land-dweller, given the name of &amp;#8220;Puijila Darwin&amp;#8221; and possessed of four legs and a tail, was described as a transitional form &amp;#8220;swimming with four feet&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;with a tail serving no purpose&amp;#8221; in order to fit in with the Darwinist scenario. 

The scientific evidence that refutes this huge deception may be set out as follows:]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-04-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Error of Seeking to Depict the Harmony on Earth as Disorder</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148280</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Just as he did in the same demagogic way with evolution, the planets and the equilibrium on Earth, Celal Sengor attempted to portray the glorious order in living things on Earth as an environment of chaos. As evidence for that, he tried to give the impression, at least in his own eyes, that amino acids are imperfect, that only a small part of fertilized eggs survive and that only a small part of fish eggs live. These accounts stem from Darwinists&amp;#8217; being aware of the glorious creation on Earth but attempting to cover this truth up by Darwinist demagoguery. The truth is as follows:]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-04-24</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Invalidity Of The Claim That Mutations Miraculously Give Rise To Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148279</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Celal Sengor claimed that mutations have miraculous effects, and imagined he could convince viewers of the program he appeared in as a guest with the claim in question. His statement that &amp;#8220;Even Einstein can be produced with mutations&amp;#8221; is totally incorrect in scientific terms. It is a scientific fact by now known to the whole world that mutations only harm the living organism, that they can never endow living things with any new information and that, on the contrary, they destroy information that already exists. The claim that mutations have an evolutionary effect, the most important subject to which Darwinists have now pinned their hopes, has been totally discredited with the scientific understanding of the facts in question. The evidence is as follows:]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Deceit That The Human Ability To Think Is The Same As That Of Other Living Things</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148278</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Unable to account for the human ability to think, Celal Sengor responded to a question on that subject with a superficial reply about animals also having the capacity. He claimed that the crow&amp;#8217;s ability to extract food from a deep bowl or the way a monkey collects stones to protect itself against attackers is no different to the human ability to reason. But this is of course a huge deception]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Huge Darwinist Deception Regarding the Trilobite Eye</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148277</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[One of the main subjects that leaves Darwinists in a complete dead-end is the &amp;#8220;eye,&amp;#8221; with its irreducibly complex structure. 
One of the greatest proofs of Creation confronting Darwinists, who are unable to account for the emergence of the eye, is the complex eye structure that emerged some 540 MILLION YEARS AGO. The SUDDEN emergence of the astonishingly beautiful and complex TRILOBITE EYE at a time when only single-celled and a few multi-celled organisms were in existence is a fact that inflicts a total collapse on the theory of evolution. Trilobite eyes dating back 540 million years are FACETED EYES of the kind possessed by present-day flies and dragonflies.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-04-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists&#8217; Vehicles for False Speculation: Extinct Dinosaurs</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148276</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[There is only one reason why the imaginary evolution of dinosaurs is raised to intensively: the fact that dinosaurs are extinct. Darwinists take the remaining skeletons of these animals and engage in whatever speculation they please regarding them. They tell tall tales about scales turning into feathers, wings forming spontaneously and a reptile living on the ground suddenly growing wings and taking to the air, all on the basis of what they call &amp;#8220;similar structures.&amp;#8221; In their view, the public reading those, are unaware of the true nature of fossils. And we have no means of testing their claims on living dinosaurs. They therefore imagine they can tell lies under the name of science and that they can present a discovery exactly as they please to the public. But Darwinists are mistaken. People can no longer be deceived by one-sided, mendacious reports, but no research and see the truth for themselves.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-04-12</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Invalidity Of The Claim That Bacterial Resistance To Antibiotics Is Evidence Of Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148273</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists generally attempt to use the antibiotic resistance of bacteria as a so-called evidence of evolution. The fact is, however, that this attribute contributes no evolution to these life forms, but actually demolishes the theory of evolution as proof of Creation. The genes in bacteria that are resistant to certain antibiotics have existed long before those antibiotics were ever manufactured.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Scientific Respsonses To Celal Sengor&#8217;s  Demagogic Claims</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148272</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Celal Sengor, a guest on the TV program &amp;#8220;Siyaset Meydani&amp;#8221; (Political Arena), broadcast on 19 March, 2009, provided various explanations in order to defend Darwinism, which has now been totally defeated. Sengor used Darwinist demagogic techniques to attempt to re-introduce matters that had been repeated for many years but completely disproved and he totally denied the subjects at points he was unable to answer before a group of young people he could not manage to convince. Since the accounts in question have been raised once again by means of this program, it is essential to issue some reminders of the subject.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Deception That &#8220;There Are Tons of Transitional Fossils and That Dinosaur Species Represent Transitional Fossils&#8221;</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148269</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Asked &amp;#8220;Are there any transitional fossils?&amp;#8221; Celal ?engör gave the astonishing reply that there are &amp;#8220;tons&amp;#8221; of transitional fossils and that ALL dinosaurs represent transitional fossils. This unexpected reply IS A BLATANT DECEIT.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Deception That Therapsids Are Trani?tional Forms</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148268</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Celal ?engör engages in propaganda to the effect that the therapsids, which he describes as &amp;#8220;reptiles with moustaches,&amp;#8221; are an intermediate form between reptiles and mammals.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Deception That Photosynthetic Bacteria Formed and Manufactured Oxygen with &#8220;A Small Evolution&#8221;</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148267</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Celal ?engör claimed that bacteria making photosynthesis emerged &amp;#8220;with a small evolution&amp;#8221; and began manufacturing oxygen. This is a terrible deception:]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Deception That There Was No Oxygen in the Primeval Atmosphere</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148266</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Celal ?engör has claimed that life began with anaerobic bacteria that breathe in an oxygen-free environment, that oxygen appeared gradually on Earth and that oxygen-breathing bacteria then emerged as a result. This is an explanation meant to support the claim that there was no atmosphere in the primeval atmosphere. But such claim is wrong.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-03-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Invalidity of the Claim that The Idea That Whales Evolved from Bears Did Not Originate with Darwin</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148265</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Since they are unable to account for a mammal that lives in the sea, Darwinists are unable to invent a scenario that might account for the existence of the whale. They merely make do with claiming that a land-dwelling life form returned to the sea.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Invalidity of the Claim That Man&#8217;s Ancestors Lived in Caves</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148264</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Celal ?engör claimed in the program that human beings&amp;#8217; ancestors were primitive, cave-dwelling creatures. This is the &amp;#8220;stone age&amp;#8221; deception put about for many years in order to be able to impose the idea of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Invalidity of the Claim That New Species Evolve Every Year</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148263</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Celal ?engör has claimed that 40,000 species disappear every year and that 1,000 new species evolve to replace them. But the idea that new species evolve is an invalid one.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why Do Darwinists Not Give Up?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148258</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinism is the worst mass deception in the history of the world. This false theory, launched with a false use of science, is supported by not a single piece of scientific evidence. But this deception has still been disseminated across the world, using false fossils and intense demagoguery, and has entered school books and is taught as a compulsory course in universities.  Propaganda for this deception has been carried in the world&amp;#8217;s best-known scientific journals and other publications, as if it were an established fact. This is a result of the systematic activity of the Darwinist dictatorship that has ruled the world for the last 150 years. The Darwinist dictatorship uses this technique to wear people down:]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-20</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Transition To Bipedalism Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148250</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Celal Sengor has claimed that supposed humanoid apes &amp;#8220;stood up when being on four legs became difficult.&amp;#8221; That claim is definitely invalid:]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>How Can Dawkins Explain the Perfect Eye in Our Brains?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148242</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The main reason why Darwin said, &amp;#8220;the thought of the eye made me cold all over&amp;#8221; is the fact he had no explanation to offer in the face of the eye&amp;#8217;s extraordinary complexity. But the fact is that Darwin knew very little about the eye. Genetics had not been discovered in his day, there were no electron microscopes and nobody even dreamed what microbiology was to reveal. Subsequent scientific advances revealed the extraordinary structure of the eye in all its glory. Since even the level of knowledge of the 19th century was sufficient to alarm Darwin, who knows what he would have done had he known what we know today.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-16</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolution Surveys Under The Monopoly Of The Darwinist Dictatorship</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148241</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An opinion poll was conducted in Britain. But the result came as a shock to Darwinists. The level of belief in the theory of evolution, in Darwin&amp;#8217;s homeland, Britain, where Richard Dawkins&amp;#8217; atheist and Darwinist propaganda is most intense, emerged at a mere 25%.  Britain&amp;#8217;s best-known dailies immediately carried the story. This important and major development came as a real shock to Darwinists. It was the loudest declaration of Darwinism&amp;#8217;s defeat.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-16</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Dawkins Is Aware That He Was Defeated, He Is Presenting Excuses Not To Meet With Mr. Adnan Oktar</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148240</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On March 17, 2009 issue of Wall Street Journal website, an article by Andrew Higgins titled &amp;#8220;An Islamic Creationist Stirs a New Kind of Darwinian Struggle&amp;#8221; in which he featured Mr. Adnan Oktar is posted. In the article in question, it is noteworthy that Dawkins&amp;#8217;s supposed reason for not meeting with the author is that &amp;#8220;he is not knowledgeable about zoology and biology.&amp;#8221; This is obviously an excuse. Since Dawkins often meets with middle school children and evangelical priests to discuss his claim.  So, what we have to ask is this:]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-17</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>""Aggrieved Darwin""Propaganda Is a Trick</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148238</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A new piece of propaganda has recently entered the agenda in the Turkish and international pro-Darwinist press. It has persistently been claimed that reports about Darwin are censored and that &amp;#8220;science is therefore under pressure.&amp;#8221; Under headlines such as &amp;#8220;They have sent Darwin to the shredder,&amp;#8221; the Darwinist dictatorship tries to give the world the impression that Darwinism is being &amp;#8220;aggrieved.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-16</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Vatican Has Surrendered To Darwinists</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148233</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Vatican, the symbol of Christianity, HAS OFFICIALLY SURRENDERED TO THE DARWINIST DICTATORSHIP. 
Instead of praising Almighty Allah (God), introducing the beauties created by Him and joyfully reaching out to people and remembering our Lord as the One and Only by showing Allah&amp;#8217;s sublime creative power, THE VATICAN IS MAKING PROPAGANDA FOR DARWINISM, which is currently leading the world toward atheism and a system of repression.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-10</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Replies to Ekstra Bladet, Denmark&#8217;s Well-known Daily</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148230</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On Ekstra Bladet website, Denmark&amp;#8217;s daily with a mass circulation, in an article of Thomas Harder in which Mr. Adnan Oktar was mentioned, a few questions were directed to the author. Below, you will find questions directed by Ekstra Bladet and the author&amp;#8217;s replies. These replies were also posted on the website of Ekstra Bladet on March 6, 2009.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Dawkins! You Can&#8217;t Reach a Point by Debating Priests</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148225</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[You&amp;#8217;ve turned down Mr. Adnan Oktar&amp;#8217;s face to face debate offer by bringing along scientific evidence. Now you only debate secondary school children and priests. If you&amp;#8217;re after  victory, you&amp;#8217;ll be ashamed.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-04</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>1,5 Million Year Old Footprints is a Brand New, Shocking, Severe Blow to the Imaginary Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148224</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 21st century is the century when the collapse of Darwinism is declared. Following the unveiling of 100 million fossils declaring the collapse of Darwinism, the greatest blow to the theory is a newly found human foot print fossil. Contrary to all the Darwinist claims, this fossil indicates that CONTEMPORARY MAN WAS LIVING 1,5 MILLION YEARS AGO.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-03-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Atalay Girgin Is Mistaken: Darwinism Is Dead and There Is a Mass Turning to Belief in Allah</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148221</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Turkish daily Radikal carried a report by Atalay Girgin on its website. In summary, Girgin interprets the belief in Allah in different forms and divides and says that Darwin opposed belief in Allah, the Creator of all things from nothing, the Almighty and the free of all imperfection.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-02-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Dawkins, a renown researcher and a priest of pagan religion, researching the animals in detail he claims to be his ancestors in Kenya with his extraordinarily intelligent gaze.</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148219</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The pagan religion existed during ancient Egypt and Sumer. They claimed that all the living things formed in muddy waters by chance. During that time, pagan priests who were defending this belief existed. Dawkins is one of the priests of pagan religion in our century.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-02-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists&#8217; Greatest Embarrassment on the Agenda: Pointless Efforts to Keep the Myth of Whale Evolution Alive</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148215</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On 4 February, 2009, New Scientist magazine carried an article titled &amp;#8220;Primitive Whales Gave Birth on Land.&amp;#8221; As a result of speculation about a 47-million-year-old whale fossil found in Pakistan, the fossil in question is claimed to represent the fictitious ancestor of whales and it is suggested that this confirms the Darwinist idea of the forebears of whales being terrestrial animals. The report was quickly covered by such Turkish news sites as CNNTurk.com, Milliyet and Sabah, and presented to readers with demagogic statements though with no accompanying scientific evidence. 
In the article in question, a female whale fossil and fetus discovered with it were used as vehicles for hasty speculation material by Darwinists, who sought to portray the fact the fossil was found on land as evidence for the &amp;#8220;whales ancestors dwelled on dry land&amp;#8221; deceit. It was also suggested that the head of the fetus had emerged from the whale, which died in giving birth, and this was also submitted as evidence for the same claim. 
But like all Darwinist speculation about whales, this is also based on a huge deception.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-02-04</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>DEVOUT CHRISTIANS SHOULD POSE THESE QUESTIONS TO THE POPE</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148214</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[With a recent statement announcing the entire world that it has a moderate outlook on Darwin&amp;#8217;s evolution theory, Vatican claimed that the faith of creation in Christianity and biological evolution are complementary. With this statement indicating the Pope&amp;#8217;s point of view on Darwin, Vatican, the symbol of Christianity, has undertaken the patronage of an surprising, and even disturbing explanation. 
In the face of these explanations that can never be reconciled with faith in Allah (God) and Christianity, it needs to be brought to light whether these extremely disturbing statements belong to Vatican or not.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-02-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Fifteen Proofs that Disprove Darwin on the 200th Anniversary of His Birth</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148210</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On the 200th anniversary of Darwin&amp;#8217;s birth, the magazine Nature carried an article in the hope of restoring his outdated theory to the agenda and resuscitating it after its demolition this century. The Turkish scientific journal Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik also carried the Nature report under the title &amp;#8220;Fifteen Proofs That Prove Darwin Right.&amp;#8221; Its aim was the same as that of the Darwinist journal Nature; to restore the theory of evolution, a theory that has been demolished and rejected by 80% of the world, to its former good name.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-01-29</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Allah Has Created the World People Watch in a Space No Bigger Than a Lentil</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148209</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The cover story of the 7 February, 2009, issue of New Scientist magazine appeared under the caption &amp;#8220;Born Believers.&amp;#8221; The article, which attempted to correlate belief in Allah (God) with the theory of evolution, which claimed that human beings possess the attribute of belief in Allah through a characteristic inherited from their supposed forebears, and that listed countless Darwinist accounts in order to back that claim up, in fact represented another despairing effort on the part of Darwinists, who have already been comprehensively defeated.  The text, which soon received local press coverage as well, attempted to portray the predisposition to believe in Allah from birth as a result of natural selection and, furthermore, made the hollow and irrational claim, on the basis of these accounts, that it developed belief in Allah in the human brain. (Allah is beyond this)]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-02-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Guardian: Darwinism in Britain Has Collapsed!</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148207</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The British daily The Guardian recently described the global impact of the works of Harun Yahya. A survey named &amp;#8220;Rescuing Darwin&amp;#8221; project, prepared in order to rescue Darwinism, which is in an increasing state of collapse, on the 200th anniversary of Darwin&amp;#8217;s birth, has revealed the full impact on Europe of the works of Harun Yahya. And in Britain, regarded as the bastion of Darwinism, IT HAS EMERGED THAT ONLY 25% OF PEOPLE BELIEVE IN DARWINISM.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-02-03</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinism is the Main Source of Racism</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148206</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A huge wave of propaganda has recently been initiated in various Turkish and international Darwinist publications. Some of the headlines that have appeared in these publications are: &amp;#8221;Hatred of slavery drove Darwin ideas, book says&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;Darwin: shaped by slavery&amp;#8221;, &amp;#8221;Darwin&amp;#8217;s Anti-Slavery Views May Have Guided His Theory of Evolution.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-01-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Truth That Darwinist Bus Posters Confess: Darwinism = Atheism</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148202</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Posters recently being displayed on some 800 buses in Britain openly declare a fact that the Darwinist lobby and its supporters have tried to cover up for so many years: DARWINISM LEADS TO ATHEISM. The bus posters, supported by Richard Dawkins, an atheist and Darwinist, represent one of the most important proofs of that fact.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-01-20</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Tales of &#8220;Feathered Dinosaurs&#8221; No Longer Deceive Anyone</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148200</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report titled &amp;#8220;Dinosaur Fossil Reveals Creature of a Different Feather&amp;#8221; recently appeared on the Science News web site.  This report was carried in a  variety of Darwinist publications in order to support the lie that birds evolved from dinosaurs, and yet again revealed the despair that has been afflicting Darwinists for a very long time.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-01-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A New Evolutionist Irrelevance: Speculation on a 385-Million-Year-Old Spider Fossil</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148199</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The latest speculation regarding a 385-million-year-old fossil depicted in newspaper headlines as the world&amp;#8217;s oldest spider fossil once again demonstrates evolutionist irrelevance. The report in question appeared on the BBC News web site on 23 December 2008, under the headline &amp;#8220;Tangled web of spider evolution;&amp;#8221; it also appeared in Turkey in such publishing organs as the CNN Türk web site (23 December 2008) and the daily newspaper Star (24 December 2008). The report maintained that a spider living 385 million years ago was unable to spin webs in the same way as spiders living today, and that spiders acquired that ability through imaginary evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-11-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwin&#8217;s Legacy confirmed on the 200th Anniversary</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148198</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In 1859, 150 years ago, Darwin said the following in his book the Origin of Species:

WHY, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see Innumerable trans?t?onal forms? Why is not all nature In confusIon instead of the species being, as we see them, well defIned?

Innumerable transItIonal forms must have exsted, why do we not fInd them embedded In countless numbers In the crust of the earth?
Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links?]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2009-01-10</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists&#8217; Shameful Scenarios about Supposed Human Evolution: MSNBC Still Imagines It Can Deceive People</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148194</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The MSNBC carried a report titled &amp;#8220;Before and After Humans.&amp;#8221; This report, claimed that in 5 million years&amp;#8217; time, human beings will supposedly and literally evolve into extraterrestrials. The article was also illustrated with fictitious pictures representing 1-million-year stages showing human beings supposedly changing in appearance and turning into very peculiar entities.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-12-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Daily Hürriyet Has Placed Its Hopes in Kangaroos</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148192</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report carried in the Turkish dailies Hürriyet and Radikal, as well as in other publications, on 19 November, 2008, stated that &amp;#8220;kangaroos are our genetic relatives&amp;#8221;. The report said that the marsupial genome had been unraveled and the kangaroos were genetically similar to human beings, thus representing yet another of the hollow myths of evolution we are so familiar with.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-11-19</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Zülfü Livaneli is Mistaken in Thinking that Creation and Evolution Can Be Reconciled</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148191</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In an article titled &amp;#8220;Creation and Evolution&amp;#8221; published in the Turkish daily Vatan on 2 November, 2008, Zülfü Livaneli stated that Creation and evolution were not incompatible and hinting, by citing various references, that Creation and evolution should be accepted together. However, Zülfü Livaneli is wrong. 

The claim in Zülfü Livaneli&amp;#8217;s article, quoted in the words of a friend and defended by him, that the fictitious first cell emerged from a bowl of water is a massive lie that Darwinists have been using to deceive people for the last 150 years. At present not one of the hundreds of proteins in the cell has ever been manufactured under technical laboratory conditions, let alone the cell itself. The odds of a single protein molecule forming by chance have been calculated as 1 in 10950. That figure id expressed by the number 10 followed by 950 zeros, and in mathematical terms is regarded as zero probability. (In mathematics, all probabilities smaller than 1 in 1050 are regarded as zero.) Zülfü Livaneli claims that we can obtain a cell by taking a bowl of water, placing various amino acids and proteins in it and boiling it all up. This is a claim left over from the 19th century climate of ignorance in which Darwin imagined the cell was a bubble filled with water. We can put as many minerals, vitamins and organic substances into a quantity of water as we like, and even amino acids and proteins which, contrary to what Livaneli claims, cannot possibly form by themselves; we can then try to stimulate reactions with lightning and electrical charges; we can watch over that water, waiting for a cell to emerge, for millions of years, bequeathing the job from one generation to another, but no cell will ever emerge from it. No living thing will emerge. This has been definitively proved by 21st century science. And that is why Livaneli&amp;#8217;s attempt to resurrect this outdated claim will have no results.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-11-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>False Speculation on Protein from Darwinists Unable to Account for Protein Formation</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148188</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 13 November, 2008 edition of the Turkish daily Hürriyet carried a report about how a newly discovered series of protein supposedly represents evidence for the theory of evolution.  The report stated that proteins manufacturing ATP went into action to preserve the functionality of protein chain damaged as a result of artificial mutations and as a requirement of Darwinist propaganda an attempt was made to depict this discovery as supposed evidence for evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-11-13</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinism: The Worst So-called Scientific Deception &#8211; 2</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148183</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Since Darwinism is an ideology based on deceiving the world and turning people away from belief in Allah (God), the supporters of the Dajjal have to try to keep it alive, no matter what the cost.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Dajjal&#8217;s Plotting Has Come to an End - 1</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148181</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The life of this world is a transient thing in which good and bad, beauty and ugliness appear, by their actions in which human beings are tested, and in which believers and non-believers are distinguished from one another. Almighty Allah, Who has created all beings and this testing, has also created an enemy in the form of a denier and wrong-doer to confront believers as part of the test.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-10-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinism: The Worst So-called Scientific Deception &#8211;1</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148180</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Materialism and the various ideologies and movements stemming from it represent one of the worst forms of corruption opposed to religion in the present day. The idea that encapsulates all these and that is their supposed scientific starting point and foundation is Darwinism.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-10-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Dajjal&#8217;s Plotting Has Come to an End - 2</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148178</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[As can be seen from the many various signs in the hadiths, the period we are in is the &amp;#8220;End Times.&amp;#8221; It is clear from the hadiths of the Prophet (saas) that the End Times are taking place now and, by Allah&amp;#8217;s leave, the return to Earth of the Prophet &amp;#8216;Isa (as) is also to be expected in this period. Just as we are told in the hadiths, the Dajjal is making his corruption felt in the End Times we are living in, and rebellion, evil, division and degeneration is spreading across the world.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-10-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Human Evolution Never Happened!</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148175</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On 7 October 2008, a report was carried in various well-known Darwinist publications. Titled &amp;#8220;Human evolution has finally stopped,&amp;#8221; the report contained speculation about the supposed evolutionary future of man by the British geneticist Steve Jones. According to Jones, who suggests that human evolution has now come to an end, if humanity survives, human beings in 100 million years&amp;#8217; time will look little different to people today.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-10-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A New Dino-Bird Lie and Darwinists&#8217; Pointless Wriggling</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148174</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article in the 19 October, 2008, issue of Nature announced to the scientific world that a new &amp;#8220;dino-bird&amp;#8221; had been discovered. It maintained that this creature, described under the headline &amp;#8220;A bizarre Jurassic maniraptoran from China with elongate ribbon-like feathers&amp;#8221; had &amp;#8220;primitive feathers&amp;#8221; and represented an example of the imaginary transition from dinosaurs to birds.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-10-19</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>All That Is Left of Specious Intermediate Fossils: Another Tiktaalik Roseae Myth</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148173</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Evolutionists seek to give the public the impression that fossils support evolution. Yet despite 1.5 centuries of excavations, not a single fossil to back up these efforts has ever been found. For that reason, Darwinists have sought a solution in inventing intermediate forms.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-10-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Bans That Cannot Be Breached in Universities</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148172</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Over the centuries, various theories have been proposed in biology, physics, chemistry, biochemistry and just about all other such branches of science. These are then either eventually confirmed or disproved. Thus is it that scientific theories lead to scientific progress.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-11-05</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Darwinist Techniques of Clamor and Demagoguery</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148171</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[There is not one single piece of evidence for Darwinism. For that reason, for the last 150 years Darwinists have used a different technique to providing evidence; clamor and demagoguery.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-11-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Another Twisted Belief With The Same Logic As Darwinism Has Now Appeared: ""Fakewinism""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148169</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A new scientist one day emerged. His name was Charles Fakewin. Fakewin proposed a brand new theory and claimed that ghosts really exist.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-11-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Evolution Of Human Intelligence Error In Scientific American Magazine</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148167</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The mind and brain section of the August 2008 issue of Scientific American magazine carried a report &amp;#8220;Animal Intelligence and the Evolution of the Human Mind&amp;#8221; by Ursula Dicke and Gerard Roth. The claims made in the report, that &amp;#8216;human intelligence is a slightly more developed form of the conceptual capacities of non-human primates as a result of evolution&amp;#8217; and that &amp;#8216;intelligence had to emerge from a 1.5-kilo nervous circuit located inside our skulls&amp;#8217; reveal that the article was written with Darwinist and materialist preconceptions devoid of any scientific evidence.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-08-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Have Declared That They Cannot Account for the Origin of Life</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148166</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwin&amp;#8217;s theory of evolution is based on the idea of the fictitious &amp;#8216;first cell&amp;#8217; that is alleged to have been inexistence at the beginning of life. The whole scenario that Darwinists build around life is based on that first cell that they claim came into being by chance, in muddy water.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-10-29</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Virus Evolution Errors In New Scientist Magazine</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148161</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its 27 August, 2008, edition the magazine carried an article by Gary Hamilton containing speculation about the role of viruses in so-called evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-08-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Statement to Darwinists</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148159</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Harun Yahya espouses the scientific view, one of the fundamental values of the Republic. Pro-Darwinist publications, on the other hand, espouse the nonsense of evolution, a mass deception that has taken in the whole world.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-10-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>""Spore:"" Further Pitiful Evolutionist Contortions</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148158</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[People have been deceived by the theory of evolution for the last 150 years and have always been told the following lie: &amp;#8220;evolution is scientific&amp;#8221; (!). The fact is that evolution is not scientific at all, however. Everything scientific refutes evolution. Every branch of science defies evolution. Palaeontology has inflicted grievous disappointment on evolutionists, and there exists not a single intermediate fossil to substantiate evolution. Genetics has shown that the cell is no simple structure.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-10-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Statement on the Recent Skull Discovery in China</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148156</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Evolutionists make a huge fuss over new fossil discoveries. The public are exposed to headlines carrying intensive evolutionist propaganda about claims of missing links.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-04-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Familiar Sociobiological Myths in The New York Times</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148153</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 15 July, 2008, edition of The New York Times carried a report written by Nicholas Wade. His article, titled "Taking a Cue from Ants on Evolution," discussed the latest research by the Harvard University entomologist Edward O. Wilson. In addition to the Encyclopaedia of Life, about biological diversity, and the book Superorganism, co-authored with Bert Holldobler, about termites, ants, wild bees and honey bees, his 1975 book Sociobiology also discussed the theory he proposed.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-07-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The &#8220;Ape-Man&#8221; Reported by daily Hürriyet Turned out to Be a Hoax!</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148151</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The course of the hoax-filled history of the theory of evolution has seen many frauds, including embryological fraud, the dino-bird fraud and the peppered moths fraud; however, the &amp;#8220;ape-man&amp;#8221; fraud occupies a special place in that history.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-08-18</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Evolutionist Tradition Of Concealing Fossils</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148150</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinism is such a terrible lie that the proponents of this ideology had no hesitation over producing hoax fossils and exhibiting these for 40 years.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-08-30</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Dawkins Declines to Debate with Creationists, Because He Has No Answer to Give!</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148148</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[For the last 150 years Darwinists have been utterly terrified of one thing: the exposure of their lies! They strive with all the means at their disposal to prevent the exposure of the fraudulent nature of the theory of evolution, which they have desperately tried to keep alive as an unshakeable ideology, a religion, ever since Darwin&amp;#8217;s time.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-08-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Scientific American must abandon its blind support for evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148145</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On 16 June, 2008, Scientific American web site carried a report titled &amp;#8220;Were Meteorites the Origin of Life on Earth?&amp;#8221; The article in question reported the results of chemical analyses performed on the Murchison meteorite that fell to earth in Australia in 1969. A team led by Zita Martins, an astrobiologist from Imperial College in London, identified certain organic compounds in the meteorite, which contribute to the production of DNA and RNA and are known as &amp;#8220;nucleobases.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-06-16</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Ihlas.net must realise that evolutionary myths are unscientific</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148144</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report carried on the ?hlas.net web site on 19 July, 2008, titled &amp;#8220;The 100-kilo Tusks of the Mastodon, the Forebear of the Elephant,&amp;#8221; discussed the findings from palaeontological excavations in the Kemer district of the Turkish province of Burdur.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-07-19</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Neanderthal Error on the Guncel.net web site</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148143</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article titled &amp;#8220;Why Did Neanderthal Man Vanish from the World?&amp;#8221; appeared on the Guncel.net web site on 8 August, 2008. The report described genetic analyses carried out by scientists from the Max Planck Institute in Germany. The study was an examination of mitochondrial DNA obtained from fossils remains from Neanderthals, who lived in Europe and Asia between 30,000 and 250,000 years ago. The researchers were looking for the reason why Neanderthal Man vanished from the fossil record 30,000 years in the past, and they concluded the genes of modern man, Homo sapiens, might have combined with those of Neanderthal Man.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-08-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Yakup Kepenek&#8217;s Evolutionary Errors</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148142</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 30 June, 2008, issue of the Turkish daily Cumhuriyet carried an article by one of the paper&amp;#8217;s writers, the economist Yakup Kepenek. In his article, titled &amp;#8220;Origin,&amp;#8221; Kepenek noted that 1 July, 2008, was the 150th anniversary of the day Charles Darwin first announced his discovery of what he referred to as the law of evolution, and heaped praise on the theory and Darwin himself. The errors in Kepenek&amp;#8217;s article, which are clearly ideological in origin, are refuted below.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-06-30</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Should Produce Proof of Evolution Rather Than Engaging in Demagoguery</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148139</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Since they lack any scientific evidence, Darwinists have no other method than demagoguery they can use. For whole, long paragraphs they use strange and incomprehensible words that not even they themselves understand, and imagine that they can thus influence their readers. Darwinists, who think that these statements, commonly known as &amp;#8220;verbosity,&amp;#8221; are enough to convince people of the rightness of their case, imagine that old techniques are still valid today. The fact is, however, that these demagogic statements devoid of any evidence convince nobody, anywhere.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-08-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Evolution Of Multi-Cellular Organisms Myth In Science Daily</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148138</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The news portal Science Daily carried a report of a study published in the scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academies of Science titled &amp;#8220;New Evidence That Ancient Choanoflagellates" Form Evolutionary Link Between Single-celled and Multi-celled Organisms&amp;#8221;).]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-08-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Dinosaur Evolution Error in New Scientist</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148136</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report titled &amp;#8220;Dinosaur evolutionary tree unveiled&amp;#8221; appeared on the New Scientist.com web site on 23 July, 2008. Written by Colin Barras, the article dealt with a taxonomic study published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.[i]]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-07-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Human And Chimpanzee Errors In Discover Magazine</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148131</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Discover magazine web site carried an article of Jim Holt titled &amp;#8220;Laughter May Outlive Humans&amp;#8212;and Even Numbers&amp;#8221; on 27 June, 2008. The article suggested that human beings may well disappear in the future, but that such human characteristics as laughter and counting will survive in the species that evolutionists imagine will replace them in the evolutionary process. In addition to this guesswork, based on various statistical techniques, it also used another familiar Darwinist technique and proposed that humans and chimpanzees diverged from a common forebear some 5-7 million years ago.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-06-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists&#8217; False Speculation Regarding the Turbot</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148129</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[One important component of Charles Darwin&amp;#8217;s theory of evolution by natural selection is &amp;#8220;gradual development.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-07-10</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Richard Dawkins Is Wising Up!</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148128</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[University of Oxford zoologist Richard Dawkins, who is known to be Darwin&amp;#8217;s Rottweiler, has long been striving to sustain a theory which is exposed to a universal destruction and is finally wising up! 

In all his recent articles, conversations and interviews, Dawkins has begun to voice a single truth: that life on Earth cannot have formed by chance!]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-07-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Idea of Mammalian Evolution Is a Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148127</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report on the Science Daily web site dealt with an article published in the internet edition of the journal Nature Genetics and titled &amp;#8220;Evolutionary Origin of Mammalian Gene Regulation Is over 150 Million Years Old&amp;#8221;. (3 July 2008). The study, carried out by the SAVOIR research consortium including researchers from various universities and institutions used molecular analysis to investigate epigenetic mechanisms and genomic description.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-07-03</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Aerodynamic Factors That Enable Bats to Fly Exhibit the Sublimity of God&#8217;s Creation</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148123</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A recent study by Swiss and American scientists has revealed the aerodynamic characteristics that keep bats aloft. Just like insects, bats make use of air currents they set up with their wings to keep themselves in the air during flight. These air currents comprise up to 40% of the total force keeping bats aloft. 
Bats are highly manoeuvrable.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-05-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionist speculation about Ventastega</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148122</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report titled &amp;#8220;Fossil fills out water-land leap&amp;#8221; recently appeared on the www.bbc.co.uk web site. Dated 25 June, 2008, the report announced the discovery of the latest remains of a fossil described as Ventastega curonica in Nature magazine, the first specimens of which had been unearthed in 1994. The fossil in question is being portrayed as a stage in the supposed evolutionist scenario of the transition from water to land and has been claimed, on no scientific grounds whatsoever, to fill one of the gaps in that imaginary passage.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-06-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The ""Monkey-Making"" Gene Deception in Daily Vatan</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148121</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Turkish daily Vatan continues to make unscientific distortions by ignoring the insoluble dilemmas facing the theory of evolution in order to keep Darwinism alive. Most recently, in its 4 March, 2008, edition, the daily used a scientific finding that constitutes no evidence for the theory of evolution as a propaganda tool by hanging all kinds of Darwinist terminology on it.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-03-04</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Myth of the Evolution of the Brain in  The Daily Telegraph</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148119</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On its web site The Daily Telegraph newspaper carried a Darwinist myth about the supposed evolution of the brain. The report in question was titled &amp;#8220;Study traces the evolution of the human brain&amp;#8221; and described a new study by researchers from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and published in the British scientific journal Nature.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-06-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Daily Aksam&#8217;s lie that &#8220;Intelligence turns people away from religion and faith&#8221;</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148118</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Atheists are rapidly being routed in the face of advances in modern science. As the world famous Vienna University sociologist of religion Paul M. Zulehner stated in a report in The Washington Times titled &amp;#8220;Atheism in Decline Worldwide&amp;#8221;: 
True atheists in Europe have become an infinitesimally small group. There are not enough of them to be used for sociological research.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-06-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Homo Floresiensis is a Homo Sapiens Individual With Arrested Development, Not a Separate Human Species</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148116</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Evolutionist propaganda regarding the remains of Homo floresiensis has come up with a new explanation in the face of the latest research. The view that the skeleton in question, announced in 2004 as the &amp;#8220;the anthropological discovery of the century&amp;#8221; and added to the human family tree as a new species, is not in fact a separate species but a diseased form of Homo sapiens was initially raised among the research community.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-07-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Daily Telegraph&#8217;s Distortions Regarding Gerobatrachus</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148109</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 21 May, 2008, internet issue of the Daily Telegraph carried a report titled &amp;#8220;Missing link fossil settles frog evolution debate.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-05-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Jokela High School Massacre: Another Application of Natural Selection</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148108</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Pekka-Eric Auvinen was an 18-year-old Finnish student. On 7 November, 2007, he left his home for the Jokela High School in the town of Tuusula, 43 kilometres from Helsinki, as he did on every other school day. On that day, however, Auvinen had an extraordinary reason for going to school, one which the whole world would learn of in a matter of just a few hours.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-11-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Platypus Genome Analysis and Evolutionists&#8217; Distortions</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148107</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its 8 May, 2008, Nature magazine carried a report titled &amp;#8220;Genome analysis of the platypus reveals unique signatures of evolution.&amp;#8221; The report stated that scientists have deciphered the genetic code of the platypus, which has various mammal, bird and reptile characteristics. &amp;#8220;It is hoped that genetic analysis of the platypus will help explain how mammals, including human beings, in some way evolved millions of years in the past,&amp;#8221; it said.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-05-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The myth of the evolution of the whale in New Scientist</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148106</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report published by the New Scientist news service on 19 December, 2007, outlined a description  of a new fossil discovery claimed by evolutionists to represent the ancestor of the whale.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-12-19</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Myth of the Water-Dwelling Ancestors of the Elephant on Ntvmsnbc.com</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148105</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report on the Ntvmsnbc.com news portal on 17 April, 2008, raised a new evolutionary myth &amp;#8220;manufactured&amp;#8221; on the subject of the origin of elephants. Under the heading &amp;#8220;The ancestor of the elephant lived in water 37 million years ago,&amp;#8221; the report suggested that the ancestor of the modern elephant was a water-dwelling creature with a lifestyle similar to that of the hippopotamus and lived 37 million years in the past.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-04-17</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Abram Katz"s Fantastical Claims</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148103</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article in the American daily New Haven Register, written by Abram Katz and containing various comments regarding subjects included in Harun Yahya&amp;#8217;s Atlas of Creation, contained both inaccurate information and unscientific interpretations.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-05-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionist Propaganda Concerning the Fossil Onychonycteris finneyi Is Untrue</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148101</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A new fossil bat, unearthed in the U.S. state of Wyoming in 2003 and estimated to be 52 million years old, is being used as a tool for evolutionist propaganda. The well-preserved fossil, known as Onychonycteris finneyi, was announced in the 14 February 2008 issue of Nature magazine by a team of researchers from the American Museum of Natural History, the Royal Museum in Ontario, Canada and the Senckenberg Research Institute in Germany. It says that the interesting thing about the fossil is that, unlike present-day bats, its ear morphology suggests that it had no echolocation abilities and had claws on all digits. Present-day bats, on the other hand, have claws on only two digits of each hand. In addition, the hind legs of Onychonycteris finneyi are relatively much longer than its forearms than is the case with present-day bats. Its sternum indicates that it was able to fly under its own power. Its teeth are similar to those of bats alive today and show that it mainly fed on insects.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-02-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>New York Times&#8217; Latest Darwinist Fairy Tale: The False Link between Dinosaurs and Birds</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148100</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The New York Times, carried a report titled &amp;#8220;Tests Confirm T. Rex Kinship With Birds&amp;#8221; on 25 April, 2008. This concerned research conducted into 68-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus rex bone tissue discovered in the Hell Creek region in the east of the US state of Montana in 2003 by Harvard University&amp;#8217;s Chris Organ and his team. The researchers compared the proteins obtained with those from 21 different species of bird. They then interpreted the resulting molecular data in the light of the theory of evolution, suggesting that this species of dinosaur was directly related to the chicken and the ostrich.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-04-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The first part of The ""Encyclopedia of Life"" Has Now Been Released</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148099</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The first release of the Encyclopedia of Life portal, which contains 30,000 species and eventually aims to document all species of life on Earth, is available on the web site www.eol.org. Every species on the site has its own page containing images and relevant facts. The aim is for the number of species documented to reach 1.8 million by 2017.[1]]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-05-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Another blow to evolutionist claims regarding ""Homo floresiensis"": Similar miniature remains have been described as Homo sapiens</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148092</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The ongoing debate among evolutionists over the miniature human remains described 4 years ago and discovered on Flores Island in Indonesia recently acquired a new dimension with the unearthing of similar human skeletons on Palau Island in Micronesia. The evolutionist researchers who unearthed the Flores bones described them as a separate human species, though many authorities on the subject subsequently opposed that claim, suggesting instead that the humans on Flores were abnormal individuals from a deformed Homo sapiens population. The latter view came to predominate as new bones were discovered, and it once again became clear that those evolutionists describing the bones of a separate human species were not behaving objectively.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-05-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Blow to Evolution Theories from the Latest Ape Fossil</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148082</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In a report dated 12 November, 2007, the well-known news agency Agence France-Presse announced that an ape fossil found in Africa had challenged the theory of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-11-12</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The latest findings regarding the modern behaviour of human beings who lived tens of thousands of years ago</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148081</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In dreaming up their scenarios of human history, evolutionist scientists stretch their imaginations to set up a fictitious transition from the primitive to the more advanced.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-02-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Neanderthals&#8217; Shared Language</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148072</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The results of the latest genetic research have once again proved that the Neanderthals were a race indistinguishable from modern human beings by revealing that, just like us, they possessed the capacity for speech.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-12-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Myth Regarding The Origin Of Hands And Feet On ntvmsnbc.com</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148071</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report published by the news portal ntvmsnbc.com on Friday, 26 October, 2007, added yet another component to unscientific Darwinist propaganda.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-10-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Zimmer&#8217;s Error Concerning Mathematics and Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148064</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 1 September, 2008, issue of The New York Times carried a report by Carl Zimmer titled "Gaming Evolves." The article dealt with a computer simulation-based evolutionary game known as "Spore." Spore begins with single-cell organisms that turn into intelligent multi-celled life forms over the course of the game. As the game progresses these multi-celled organisms develop and establish civilisations, colonise galaxies and settle on new planets. This evolution occurs as users gaining DNA points add organs such as arms or wings to a life form.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-09-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Facts about the Human Body of Which Darwinists Are Unaware</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148057</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The supplement to the 31 August, 2007, edition of the Turkish magazine Cumhuriyet Bilim ve Teknik carried a report titled &amp;#8220;The Human Body Is Filled with Evolution&amp;#8217;s Worst Mistakes.&amp;#8221; One of the worst errors in the report, written on the basis of the preconception that human beings evolved from primates, was the claim that humans were subjected to various flaws during the supposed process of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-08-31</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A New Convergent Evolution Lie: The Scenarios Dreamed up around Pseudotribos robustus</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148056</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report published in the 1 November, 2007, edition of Nature magazine and on the National Geographic web site on 31 October, 2007, raised another question regarding which Darwinists find themselves in an impossible position &amp;#8211; the facts that different life forms have had similar structures for millions of years]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-11-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolution Is a False Theory, Not Science</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148052</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwin&amp;#8217;s theory of evolution is a religion and has nothing whatsoever to do with science. For 150 years now, Darwin&amp;#8217;s theory of evolution has deceived the world in the name of science. Palaeontology, embryology, archaeology, microbiology, genetics and zoology are all branches of science, but evolution is not.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-10-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Living Things Never Evolved in Any Way, and There Is No Foundation to Scenarios of Human Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148051</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[<p>
	The situation today has stunned evolutionists and inflicted severe panic on them. There is at least one specimen of every one of the living things in existence today, be it a wolf or a fish, a woodpecker or a flycatcher, a deer or a tortoise, in the millions of years of natural history. We can see from the fossil record that every one of these life forms were in existence millions of years ago.</p>
]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-10-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>How Much Further Will Darwinists Have to Push Their Imaginary Evolutionar Process Back?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148050</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwin set out, at least in his own eyes, the timing and course of the imaginary evolution of living things. According to Darwin, living things developed from the supposed first cell, which itself appeared by chance, and one gradually turned into another, again by chance.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-10-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Bilim ve Teknik Magazine"s Biased Interpretation of Human Beings" Superiority over Chimpanzees</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148046</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In July, 2007, the Turkish magazine Bilim ve Teknik published an article by Prof. Osman Demirhan from Çukurova University titled "What Makes Us Different?". The article in question investigated the insuperable differences between human beings and chimpanzees and what the molecular causes of these might be.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-07-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A New Fictitious tale of Human Evolution from Scientific American</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148045</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article titled "What is the Latest Theory of Why Humans Lost Their Body Hair? Why Are We the Only Hairless Primate?" appeared on the Scientific American website on 14 July, 2007. According to evolutionists" first theory on this subject, the imaginary ancestors of man who lived half in water and half out, hunting in shallow waters, some 8 million years ago lost their hair because it was not an effective insulator in water, and this was replaced by a thick layer of fat beneath the skin]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Science Daily Classic; Attempts to Depict Ape Behavior as Evidence for Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148044</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On 8 June, 2007, the Science Daily web site carried a report titled ""Cultured" Chimpanzees Pass on Novel Tradition." This claimed that different behavioral characteristics among various chimpanzees shed light on imaginary evolutionary adaptation.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-06-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Fossil That Refutes Theories of Human Evolution, and Darwinist Propaganda</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148043</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article titled "Earliest Primate Ancestor Had Surprisingly Tiny Brain" appeared on the Newscientist.com website on 31 May, 2007. Various other publications such as National Geographic and Science also carried the same report under a variety of other headings. It was reported that a newly discovered 29-million-year-old fossil by the name of Aegyptopithecus zeuxis had a rather small brain, contrary to all Darwinist expectations.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-05-31</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Chemicel Mechanism In Insect Has Existed For 100 Million Yeras</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148041</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report on the Science Daily web site on 30 August, 2007, discussed a soldier beetle that had been trapped in amber while squirting out poison to repel an attacker. The fossil in question dated back 100 million years, and this provided important information about these insects and their chemical equipment and also invalidated evolutionary scenarios on the subject.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-08-30</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""The Whole Story""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148040</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In this segment of the documentary dealing with dogs we are informed about the various types of this animal and its special qualities such as its sense of smell. Evolution has made erroneous claim about the origins of these animals from which the following statement is quoted]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""The Whole Story: Ungulates""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148039</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In this documentary about ungulates, this story is told about the origin of these creatures:
"65 million years ago, when dinosaurs disappeared, the first ancestors of ungulates appeared. These condylarths disappeared generations ago and, today"s ungulates, they used to walk on their toenails. Today"s ungulates are evolved from condylarths. 50 million years ago, ungulates divided into two kinds, single and cloven."]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-10</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""The Secrets of Cats""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148038</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In this documentary about members of the cat family, the following was said about cheetahs: "In evolution, some of its characteristics became a very fragile. One of the problems is the cheetah"s face. It has become a serious problem that makes cheetahs unable to kill their prey once they have caught it. Besides this there is its hanging tail. This is a genetic defect seen in many cheetahs."]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-12</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""Animals: A to Z The Beetles Record Breakers""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148037</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[At the beginning of this documentary about species if insects, this evolution story is told: "Insects evolved in great numbers. They evolved from being covered with armor to creatures that live under the ground and those that are wonderful flying machines&amp;#8230;.. One of the reasons why insects have been so successful is the design of their wings. Their front wings became a protective armor covering the delicate wings they use to fly. This is what allowed them to conquer the world. "]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-12</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic TV ""Trapping Komodo Dragons for Conservation""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148036</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This was a documentary describing Komodo Dragon and the environment of this interesting reptile. But along with all the facts there were some interesting words directed to the subconscious of the viewers: &amp;#8220;About 30 million years ago the Komodo Dragon evolved from a different branch in Asia.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic TV ""Super Croc""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148035</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This documentary about the various species of crocodile tells about this animal&amp;#8217;s strong sense of smell, sight and hearing. Commentary in this segment tells the old story of the evolution of crocodiles.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0203-04-19</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel ""The Ultimate Guide""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148034</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The segment of &amp;#8220;The Ultimate Guide&amp;#8221; documentaries entitled &amp;#8216;Birds of Prey&amp;#8217;, deals with flesh-eating birds such as eagles, owls and vultures. The documentary shows that vultures have a highly developed sense of smell that enables them to detect the smell of a carcass from a distance of several kilometers; eagles have eyes that allow them to see a small mouse from a kilometer away and owls have a special arrangement of the feathers in their wings that lets them fly without being noticed. But, surprisingly, towards the end of the program, Discovery Channel starts to tell the same old story about how these complex physiological structures and the even more complex systems that enable them to fly are the result of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel ""Riddle of the Rays""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148033</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This program about rays that usually live in areas near the ocean floor tells a self-contradicting evolutionist story. First it gives an evolutionist explanation of the origin of rays: &amp;#8220;Despite the fact that rays and sharks, their close relatives, began long ago to evolve in a different manner, they are among the most successful sea creatures&amp;#8221;. A few minutes later, it says that rays have not changed for almost 150 million years.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic TV ""Snake Wranglers: Swimming with the sea snakes""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148032</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This story occurs at the end of this documentary about sea snakes: &amp;#8220;But in the context of evolution, they became used to living in the sea where pray was much more plentiful&amp;#8230;&amp;#8230;.nostrils that can be completely closed, a tail in the shape of an oar and big lungs that help them to stay under water.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Latest Coelacanth Fossil And Evolutionist Errors</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148031</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On 1 August, 2007, the msnbc.com web site carried a report titled "Fin fossil gives clue to evolution of limbs". This referred to a new 400-million-year-old coelacanth fossil and contained evolutionist claims regarding it. Researchers from the University of Chicago in the USA who examined the fossil identified a number of features absent from present-day coelacanths, on the basis of which they claimed that it was a mistake to refer to the fish as a "living fossil."]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-08-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic TV ""Africa&#8217;s Deadly Dozen""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148030</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This program is about Africa&amp;#8217;s 12 most deadly kinds of snakes and it says that &amp;#8220;nature gave every one of these snakes their strength and abilities and the desire to use them in order to survive.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""Zebra: The Trailblazers""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148029</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In the program speculation based entirely on imagination is put forward concerning the black and white designs which provide zebras with wonderful camouflage. In the section in which zebras facing one another groom each other"s necks with their teeth is the following statement]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel ""Ultimate Guide: Bears""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148028</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In the program, information is given about the lives and various characteristics of different species of bear. The following fairy tale is told in connection with the origin of bears:
In ancient times pandas were predators just like wolves.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""Champions of the Wild""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148026</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In this program about giraffes, an extraordinary claim is put forward concerning their necks. Animal Planet describes the necks of giraffes as "the product of the delirium of evolution." However, this statement is based on no scientific evidence and is completely illogical.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""Champions of the Wild""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148025</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The following evolutionist statement is made in this documentary about insects:
Bats and birds developed a pair of fingers into wings. But the wings of insects emerged by themselves and are very strong.
Both statements are incorrect. Let us examine them in turn.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-03</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel ""Ultimate Guide: Snakes""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148024</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Certain evolutionist claims have been inserted into this documentary which gives various information about snakes. The first of these concerns the ability of snakes to swallow prey larger than their own heads. On this subject, Discovery Channel makes this claim]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-10</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic ""Snakebite!""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148023</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[As in all its earlier programs about snakes, National Geographic again claimed that snake venom is the product of evolution. There is no scientific evidence whatsoever for these claims. Moreover, the complicated chemistry of snake venom, the fangs which inject it and the channels it passes through are all complex designs which cannot be accounted for by evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""Insectia: Scorpions""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148022</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In this Animal Planet documentary, it is claimed that scorpions emerged on land 450 million years ago and were the first vertebrates "bold" enough to do so. Animal Planet also claimed that the so-called evolutionary ancestors of the scorpion were creatures living in water with gills of nearly 1 meter.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-09</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel ""Sea Wolves""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148021</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In this documentary the Discovery Channel made the following claim regarding the shark: 
Its reputation comes from a 400-million-year evolution which perfected its senses and biology.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-30</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""The Crocodile Hunter""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148019</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This program contained an evolutionist claim concerning the iguana, which lives on the Galapagos Islands. A female biologist expressed this in the following terms: 
There is a theory that sea iguanas are the evolved state of land-dwellers millions of years ago.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-05</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel ""The Ultimate Guide: Elephants""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148018</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This program about elephants contained a number of claims about these animals&amp;#8217; so-called evolution. You can find our response to this broadcast, a repeat of a program we have replied to before, on http://www.darwinism-watch.com/disc_channel_030407.php]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""Animals from A toZ: Zebras""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148017</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[We have already responded to this program. You can find our reply on http://www.darwinism-watch.com/evolution_tales.php]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""A to Z: Piranhas""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148016</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The subject of this program was a species of carnivorous piranhas as opposed to herbivorous piranhas. Animal Planet presented the difference in feeding habits as if the consequence of evolution. The channel claimed that fruit falling from trees shaped this evolution process.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel ""The Most Extreme""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148015</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This program investigated record holding animals and various claims were made in relation to the evolutionary ancestors of ostriches. Information was given on an extinct species of a big bird that could run very fast. The scientist relating these claims suggested that this bird evolved from moorhens, caught horses running and even ate them. Then it was claimed that horses at that time were less evolved and that they had far smaller bodies than today.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""Natural Comparisons: Dead Ringer""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148014</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[We have already responded to this program. You can find that response at: 
http://www.darwinism-watch.com/evolution_tales.php]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-28</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic Tv "" Snake Wranglers""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148013</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The program contained the following statement by a biologist who studies snakes in their natural habitats: 
I am most impressed by the way that snakes have evolved to perform complex tasks without arms and legs.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-31</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic ""Insects from Hell: In Deep Guano""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148012</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This section, which discussed insect species which live dependent on bat colonies, told an evolutionary tale regarding centipedes. The program explained a red species of centipedes and claimed that thanks to evolution the bodies of these animals had become full of toxins.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel ""The Jeff Corwin Experience""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148011</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[&amp;#8220;The River Wolf and the Isle of Serpents&amp;#8221; 
This program, which dealt with various species living in the rain forests of Brazil, contained nothing more than evolutionist propaganda based on distorting the facts about a species of snake.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""Big Cat Diary""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148010</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An evolutionary claim regarding cheetahs&amp;#8217; anatomies was carried in a program about these animals. It was first explained how the cheetah skeleton was very light to allow it to run fast, and then claimed that this feature was an &amp;#8220;evolutionary cost.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-24</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet ""Island Life""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148009</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This program on Animal Planet concentrated on various species living on Kangaroo Island, located in south Australia. In one part of the documentary the relationship between one particular species of flower and two species of bee was examined.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-09-10</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National geographic ""Earth Pulse""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148008</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This program discussed a number of living species which are about to become extinct and dealt with the efforts to protect their lives in the wild. One part of the documentary showed a care centre which takes in pumas trapped and mistreated by human beings.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-28</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic ""Fox City""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148007</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This documentary dealt with a species of fox living in Israel. The program was presented by scientists who observed the foxes in their natural habitats, in a semi-desert environment, and made an evolutionary claim about the origin of birds. In one scene, where foxes stole and ate the young from a bird"s nest, it was suggested that the alleged evolution of birds was as old as the time of reptiles and dinosaurs.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-28</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel ""Little Big Cats""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148006</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In this documentary which described cat species living in various parts of the world made the following claim about the origin of cats, a claim devoid of any scientific evidence and which was nothing more than fairy tale: 

&amp;#8220;The body structure of the standard cat is the physical design which makes a cat a cat. As all cat species underwent evolution in line with their lifestyles and needs, there were small changes in the main design, and thus the 37 modern cat species were born.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-29</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel ""O"Shea"s Adventure""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148005</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This documentary was about the island snake known as the Tiger Snake, and contained evolutionist propaganda concerning a biological change linked to microevolution. According to this, researchers who regularly monitored tiger snakes observed that within a few years the stripes in one snake population which they monitored had disappeared.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-09-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic Tv ""Last of the Dragons""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148004</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In this program, information was provided about various species of reptiles. In describing the scales which cover reptiles" bodies, National Geographic TV accounted for the origin of these structures with the following evolutionary tall tale: 
Scales were provided by the process of evolution over millions of years for different purposes. They were given to allow the snake to assume a colored appearance, thus warning its enemies that it was poisonous, for defence, and to allow it to move on land.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-09-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Mega predators</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148003</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This documentary on the Discovery Channel provided information about extinct giant species. The species introduced were brought to life with computer animations, and megalodon fish, an extinct species of shark as large as a bus were described. However, as information was being given about these giant sharks" feeding habits an evolutionist claim was also made.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-09-09</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Sea Wolves</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148002</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[We have already responded to this program, and you can read that reply here.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-09-10</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Secret Life of Mouse</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148001</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An evolutionary claim concerning the origin of mice was made in this program, which described how they are used as experimental animals in medical and genetic research and the useful contribution they make to man"s fight against disease. According to this claim, there is a high genetic similarity between mouse and man, and it was suggested that both evolved from a mammal known as the sorex.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-09-10</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Last of the Dragons</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=148000</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[We have already responded to the evolutionist claims in this program about reptiles.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-07-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Go Wild: Expedition Manatee</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147999</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This film dealt with similarities between manatees (a species of plant-eating aquatic mammal found in tropical Atlantic coastal waters) and elephants, and suggested these had evolved from a common ancestor.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-08-10</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Go Wild: Expedition Lemur</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147998</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The subject matter of this documentary was the lemur species living on the island of Madagascar of south-east Africa. A story was told about how these animals are claimed to have reached the island on a log 60 million years ago, evolving from the &amp;#8220;proto-lemur.&amp;#8221; (proto = ancestral)]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-05-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Koala Quandary</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147997</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A documentary called &amp;#8220;Koala Quandary&amp;#8221; was screened on National Geographic TV on 28 January, 2005. The documentary, whose subject matter was the Koala Bear, which lives in Australia, offered the following evolutionary fairy tale regarding the animal&amp;#8217;s digestive system]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-01-28</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Earth Ride</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147996</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This documentary presents a series of unscientific and impossible scenarios one after another as if they actually happened. The film was made up of pictures of imaginary evolutionary periods from 400 million years ago to the present that were more fantastic than the tales of the Arabian Nights, and these pictures were presented to viewers as if they were scientific facts.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-13</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Next Wave: Elephant Seals</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147995</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This documentary about sea mammals like elephant seals and whales there contains an extremely amateurish evolutionist propaganda. In a segment that shows a leadership struggle among elephant seals gathered on the shore, we see how male elephant seals protect their family of many females and defend their territory from other males.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>PBS ""Shape of Life - II""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147994</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[First of all, there is no mechanism in nature which directly develops living things from simple to complex. If we are to make a comparison, complex forms are like technologically superior tools. Just as technologically superior tools require more engineering knowledge than their predecessors, complex life forms require more genetic information in their DNA than simple ones.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>PBS-1 ""Shape of Life""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147993</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A documentary concerning the phylum Annelidae stressed that in general the worms which emerged during the Cambrian period possessed the same body plans as a great many living things in the world today. However, it was also claimed, on the basis of evolution, that worms are the evolutionary ancestors of many creatures. Nothing positive emerged in the portrayal of evidence of these claims, however.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Natural Comparisons</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147992</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The cloak of logic developed by the proponents of the theory of evolution was revealed for all to see in this program. The basis of this series of documentaries was to do with claims regarding convergent evolution and homology.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-05</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Natural Comparisons: Poles Apart</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147991</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This was the second part of the serial documentary that began on the 5th of July. The documentary explained similarities in nature from an evolutionist perspective. For instance, the program related that the fur of animals, living on the north and south poles respectively, had a similar structure despite the distance in between the poles, but proceeded to claim that they evolved under similar environmental conditions.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-19</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>OSheas Big Adventure</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147990</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The researchers who screened this program about a species of lizard which lives in Papua New Guinea and which has green blood, made a number of comments about whether or not that blood could be used against a number of diseases. One of the researchers claimed that the blood of this lizard may have evolved in order to protect it against predators or parasites.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-28</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Home Cats</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147989</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This program about domestic cats recounted evolutionary tall tales concerning these animals" vision and their immunity to the AIDS virus. The Discovery Channel provided information about domestic cats" light-sensitive eyes and explained that these animals were also distinguished by their immunity to the AIDS virus.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-09-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Latest Evolution Tales</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147988</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[One of the defining features of evolutionary propaganda is the way it is based on telling tall tales. TV channels and newspapers that relate such stories and interpret debateable findings in the light of their own preconceptions impose the theory of evolution on people as if it were a thesis rooted in sound scientific fact.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Toothed Titans</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147987</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In a segment of this program about sea elephants, we see scenes of sea elephants being attacked by a polar bear as they rest on a small rocky island. The sea elephants are panic stricken, and in order to protect themselves from the attack they rush into the sea.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-05</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Wholly Story: Hyena</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147986</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[To show that hyenas are related to cats and not dogs may seem surprising; actually there are many other animals that have a very different appearance but have a genetic similarity. For example, the sea cow, elephant and field mouse have similar genetic characteristics. But the sea cow is a mammal that lives in the water, the elephant is a gigantic land mammal and the field mouse is a land mammal many times smaller than an elephant.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Return to the Wild: The Adopted Kangaroo</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147985</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[There was in interesting claim in a documentary dealing with the animals of Australia. Why can&amp;#8217;t kangaroos protect themselves from being killed on the highways by large transport vehicles? The preferred answer to this question has been provided, with difficulty, by the theory of evolution. Again, with no proof, a totally imaginary scenario has been devised and presented as a scientific fact.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Wild About</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147984</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[We have previously given our answer to this short 10-minute program which speaks of the mystery of creatures living in deep waters and you can read it here.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-10</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>An Animal&#8217;s World: Chimpanzees</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147983</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[With this program Animal Planet yet again engaged in Darwinist propaganda based on chimpanzee intelligence and behavior. Animal Planet"s efforts to construct parallels between man and monkey throughout the program were striking. The documentary dealt with chimpanzees" use of tools and certain "political" behavior, such as making noises.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-13</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Deadly Liaisons</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147982</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In this program Animal Planet gave a rather negative indication of its level of understanding of the question of the origin of life. This documentary about snakes contained the following statements about a snake which feeds on chicks in bird nests out in open ground]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-29</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Cleverest Ape in the World</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147981</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[We have already responded to this program.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animals from A to Z: Too Close For Comfort?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147980</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This documentary covered a subject which is frequently resorted to in Darwinist propaganda in order to mislead the public: chimpanzee intelligence and behaviour. Its subject matter was a group of chimpanzees who live in the rainforests, known as the Tai Jungle, on the coast of the Western African country The Ivory Coast.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-18</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The First Human</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147979</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This program dealt with the fossil finds known as Orrorin tugenensis. This fossil find, discovered by a team led by the French researchers Brigitte Senut and Martin Pickford in late 2000 and thus called "Millennium Man" by the press, came with the finding of 12 pieces of bone. Although researchers have claimed that this creature walked on two legs, this has still not yet been fully accepted, even amongst evolutionists.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Neanderthal Enigma</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147978</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[We had previously commented on this program.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-16</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Real Eve</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147977</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[We had responded to this program, and you can read that reply here.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-09-09</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Real Eve&#8221; Episode 1</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147976</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This documentary considered the claim that modern human populations descended from a woman who lived in Africa tens of thousands of years ago, and the spread of man all over the globe was treated within the framework of that thesis, itself entirely the product of the imagination.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-07-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Survivor: The Mystery of Us</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147975</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This documentary aired classic evolutionary fairy tales from the scenario of human evolution. It maintained that human being is a creature that emerged millions of years ago when an ape descended from the trees and began standing upright on two legs. We have already replied many times to the classic evolutionary fairy tales in this program.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-02-20</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Phantom of the Deep</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147974</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The porcupine fish is a species that can at once inflate to double its size by sucking in water. It scares away the enemy and prevents being swallowed. Animal Planet asks the following question in one of the scenes showing this fish and gives the following answer:
... Or how did a fish learn to inflate to twice its body size when it encounters danger? Definitely one of nature"s most successful experiments.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-20</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>An Evolutionist Fairy Tale about Mormyrids (Elephant Fish)</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147973</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its July 2006 edition, the Turkish scientific journal Bilim ve Teknik (Science and Technology) published an article titled &amp;#8220;A Snapshot of Evolution with the Electric Fish.&amp;#8221; The article reported a study conducted in the African country Gabon by researchers from Cornell University in the USA. Working along the banks of the Ivindo River, the researchers performed measurements on the electric fish living in the river.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-07-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Latest Instance of Evolutionist Dogmatism</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147972</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Turkish journal Bilim ve Teknik (Science and Technology) carried a report headed &amp;#8220;Was Life Inevitable?&amp;#8221; in its December 2006 issue. The report concerned a new claim about the so-called spontaneous generation of life. The noteworthy thing in the article, however, was the judgmental crisis of the researchers concerned, rather than the claim itself, which was devoid of any scientific evidence. Let us examine this crisis, which can be seen to stem from a blind devotion to materialism.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-12-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Yet Another Blow to the Myth of Vestigial Organs</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147971</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinism considers all life on Earth as a product of chance mutations and natural selection and, as an a priori commitment, excludes intelligent design. In order to argue against design, the Darwinist mind seeks for flaws in the biological systems. From Darwin to Dawkins, over and over, this dogmatic stance has led the evolutionist to insist on the existence of imaginary flaws and "useless" vestigial organs in living systems. However, over and over, these bold claims by evolutionists turned out to be manifestations of ignorance. The allegedly vestigial organs were discovered to be performing very important functions and the whole "vestigial organ" argument turned out to be a fallacy.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionist Misjudgments</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147970</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Today human beings fail to create even a single cell with all the accumulated knowledge and advanced technology. In the words of Micheal Denton, claiming that millions of living organisms with complex systems, which modern technology can only imitate, have emerged as a result of coincidence, in other words supporting the evolution theory, "is simply an affront to reason." For which reason, those advocating the theory of evolution display serious scientific errors or misjudgments. In this text, we will examine some of the recent examples of the misjudgments of evolutionists appearing in the popular Turkish media.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionists Grab At One Last Hope For Signs of Life in Space</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147969</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The research discussed in the BBC article went like this: Data obtained from the Galileo space probe is leading to conjectures that underneath the layers of ice that cover the surface of Europa, a moon of Jupiter, there could be oceans. Evolutionists, who claim that life can spring up on its own in every puddle and are impatiently seeking evidence that life also began on other worlds all on its own, are hoping to stumble on living organisms in these oceans assumed to exist beneath Europa"s surface. However, all this is nothing but conjecture and wishful thinking, and the evidence that would support the evolutionists" expectations is lacking.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2002-09-30</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Latest Versiyon Of Baseless Evolutionist Scenarios In Scientific American: Nutrition</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147968</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In the December 2002 edition of Scientific American magazine, appearing under the headline "Food for Thought," by William R. Leonard the article spoke of man being a so-called evolved species of animal and attempted to form a link between his nutritional needs and traditions on the one hand and evolution on the other. By means of this article, which was based solely on the speculation of evolutionist scientists and offered no scientific evidence whatsoever, there was an attempt to place the suggestion that man was a species of animal which had come about by chance into the reader"s subconscious.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2002-12-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Desperate Darwinists&#8217; Virtual Offensive</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147967</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The May 8, 2002, edition of Nature magazine carried a study showing the terrible dilemma facing the Darwinist account of biocomplexity. Unable to offer any scientific evidence from nature, the fossil record or the laboratory to back up the claim that the complex features in living things were acquired in stages, Darwinists were apparently seeking consolation in the virtual world.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2002-05-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Time Writer M. Lemonick"s Mind-Body Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147966</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Time magazine carried an article called "Your Mind, Your Body" in its February 17, 2003, edition. It was suggested that the Cartesian separation of mind and body no longer applied, and that psychologists and neurologists were now agreed that mind and body were interconnected. The claims in this article, written by Michael L. Lemonick, consist of nothing but deceptions. All Lemonick does is to set out his own materialist fantasies, though he is unable to offer a shred of scientific evidence to back them up.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-02-17</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Time Magazine"s Error Regarding The ""Fight Or Flight"" System</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147965</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its February 17, 2003 edition Time magazine carried a story titled "Evolution"s Role: A frazzled mind, a weakened body." Written by Michael D. Lemonick, the article dealt with stress and the problems is produces in the body. It referred to the "fight or flight" reaction, which occurs in human beings in sudden situations, claiming that this reaction was a form of behavior which had come about with evolution. Lemonick"s claim is backed up by no scientific evidence, and all he had to say consisted of preconceptions.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-02-17</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>New Scientist"s Latest Myth: ""Hiccups Are A Legacy From Evolution""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147964</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article in the February 8, 2003, edition of the British magazine New Scientist carried speculation by an evolutionist researcher called Christian Strauss, who suggested that hiccupping in human beings was a feature left over from evolution. He claimed there was a similarity between respiration in frogs and hiccupping, and suggested that this might be a feature stretching from 370 million years ago to modern man. However, Strauss offered not one piece of evidence to back this claim up, and merely engaged in speculation along the lines of ""might be." In fact, Allan Pack, from the Pennsylvania University Respiratory Neurobiology Department, stated that the claim was a "very tough to prove." (1)]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-02-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>New Scientist"s ""Evolution With Climate"" Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147963</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The February 22, 2003, edition of New Scientist magazine carried an article called &amp;#8220;Squirrels evolve as the world heats up.&amp;#8221; The story maintains that a mammal species has for the first time been observed to evolve in order to adapt to climate changes. It is described in New Scientist how some living things migrate to cold, polar regions in order to avoid the effects of global warming. The claim is then made that instead of migrating, squirrels have genetically adapted to climate changes. Yet New Scientist is in error: there is no evolution in the changes of which it speaks.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-02-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic TV"s Monkey Tales and Social Darwinist Propaganda</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147962</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A documentary called &amp;#8216;Who&amp;#8217;s Aping Who?: Social Climbing&amp;#8217; was broadcast on National Geographic TV on April 2, 2003. The documentary reflected one of National Geographic TV&amp;#8217;s most frequently encountered forms of Darwinist propaganda. Yet again, National Geographic TV strove to show similarities between great ape and human behaviour and to make people believe that apes and human beings are related. This article reveals the inconsistency of National Geographic TV&amp;#8217;s Darwinist claims.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The BBC"s Errors On Religon</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147961</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[BBC 2 aired a documentary on the 17th of April 2003 in which a totally unfounded and prejudiced claim was made. It said that faith was a so-called illness and leaders of religion in history were people who should have been treated as patients. In this article, we will explain why this claim is invalid and why it is the product of a warped mind.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-17</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Discovery Magazine"s Evolution Of Laughter Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147960</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Discover magazine published an article titled "Laughter" in its April 2003 issue. The article attempted to explain happiness from a materialistic perspective, drawing on neuroembryologist Robert Provine"s views. It was claimed that that the brainstem coordinating the muscle movements in laughter was primitive and that laughter benefited evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Science Fictitious Evolution Propaganda By The Animal Planet Channel</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147959</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On the 2nd of May the Animal Planet channel aired a documentary called "THE FUTURE IS WILD." It was about animals, which would supposedly &amp;#8216;evolve&amp;#8217; over the next two hundred million years. Computer generated images of weird looking animals were accompanied by an even weirder storyline: A species of fish called &amp;#8216;flish&amp;#8217; would appear. These fish that have the ability to fly, would eat all the other fish, and cause their extinction.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Tales Of Evolution From Andrew Berry</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147958</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An interview with Andrew Berry was carried in a Sunday supplement to the Turkish daily Vatan. (&amp;#8220;We are no more intelligent than our ancestors of 5000 years ago!&amp;#8221;, Vatan, 13 August, 2006). In this interview with Pinar Ersor, the Harvard University geneticist Berry gave evolutionist interpretations of human beings&amp;#8217; physical limitations, attractiveness factors, and differences between men and women, and set out, one after the other, evolutionist claims adopted as dogma.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-08-13</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Another Evolution Myth Demolished</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147957</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article headed &amp;#8220;Yawning Gap Divides Monkeys and Us,&amp;#8221; which recently appeared in New Scientist Magazine, has dealt another major blow to a decades-old myth of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2002-09-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Misconceptions About the Human Genome Project</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147956</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The completion of human"s gene map today does not yield the result that man and ape are relatives. One need not be deceived by evolutionists" attempts to exploit this new scientific development just as they do with all others.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The ""Junk DNA"" Myth Is On The Brink Of Collapse</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147955</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[As previously explained in the writings of Harun Yahya, "Junk DNA" is a concept that was born out of Darwinist prejudices. Darwinists assume life to be an accidental phenomenon - a myth that is refuted by the intricate design in living organisms. Their assumption of non-design has led them to define the parts of DNA whose functions could not have been clarified to be non-functional at all. But this argument from ignorance is on the brink of collapse; new discoveries about DNA reveal that every part of this molecule is meaningful - a testimony to the intelligent design in its origins.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Mispresentations About The Human Genome Project</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147954</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[THE APE-MAN SIMILARITY IS A TALE!
The completion of human"s gene map today does not yield the result that man and ape are relatives. One need not be deceived by evolutionists" attempts to exploit this new scientific development just as they do with all others.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Latest Genetic Similarity Propaganda And The Bigotry Of The Darwinist Media</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147953</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Reports of a new study on genetic similarity have recently been appearing in Darwinist publishing organs. The subject was the genetic similarity between man and chimpanzee, which evolutionists frequently employ as a propaganda tool. This latest study (1) , by a team led by the researcher Morris Goodman of Wayne University in the state of Michigan in the USA, concluded that there was a 99.4% degree of similarity between human beings and chimpanzees. In the light of the scale of that figure, Goodman suggested that chimpanzees and bonobos (pygmy chimpanzees) should be removed from the Pan genus and included in the Homo genus, of which man is a part.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Science Magazine"s Amino-Acid Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147952</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its March 2003 edition the magazine Bilim ve Teknik (Science and Technique) carried a short article called &amp;#8220;The First Synthetic Living Thing.&amp;#8221; The article, a translation of a news story in Science magazine, reported on an experiment on the Escherichia coli bacteria carried out by Peter Schultz. The magazine made the statement that this experiment was of great importance from the point of view of understanding so-called evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Science Magazine"s Haploid-Diploid And Adaptive Mutati?n Errors</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147951</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its March 2003 edition the Turkish magazine Bilim ve Teknik (Science and Technique) carried a report headed &amp;#8220;Haploids Are Superior, But&amp;#8230;&amp;#8221; The report concerned an article titled &amp;#8220;An Evolutionary Advantage of Haploidity in Large Yeast Populations,&amp;#8221; which had appeared in the January 24, 2003, edition of Science magazine. Based upon an experiment on brewer&amp;#8217;s yeast, the story contained speculation regarding the so-called evolutionary advantages of haploidity and diploidity. Yet that experiment is not evidence of evolution. The evolutionist claims put forward stem from a subjective interpretation of the results obtained from the experiment.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Tv"s ""Junk DNA"" Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147950</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Discovery TV aired on April 9, 2003 a program entitled &amp;#8220;DNA: The Promise or the Price? Episode II.&amp;#8221; Its subject was DNA research and new encouraging developments in the field of medicine. However, it also contained a biased evolutionist claim about DNA. This article will reveal that the evolutionists &amp;#8220;useless DNA&amp;#8221; contention is erroneous.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-09</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Focus Magazine And Richard Dawkins" Story Of The ""Selfish Gene""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147949</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The March, 2003, edition of Focus magazine carried an article called "The Gene is Selfish." This dealt with various evolutionist theses developed from Darwin"s time up to the present day, and examined these theses" assumptions regarding genes. It was claimed in the article that the book The Selfish Gene, published in 1976 by the confirmed atheist and Darwinist zoologist Richard Dawkins, had resolved various points that these theses had tripped up over. In the book, Dawkins says: "We are survival machines--robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as genes." This article is a response to the evolutionist theses considered in the Focus article, and reveals that genes represent an insoluble dilemma both for Dawkins" claims and for the theory of evolution in general.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Tale Of Parallel Evolution In Science</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147948</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Science magazine carried an article titled "Parallel Evolution Is in the Genes," by the researchers Hopi E. Hoekstra and Trevor Price, in its 19 March 2004 edition. (1) The authors described how similar plumage coloration and patterning could be observed among bird species assumed to have only very distant evolutionary relationships, and then claimed that this was a result of parallel evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-03-19</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The ""99 %"" Myth Is Dead Evolutionists Admit That Humans and Chimps Are Not Genetically Similar</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147947</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[For a very long time, the evolutionist choir has been propagating the unsubstantiated thesis that there is very little genetic difference between humans and chimps. In every piece of evolutionist literature, you could read sentences like "we are 99 percent equal to chimps" or "there is only 1 percent of DNA that makes us human". Although no conclusive comparison between human and chimp genomes has been done, the Darwinist ideology led them to assume that there is very little difference between the two species.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The BBC Web Site Continues with the Error of the Evolution of Speech</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147946</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article titled "Ape Gestures "show human links"" appeared on the BBC web site on 1 May, 2007. This considered bobo chimpanzees and the arm movements they use, and claimed that these shed light on the imaginary evolution of human speech. It repeated the classic evolutionist scenarios on the subject of the evolution of speech, originated from the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, and reflected a propaganda technique of the academy.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-05-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Pair of Fossils Have Demolished the Evolutionary Family Tree</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147945</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A scenario that evolutionists describe as a &amp;#8220;scientific fact&amp;#8221; in text books and that they have attempted to pass off to millions of people as the history of mankind in museums, has been demolished by the latest palaeoanthropological discoveries. Findings to the effect that Homo habilis and Homo erectus, human beings&amp;#8217; supposed evolutionary ancestors, actually lived at the same time have irrevocably done away with the hypthesis that the one evolved from the other. Details of the discovery in question were published in the evolutionist British magazine Nature.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-08-09</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Scientific American"s Propaganda ""Collection"" 2</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147944</link>
						  <description><![CDATA["Food For Thought"
We have already responded to this article which contained speculation concerning the alleged role of nutrition in evolution. You can read that response here.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Scientific American"s Propaganda ""Collection"" 1</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147943</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The well-known US science magazine Scientific American devoted its July "special" edition, once again, to the "special" mission it has so far undertaken with such great sensitivity: spreading the materialist dogma-based theory of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>An Analysis of a Typical Piece of Darwinist Propaganda: NTVMSNBC.COM, 6 March 2004</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147942</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In this article we carry out an analytical study for our readers. 
Our aim is to contribute to our readers developing a critical perspective with regard to Darwinism, which is defended as a dogma in modern science.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-03-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A New Page in the History of Evolutionist Fraud</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147941</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[It has emerged that an evolutionist professor of anthropology has been providing false information regarding the age of some key fossils for the last 30 years. The falsehoods of this professor, who was obliged to resign from his post in the wake of these developments, are currently described as &amp;#8220;facts&amp;#8221; in anthropology textbooks, and the authorities state that these need to be subjected to radical revisions.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A New Fossil Discovery Puts The Theory Of Evolution Yet In A Deeper Quandary</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147940</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its June 23, 2001 issue, Time magazine ran a story titled "One Giant Step for Mankind" by Michael D. Lemonick and Andrea Dorfman. This story was based on a discovery reported in the journal Nature. (12 Jul, 2001) However, the story of Time included obvious errors.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2001-06-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionary Tell Tales - 5 - BBC"s Evolution Of The Human Brain Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147939</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This part of the documentary The Human Body, prepared by BBC and broadcast on the NTV channel on November 6, 2002, dealt with the human brain. In this documentary, the information provided about the brain was supplemented with the usual evolutionist propaganda clichés, and the complexity in the human brain was described as a &amp;#8220;miracle of evolution.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2002-11-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionary Tell Tales - 4 - BBC"s Functionless Tissues Error In ITS Documentary ""The Human Body""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147938</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Another outdated evolutionist claim appeared in the documentary &amp;#8220;The Human Body&amp;#8221; by BBC which is broadcast on the NTV channel and introduces the systems in the human body. As it described the changes brought about in young people by puberty and hormones, oil glands in the skin were described as the source of spots. Yet it was also suggested that oil glands were a functionless piece of tissue serving no purpose, and that they were a legacy from man&amp;#8217;s so-called ape-like ancestors. This claim, devoid of any scientific foundation, is dealt with below.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionary Tell Tales - 3 -</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147937</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The blind evolutionist dogma again appeared in the documentary The Human Body, prepared by BBC and broadcast on NTV on October 9, 2002. This episode dealt with the birth process, and after describing the extraordinary events undergone by a baby in its mother"s body until birth it suggested that there was "no design" in all of these. As will clearly be seen after an examination of the proper accounts set out below, this claim is even more nonsensical than suggesting that a 100-storey building equipped with the most advanced technology could have formed itself in the middle of a city, with no designer or conscious builders involved.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2002-10-09</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionist Propaganda On The History Channel</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147936</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Towards the end of January, the History Channel television company embarked on evolutionist propaganda consisting of four programs. Interestingly enough, this propaganda was not limited to the History Channel, since other channels such as National Geographic and Discovery Channel stepped up their own evolutionist propaganda at exactly that same time.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-01-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The ""Mitochondrial  Eve"" Deception On The Discovery Channel</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147935</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Discovery Channel recently broadcast a documentary called "The Real Eve," in which imaginary scenarios were put forward regarding the spread of modern man, who allegedly emerged by means of evolution in Africa, to the rest of the world.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Errors Concerning Human Intelligence From The Discovery Channel</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147934</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The documentary &amp;#8220;Evolution: The Great Explosion in Intelligence&amp;#8221; broadcast on the Discovery Channel set out a number of Darwinist claims on the subject of human intelligence and culture. Considerable space was devoted to the views of such unrepentant Darwinist scientists as Steven Pinker and Richard Dawkins. This paper examines these Darwinist views and sets out the distortions behind them.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Discovery Channel"s Error About The Human Brain</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147933</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Recently the Discovery Channel showed a documentary titled &amp;#8220;Understanding The Amazing Human Brain,&amp;#8221; in which the functioning of the brain was investigated. Brain operations on some patients, the various brain areas&amp;#8217; functions as well as the awesome processing power of the brain were being examined. The Discovery Channel contended that the brain&amp;#8217;s amazing design was &amp;#8220;the zenith of millions of years of continuous evolution.&amp;#8221; In this article we will show the Discovery Channel&amp;#8217;s faults with regards to the human brain.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Tell Tales from The National Geographic Channel</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147932</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The documentary &amp;#8220;Humans: Who Are We?&amp;#8221; which is currently being broadcast on the National Geographic Channel (NGC), consists of the best-known scenarios of the myth of evolution. The scientific errors and deceptions in the documentary are explained below.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The National Geographic Tv"s Evolution Of Speech Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147931</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The National Geographic Channel aired on April 11, 2003 the &amp;#8220;Journey Of Man&amp;#8221; documentary which explored the evolution of language by misrepresenting the findings of philology. In this present article we refute this evolutionist position.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-11</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Ape-Man Myths From National Geographic Tv</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147930</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On April 9, 2003, National Geographic TV aired a documentary by the name of "The Birth of Human Mind". The film engaged in suggestion with stories about human evolution and showed pictures of ape-men in costumes climbing trees or looking nervously around as they walked through fields covered in tall grass. Some of them made muttering noises while others scavenged on the corpses of dead animals. In recounting its tall tales of evolution National Geographic made the maximum use of all methods of misleading its audience. This imaginary biological process, "evolution" in other words, devoid of any scientific validity, was proposed in a manner which was itself a complete violation of science.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-09</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>One More Time: From National Geographic Tv: The Evolution Of Speech Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147929</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The documentary series "Lost Worlds," broadcast by National Geographic TV, continued on April 16, 2003 with the episode "Human Invasion." The program contained speculation regarding the last 50,000 years of the so-called evolution of man and called on interpretations by various evolutionists.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-16</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>""The Oldest Human Footprints"" Error By The New Scientist And Hurriyet Science Magazines</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147928</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The New Scientist and Hurriyet Science magazines printed articles about human footprints found on volcanic grounds in Italy. New Scientist published the news with the headline "Earliest Human Footprints Preserve Prehistoric Trek" on the 15th of March 2003 and Hurriyet Scientist used the headline "Oldest Footprints Of Our Ancestors" on the 29th of March 2003. In this present article, we will reveal facts about human footprints and the biased evolutionist interpretation of the subject by the aforementioned magazines.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>An Unscientific Propaganda Interview By Die Zeit</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147927</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In relation with the German Die Zeit newspaper, Hurriyet Science magazine dealt with human evolution scenarios in its March 29, 2003 issue. In an article titled "Where does humanity come from where does it go" the famous evolutionist Phillip Tobias" interview with the Die Zeit was partially reprinted.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-29</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolution of Mammals Propaganda from the BBC</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147926</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report carried on the BBC web site on 24 March, 2007, titled &amp;#8220;Mammal Rise &amp;#8216;Not Linked&amp;#8217; to Dinos,&amp;#8221; discussed how the fictitious evolution of mammals was linked to dinosaurs becoming extinct. This report, in which we again encountered the familiar methods employed by the BBC, was once again a propaganda text far removed from the scientific evidence.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-03-24</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Myth of Bird Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147925</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Recently, a 140-million-year-old fossil called Shenzhouraptor sinensis was discovered in the Yixian region of China. According to the evolutionary paleontologist Ji Qiang, this fossil was a missing link between dinosaurs and birds. The fact is, however, that this fossil possesses features that clash with the evolutionists" claims about the origin of birds. Not just this fossil, but also the whole body of paleontological data on the subject is at odds with the evolutionary theory. "The evolution of birds", like other claims made by Darwinism, is no more scientific than a fairy tale.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Flawless Flying Machines: Birds</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147924</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Man has always dreamed of being able to fly, and down the years many people have sought ways of doing so. Yet it was not until the 20th century that they finally succeeded. Flying machines with advanced technology emerged at the end of long years of research and experiment. However, the techniques employed by man are really very primitive compared to the flight machines in nature.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Hurriyet Science Magazine"s ""The Evolution Of Files"" Nonsense</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147923</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The March 22 edition of Hurriyet Science magazine carried an article titled &amp;#8220;How Do Flies Fly?&amp;#8221; This described the exceptional maneuvering capability of flies and reported that attempts were under way to develop new flying machines by imitating them. Hurriyet Science magazine explained how very complex fly flight was and how even the most advanced technology had proven unable to develop a machine with the same maneuverability as these insects, and generally heaped praise upon that flight.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>New Fossil Discoveries Pose A New Dilemma For The Theory Of Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147922</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The February 21, 2003, edition of Science magazine carried an article called "Separate evolutionary origins of teeth from evidence in fossil jawed vertebrates." Based on studies of a number of fish fossils from the Devonian Period, it was suggested in the article that teeth may have evolved at least twice. The aim of this paper is to set out the inconsistent aspects of this claim.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-02-21</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel"s Spider Dilenma</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147921</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On March 14, 2003, the Discovery Channel broadcast a documentary called &amp;#8220;World of Discovery: The Spider&amp;#8221; in Turkey. The documentary gives examples of the hunting techniques employed by various species of spider and stresses what a superior substance spider thread is.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel"s Feeline Fairy Tales</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147920</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Discovery Channel recently aired a documentary called "Discovery Journal," which considered the lives of various members of the cat family, and especially lions. From start to finish throughout the program the channel insisted on telling its viewers evolutionary fairy tales.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel And The Wonderful Colours Of Deep-Sea Creatures</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147919</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On April 4, 2003, the Discovery Channel broadcast a short, 10-minute presentation film after its program "Discovery with Children." The film introduced the program "Nature," in which viewers were invited to discover nature.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-04</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>3 Darwinist Documentaries And 3 Dogmatic Stories By The Discovery Channel</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147918</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Channels with a programming consisting mainly of documentaries like the National Geographic, Discovery Channel or the History Channel are known for their Darwinist approach. These channels tend to tuck in evolutionist terminology when the subject turns to life or the living beings. When talking about a species it goes like: &amp;#8220;evolved over millions of years,&amp;#8221; &amp;#8220;the struggle for survival made its evolution necessary,&amp;#8221; or &amp;#8220;developed this camouflage by the gift of evolution;&amp;#8221; everything is related in a manipulative manner to the viewer.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-28</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Evolution Of The Tasmania Tiger: A Blindly Defended Piece Of Darwinist Dogma</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147917</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On March 24, 2003, the Discovery Channel broadcast a documentary called &amp;#8220;End of Extinction: Cloning the Tasmanian Tiger.&amp;#8221; The subject matter of this documentary was the efforts being made to clone the extinct Tasmanian tiger thanks to a jawbone which had been preserved unspoiled in a solution of alcohol for the last 140 years.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-24</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel"s Concealment Of The Truth About The Fruit Fly</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147916</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A documentary called "Super Fly" was broadcast on the Discovery Channel on April 11, 2003. The program dealt with the role played by fruit flies of the species Drosophilia melanogaster in the development of genetic science. A number of important scientific advances in various genetic studies in which the fruit fly was used were described, beginning with the research by a scientist called Thomas H. Morgan in the early 1900s and continuing up to the present day. However, the Discovery Channel once again revealed in this program its habit of using every living thing it describes as a vehicle for evolutionist propaganda. What is more, it did so by offering fictitious accounts and concealing the facts.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-11</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel"s Tell Tales Of Elephant Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147915</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On April 7, 2003, the Discovery Channel aired a documentary called "Ultimate Guide: Elephants." The lives of these giant creatures on the plains of Africa were described to the accompaniment of the most impressive images, and striking information was provided concerning them.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Whale Fantasy From National Geographic</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147914</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[National Geographic is popularly regarded as an important scientific magazine that carries out research all over the planet and shares the results with its readers. The magazine is a major source of information in a great number of important areas, yet few readers are aware of the extent to which it passes this information through an ideological "filter" before handing it on to its readers, and sometimes even twists the data according to the demands of this ideology and builds-up completely imaginary stories.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic Tv"s Undersea Fairy Tales</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147913</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A documentary called "Built for the Kill" has been screened on National Geographic TV. On the one hand, the program described some of the techniques used by sea creatures to hunt or evade capture, and on the other it sent out Darwinist messages by describing some creatures as "programmed to kill" or "ruthless killers."]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic&#8217;s Cat&#8217;s Eye Myth</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147912</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A documentary called "Killer Instinct: Grassland " was aired on the National Geographic TV channel on March 23, 2003. Examples are given in that documentary of various animals living on the African plains, and the program particularly deals with relationships between hunter and hunted out on the veldt. The most "practical" method in the attempt to impose the theory of evolution on society emerged during this documentary.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>No Sign Of Evolution In 160-Million-Year Salkamender Discoveries</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147911</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Nature magazine carried an article called "The Earliest Known Grown-Group Salamanders" in its March 27, 2003 edition. The story concerned the finding of a large number of salamander fossils in China, which were established as belonging to the Middle Jurassic Period. Researchers Ke-Qin Gao and Neil H. Shubin presented various salamanders which had been covered in lava as the result of a sudden volcanic eruption and which had thus been splendidly preserved. The salamander in the lava had been so well preserved that soft tissue such as the eye and gills and even the last things they had eaten in their stomachs could all be identified.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Latest In The Evolution Of Beetles: Tales In A Tale</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147910</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Bilim ve Teknik (Science and Technology) magazine in its April 2003 issue and the Hurriyet Bilim (Hurriyet Science) magazine on the 5th of April 2003 reported a research project published in the Science magazine on the 21st of March 2003. Both, Hurriyet Bilim (Hurriyet Science) and Bilim ve Teknik (Science and Technology), took it upon themselves to defend Darwinism again and did so by storytelling as usual, difference being that in these articles they enriched an old tale considerably. The Darwinists looked once more at the DNA of some creatures and interpreted them as they wanted to understand them, thereby creating new tales. This time they enriched them even further to create the tale of the evolution of the beetles.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-05</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The ""Coincidental Champions"" Error By The Animal Planet Channel</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147909</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Animal Planet channel showed a documentary by the name &amp;#8220;The Wild Nature"s Champions&amp;#8221;. The program suggested that the zebra&amp;#8217;s characteristics and clever behavioral pattern was the product of evolution. In this article, we will demonstrate the scientific invalidity of this claim.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Paul Davies&#8217; Desperate Case for a &#8220;Multiverse&#8221;</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147908</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its April 12, 2003, edition, The New York Times carried an article by the famous astrophysicist Paul Davies entitled &amp;#8220;A Brief History of the Multiverse.&amp;#8221; In this article, Prof. Davies attempts to defend the claim that there may be an infinite number of universes, and our universe chanced to be suitable for life, which is the latest argument in which materialist thinkers have sought refuge in the face of the finely tuned design in the universe.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-12</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet"s ""Evolution Engineering"" Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147907</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A documentary called &amp;#8220;Cheetah: Cat in Crisis&amp;#8221; was broadcast on the television channel Animal Planet on March 26, 2003. The programme dealt with various initiatives by wildlife volunteers to save the cheetah, whose numbers are falling rapidly. The factors underlying the drop in population were also considered, and it was explained how African livestock raisers played an important role in this.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinism Is On The Retreat, And Can No Longer Deceive The World!</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147906</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinism claims that intermediate fossils exist, when they do not ... It offers invalid "proofs." All the fossils discovered clearly verify creation, but it maintains just the opposite. It seeks to persuade us that great artists and brilliant scientists came into existence through a chance arrangement of proteins; the odds against that ever happening are 1 in 10950 - in other words, impossible. It even seeks to convince us that university professors who thus emerged do research on how they, themselves, came into being by chance!]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The BBC"s Insect Eye Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147905</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The sublime creation in nature continues to attract the attention of and inspire scientists. The latest research in this field concerned a modelling study conducted in order to understand the system in the bee eye. Scientists from University of California in the USA succeeded in placing an artificial eye imitating the bee eye and consisting of more than 8500 hexagonal lenses in an area the size of a pin head.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Deficient Basis Of The Darwinist Propaganda</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147904</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[21- Why does the use of evolutionists" quotations make evolutionists so uneasy?
Many quotations representing admissions by evolutionists are used on our web site.
For example: 
No matter how large the environment one considers, Life cannot have had a random beginning.1]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolution Of Mammals: A Dogma Defended By The National Geographic At All Costs</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147903</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The National Geographic published in its APRIL 2003 issue an article titled &amp;#8220;The Rise of Mammals.&amp;#8221; In this rather long article decorated with imaginary evolution trees and pretty pictures, the author, Rick Gore, put forward evolutionist speculations on the origin of mammals, one of the darkest corners in the house of the evolution theory. The magazine listed and classified extinct species for their various characteristics and asserted that they represented the stages in the long process of the mammals&amp;#8217; evolution without providing even a hint of a scientific explanation therefore.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why Doesn"t Evolutionist Propaganda Work Any More?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147902</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Discovery Channel is persistently airing programs which spread propaganda on the theory of evolution, presenting this theory to the public cloaked as if it were scientific fact, even though in truth it is utterly lacking in validity.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Thermodynamics Falsifies Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147901</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which is accepted as one of the basic laws of physics, holds that under normal conditions all systems left on their own tend to become disordered, dispersed, and corrupted in direct relation to the amount of time that passes. Everything, whether living or not, wears out, deteriorates, decays, disintegrates, and is destroyed. This is the absolute end that all beings will face one way or another, and according to the law, the process cannot be avoided.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Scientists Confirm the Signs of God</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147900</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The attributes of the universe discovered by science point to the existence of God. Science leads us to the conclusion that the universe has a Creator and this Creator is perfect in might, wisdom and knowledge. It is religion that shows us the way in knowing God. It is therefore possible to say that science is a method we use to better see and investigate the realities addressed by religion.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>YET ANOTHER CRACK IN THE WALL In Ohio, Criticism of Evolution Gets into School Curriculum</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147899</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinism is steadily loosing ground in the United States and a clear example of this has been the recent entry of criticism against the theory into textbooks in some states. Georgia, as we have noted in our Media Watch article, Another Crack in the Wall: Schools in Georgia (US) are Allowed to Teach about Creation, was the first state to challenge Darwinist dogmatism and include critical analysis in its curriculum. More recently, the Ohio State Board of Education required Ohio students to learn about the evidence against Darwin"s theory of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>ANOTHER CRACK IN THE WALL Schools In Georgia (US) Are Allowed To Teach About Creation</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147898</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinism is a theory that is supported for the sake of materialist philosophy. This is the main reason behind the zealotry of Darwinists in countering the criticisms against their theory. For a long time, especially in the Western world, critics against the theory of evolution has been assaulted by several means: media propagated against them, they lost their jobs in schools, courts ruled against teaching theories other than evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolution And Thermodynamics An Important Quote from Ilya Prigogine</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147897</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Ilya Prigogine 
The origin of life has been one of the deepest deadlocks of Darwinism. A century of scientific research - and common sense - reveal that there are no mechanisms or laws in nature to organize simple molecules into a living cell. In fact as the Second Law of Thermodynamics proposes, the molecules on Earth would naturally tend to disorganize; which means an increase in entropy.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinism"s Contradiction With Religion</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147896</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In our day, some circles hold the view that Charles Darwin"s theory of evolution does not contradict with religion, and that those who renounce the theory of evolution unnecessarily promote it. This view, however, includes many misconceptions. It is the result of a failure to grasp the main tenet of Darwinism and the extremely dangerous outlook it mandates.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>An Appeal To Reason</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147895</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The origin of life, which is to say, the question of how the first living things came into being on Earth, is one of the biggest dilemmas confronting materialists in the last century and a half. Why should that be so? It"s because even a single living cell, the smallest unit of life, is incomparably more complex than even the greatest technological achievements of the human race. The laws of probability make it clear that not even a single protein could ever have come into existence by mere chance; and if this is true of proteins-the most basic building-blocks of cells-the accidental formation of a complete cell is not even thinkable. This is of course proof of creation.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionary Tell Tales From BBC - 2 -</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147894</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The evolutionist propaganda on BBC continued, with the documentary The Human Body, telling its viewers tall tales about evolution, without offering a scrap of scientific evidence.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Smuggling Incident National Geographic Tv Declined To Cover</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147893</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Two documentaries called "Dinosaur Dealers" were recently broadcast on National Geographic TV. These dealt with the trade in fossils and fossil smuggling, and described the adventures of a paleontologist who followed in the tracks of a number of stolen fossils, or fossils smuggled out of Australia. The trail was followed, just like a detective would, and the program showed the negotiations carried out in order to trap the smugglers. The impression was thereby given that National Geographic is an idealistic body, chasing hot on the heels of the smugglers and striving with all its might to destroy this illegal trade. However, the TV channel failed to mention that just a few years ago it too was involved in the smuggling of an Archaeoraptor fossil (and the fraud that accompanied it). In fact, it said not a word about it]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Series Of Blunders Regarding Monkey Intelligence From National Geographic Tv</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147892</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[National Geographic TV last week broadcast two documentaries. Called "A Tale of Three Chimps" and "My Favorite Monkey," these documentaries bore clear similarities in terms of the message they sought to give. The consecutive broadcasting of these documentaries by National Geographic TV, their subject matter and timing indicated that deliberate evolutionist propaganda was going on. This channel, which last month brought us the fairy tales of "the dog that entered the sea and became a whale" and "the fish that left the sea and grew legs"" in its "Great Transformations," screened last month, this time offered us another story and tried to inculcate the suggestion of the alleged evolution of man.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic TV"s ""Monkey-Brain"" Myths</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147891</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On April 4, 2003, National Geographic TV broadcast a documentary called "The Cleverest Ape in the World." The documentary represented one of the elements of the recently accelerated evolutionist propaganda focusing on monkeys.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-04</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Talking Ape Myth From National Geographic TV Claims Which Fly In The Face Of Science (12 April 2003)</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147890</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In the documentary "The Cleverest Ape in the World," broadcast by the National Geographic TV channel, it was claimed that monkeys can speak like human beings. Throughout the program, chimpanzee behavior similar to that of man was put forward as a basis proving evolution. It went even further, and maintained that chimps actually think like human beings. In one study cited an orangutan was able to communicate with its trainer by means of signs. It was claimed that this communication was a primitive language. In the commentary section these observations were suggested as sufficient for regarding monkeys as relatives of man. The invalidity of this claim is dealt with below in the light of the scientific literature.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-12</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>New Scientist Must Stop Presenting Outmoded 1960S Theories As ?f They Were Scintific Fact</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147889</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[New Scientist magazine carried an article called &amp;#8220;Together We Are Stronger&amp;#8221; in its March 15, 2003 edition. Written by James Randerson, the article appeared under the following box caption: &amp;#8220;Was Darwin wrong? Wherever you look, it"s cooperation not selfishness that reigns supreme.&amp;#8221; In other words, an attempt was being made to portray a fact which represented a terrible dilemma for the theory of evolution as if it were actually evidence in support of the theory.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Scientific American"s 15 ERRORS Harun Yahya"s Answer to John Rennie, editor in chief of Scientific American</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147888</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its July, 2002 issue, the magazine Scientific American published an article titled "15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense." Yet that aggressive piece of writing actually contained no scientific answers to creationism at all, and merely demonstrated the fanaticism and bigotry of the Darwinist establishment]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2002-07-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Error And Misrepresantstion Of Ape Intelligence By The National Geographic TV</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147887</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The National Geographic TV aired on the April 3, 2003 a program called &amp;#8220;Who is Aping Who?: Hearts and Minds.&amp;#8221; Central to this programs storyline were, as always, some well-trained apes. The National Geographic TV was relating information about these apes as if they were people and went on to speculate about these beings&amp;#8217; emotions and thoughts but the really striking thing about it all was that the whole thing was geared to have an emotional impact on the viewer. In this article we are going to bare the emotional blackmail the National Geographic TV resorts to in order to have the viewer believe the tale about humans and chimpanzees being close relatives.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-03</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Apes Copying Humans Does Not Constitue Evidence For Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147886</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In the documentary, &amp;#8220;Who is Aping Who?: Bringing up Baby&amp;#8221; by the National Geographic TV, people and apes were once more brought together and compared: purpose being to prove evolution by basing it on behavioral similarities.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Cambrien Deadlock Of Evolutinists Is Getting Broader</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147885</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its February 1999 issue, the prominent science magazine TIG dealt with the issue of Cambrian period, one of the greatest deadlocks of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>1999-02-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Evolution Tales Of Ancient Lakes By The Science Magazine</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147884</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Bilim ve Teknik (Science and Technique) magazine published in its April 2003 issue an article titled "Life in the Old Ponds Highlight Origin of Species." It was based on an article published by the American Science magazine on the 31st of January 2003 in which, the habitat of Lake Baikal (Asia) and Lake Victoria (Africa) with its variety life forms was misconstrued and claimed that the life forms in the lakes were in a process of ongoing diversification and supposed evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionary Tell Tales From BBC -1-</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147883</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The documentary The Human Body, taken from the BBC and broadcast by NTV, was full of intense propaganda intended to impose the theory of evolution on viewers. Yet this propaganda served no other purpose than to prove that the theory of evolution is nothing but an unscientific myth.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2002-11-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>New Scientist&#8217;s Multicellular"s Evolution Dreams</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147882</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In the Ediacara region of South Australia referred to, a larIn its April 12 2003 issue, the magazine New Scientist published an article headlined: &amp;#8220;Ice Magic.&amp;#8221; In the article, one of the matters which is amongst the greatest problems of the theory of evolution is considered and speculation is set forth about the so-called evolutionary origins of multicellular organisms.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-12</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The &#8220;Clash of Civilizations&#8221; is the Product of a Darwinist Mindset</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147881</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The cartoon caricature recently published in Denmark, which has caused such distress throughout the Islamic world, has once again raised the claim of a &amp;#8220;clash of civilizations,&amp;#8221; whose flames have been so persistently stoked by certain circles. The caricature in question and the idea of a clash of civilizations are nothing more than reflections of the dark mental framework, tending towards violence, of Darwinist and materialist circles.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Fall Of Ateism</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147880</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[There are significant turning points in the history of mankind. We are now living in one of them. Some call it globalization and some say that this is the genesis of the &amp;#8220;information age.&amp;#8221; These are true, but there is yet a more important concept than these. Although some are unaware of it, great advances have been made in science and philosophy in the last 20-25 years. Atheism, which has held sway over the world of science and philosophy since the 19th century is now collapsing in an inevitable way.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Evolution Deceit</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147879</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Every detail in this universe points to a superior creation. On the other hand, materialism, which seeks to deny the fact of creation in the universe, is nothing but an unscientific fallacy.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The History Channel&#8217;s Darwinist And Atheist Propaganda</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147878</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The television channel known as the History Channel is broadcasting a film called Biography, which deals with the life and views of Charles Darwin. In this film, Charles Darwin"s unscientific views are defended on the basis of no evidence at all, as if they were proven fact, and there is at the same time open atheistic propaganda. The fact that a channel such as the History Channel, which claims to give viewers the historical and scientific truth, should devote space to Darwinist views, which are in no way compatible with the scientific facts, casts a shadow over its credibility.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>New Speculation around Tyrannosaurus Rex Fossils</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147877</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The second week in April saw evolutionist publications engaging in intense speculation about a false intermediate form. Fossil belonging to the creature known as Tyrannosaurus rex was portrayed by evolutionists as a supposed intermediate form in the myth of dinosaurs turning into birds. In these days, when proofs revealing that evolution is a fantasy have emerged and Darwinism has irrevocably collapsed, this claim is a reflection of the terrible despair Darwinists are experiencing.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-04-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Refuse to Abandon Their Speculation about T. rex</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147876</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article titled "If T. Rex fell, how did it get up, given its tiny arms and low center of gravity?" carried on the Scientific American web site on 9 May, 2007, considered Tyrannosaurus rex, which Darwinists have for a long time insisted on regarding as an intermediate form. This fossil, which has been the subject of evolutionist conjecture because of various of its anatomical features, has been insistently proposed by Darwinists as evidence for the fictitious transition from reptiles to birds. However, hundreds of pieces of evidence refuting this claim have come to light, despite which attempts are still made to use T. rex for Darwinist propaganda.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-05-09</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists Are in Despair: Another Feathered Dinosaur Scenario</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147875</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Towards the middle of June, another report about evolution and a new fake fossil originating from the Associated Press was excitedly carried in such media organs as Nature, Science Daily, Discovery News, Cosmos, Yahoo News, Guardian Online, BBC News, and Scientific American. The way that a fossil that actually refuted the theory of evolution in many ways was depicted as evidence in favour of evolution was truly astonishing.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-06-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionist Deceptions Continue With The Arthropods In ""The Shape Of Life"" Documentary</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147874</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Conquerors episode of the documentary "The Shape of Life" dealt with the arthropods, suggesting that these creatures made the transition from sea to land and afterwards formed a separate category by developing wings and beginning to fly. Evolutionist scenarios, that have been disproved countless times by scientific research and discoveries, were repeated to the accompaniment of new images with no evidence being put forward to back them up.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Latest Dino-Bird Hype And The Facts</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147873</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Last week the world media trumpeted the recent discovery of a group of fossils in China as evidence supporting the theory of evolution. Beijing"s Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology issued a statement saying that one of the six fossils in the group belonged to a "dino-bird with four wings" and that this extinct creature was able to fly, or at least, glide down the trees. Darwinist media once again dug out its tired "birds-evolved-from-dinosaurs" propaganda, even though this theory has already been disproved thoroughly and repeatedly.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel&#8217;s T. Rex Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147872</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On March 24, 2003, the Discovery Channel broadcast a documentary called &amp;#8220; Valley of the T-rex. &amp;#8221; This considered a new theory about the carnivorous dinosaur species Tyrannosaurus rex, which lived between 85 and 65 million years ago. A paleontologist called Jack Horner, from the Rockies Museum in the state of Montana in the United States, suggested that rather than hunting its prey down, T. Rex actually ate the bodies of other dead animals. Viewers were told how T. Rex&amp;#8217;s eyes were too small (to hunt with), its forearms were too short (to grasp prey with) and its legs were too large (to chase its quarry). Based on these features, Horner maintained that T. Rex lacked the ability to chase down and seize its prey, for which reason it needed to be thought of as a scavenger.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-24</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Coelacanth Deception On The Discovery Channel</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147871</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A documentary called "Dinosaurs in the Deeps" was broadcast on the Discovery Channel on April 14, 2003. The program considered the fish Coelacanth and dealt with the reaction its rediscovery had awoken in the scientific world and the subsequent efforts to observe it in its natural environment. Yet the Discovery Channel used these fish, which have remained completely unchanged for the last 400 million years, as a tool of evolutionist propaganda and referred to the Coelacanth as "our ancestor."]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic"s Errors Regarding Gorilla Intelligence</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147870</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A documentary called "Planet of the Apes: Gorillas From the Heart of Darkness " was broadcast on the National Geographic TV channel on March 19, 2003. The film dealt with footage shot in natural surroundings by a Belgian serving as a diplomat in Rwanda in the 1960s. It showed footage taken by the diplomat, who remained in the country at the end of his posting, of the mountain-dwelling species known as the silverback gorilla.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-19</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Tales Of Transformation From National Geographic Television</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147869</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[National Geographic TV recently broadcast a documentary called &amp;#8220;Evolution: Great Transformations.&amp;#8221; It mainly concentrated on the origin of whales, and devoted considerable space to evolutionist claims regarding their transition from the sea to the land, together with comments concerning at which stages such transitions might have come about.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Scientific American "s Dino-Bird Errors</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147868</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Scientific American, one of the passionate proponents of the Darwinist theory, considered one of the theory"s popular claims in its March 2003 issue: the evolution of birds. An article by the ornithologists Richard O. Prum and Alan Brush titled "The Feather or the Bird, Which Came First?" reiterated the classical evolutionist thesis that birds evolved from dinosaurs with a new series of findings and hypotheses and dino-bird illustrations designed to visually influence the reader.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-03-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolution Propaganda By The Scientific American Magazine</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147867</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Scientific American magazine dedicated its special issue of April 2003 to the evolution propaganda. In this issue, there were reprints of articles which had appeared before, on of which, was on of the foremost propaganda materials: the dino-bird. The claims made in the article titled "The Origins Of Birds And Their Flight" by Kevin Padian and Luis M. Chiappe has been refuted previously on our website at http://www.darwinism-watch.com/scientific_american_dino_bird.html. (You may also see the following for further information: http://www.harunyahya.com/refuted6.php-)]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Focus Magazine"s Coelacanth Confessions</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147866</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An interesting article appeared in the April 2003 edition of Focus magazine. More than its actual content, the interesting thing about this article was its publication in Focus, a magazine known for its devotion to the theory of evolution, yet which still carried a report about the fish known as the coelacanth, "living proof" that totally undermines all the claims of the theory of evolution. Even more interesting was the manner the magazine dealt with the subject. Focus had no compunctions about setting out, one by one and in the most open manner, all the blows dealt to the theory of evolution by the coelacanth.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The (Expected) Fall Of The Microraptor Gui</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147865</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The National Geographic published a short article by Christopher P. Sloan titled &amp;#8216;the lord of wings&amp;#8217; in its May 2003 issue. Its subject was the discovery of the 130 million years old Microraptor gui fossils announced to the world in January 2003. At that time it was claimed that the fossil belonged to a four winged dinosaur, which was supposed to be gliding from tree to tree. This find was interpreted as evidence for the theory of birds having evolved from dinosaurs.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why does the use of evolutionists" quotations make evolutionists so uneasy?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147864</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Many quotations representing admissions by evolutionists are used on our web site.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionist Misconceptions with Genetic Engineering</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147863</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Genetic engineering is the field in which genes from an organism are isolated, manipulated and transferred into another organism. Thanks to these studies, scientists can produce bacteria that digest industrial waste, clone living creatures and develop plants resistant to insects and disease.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Scene and the Behind-the Scene: An Analysis of the Missing Link Play on Human Origins</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147862</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Much of the news about evolution we encounter most often in newspapers and on television are about human beings. There is much speculation about what anatomical and cultural changes hominids--supposed human ancestors--went through during the process of &amp;#8220;becoming human&amp;#8221; and what the basic causes of the alleged evolutionary development of human characteristics were, such as walking on two feet and possession of big-sized brain.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why the Theories of Scientific Materialists are Untenable from the Outset</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147861</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Materialist scientists reveal a very interesting contradiction with their titles. This is because it is simply not possible to ascertain the truth of the theories for which they claim a scientific basis. Materialists regard the mind--the source of their theories--as the product of brain chemistry. However, there is no logical reason for believing the truth of a theory that is accepted as a product of chemical reactions.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discussions Concerning Early Hominids [*]</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147860</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Three fossils (Orrorin tugenensis, Ardipithecus ramidus kadabba, Sahelanthropus tchadensis) discovered in the past few years have been attributed into the human evolution scenario; they have often been mentioned in some publications as discoveries that cast light on the supposed divergence of humans and chimpanzees. But these estimations are totally unrealistic in that they ignore the prejudice and the unclarity that surrounds the scenario of human evolution as well as heated discussions with regard to these fossils. In fact, these recent fossils inflamed the discussions on these ambiguities and dragged the human evolution scenario into more darkness.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>""Missing Link"" Headlines in the Media: An Unscientific Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147859</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Have you seen a newspaper headline announcing a fossil discovery in terms of the "missing link" having been found? In that case you can be 100% certain that the report you are reading is of absolutely no scientific value. The reason is simple: serious scientists decades ago accepted that the idea of a "missing link" and the evolutionary story-telling based on fossils are unscientific, and abandoned the use of the term.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionary ancestor-descendant propaganda is merely a bedtime story</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147858</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[One principle component in the propaganda of the fairy tale that species evolved from one another is the fossil species considered within an ancestor-descendant relationship. These relationships may assume concrete form in diagrams in which different species are located on the branches of a family tree, or in the words of a scientist interpreting the skulls laid out in a row on his/her desk. As fossils are interpreted within the scope of evolutionary lines of descent by these means, most people get the impression that such accounts represent scientific data obtained from fossils.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>What is the &#8220;Darwinist fairy tale&#8221; and why does it constitute no evidence for the theory of evolution?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147857</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The documentaries broadcast by such Darwinist TV channels as National Geographic TV and Discovery Channel share one point in common. These documentaries all contain imaginary conjecture as to why and/or how the biological structures or characteristics of a living thing may have evolved. The striking thing is that these accounts are told as facts while they are actually "artefacts" of evolutionists" imagination. Evolutionists seek to portray the scenarios they come up with in their own minds as if they were scientific evidence. Yet such deceitful accounts are nothing more than "Darwinist fairy tales" and they obviously represent no evidence for evolutionist claims.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Darwinists&#8217; Deceptive label: Convergent Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147856</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The term "convergent evolution" is used to describe the hypothetical evolution of similar structures in living things according to similar environmental requirements in independent processes. For example, one of the structures assumed by evolutionists to have emerged through convergent evolution is the wing.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Fantastical Evolutionary Propaganda: The Creatures of the Future</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147855</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Have you ever come across colored and eye-catching reconstructive drawings of imaginary creatures described as "hominid ancestors" as you turn the pages of an evolutionist publication? Did you know, however, that these images were based on a very limited and fragmentary fossil record? If your answer to these questions is "yes," then you must be aware that evolutionary propaganda is excessively based on imagination and eye-catching images.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Latest Dogmatic Evolutionist Myth Concerning the Origin of Birds: The Four-Winged Dinosaur (Microraptor gui)</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147854</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Completely speculative and forced interpretations are being made regarding feathered dinosaurs unearthed in China, and these are being depicted, with widespread media propaganda, as scientific facts.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why the Idea of Bird Evolution Is No Longer Tenable</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147853</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Evolutionists maintain that birds are descended from reptiles. There is no evidence for that claim, however. On the contrary, there is a great deal of evidence to show that such an evolution is impossible.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Irreducible Complexity of Wings Refutes Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147852</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Evolutionists maintain that birds evolved from reptiles. However, there are a number of factors which refute this. One of these is the very different surface structures of the two groups.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Complex Design and High Processing Capacity in the Human Brain</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147851</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[There is an exceedingly complex design in the human brain. At the basis of this design lies the fact that are large number of brain cells are linked to one another by a very large number of connections.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Evolution of the Human Brain: A Blindly Supported Darwinist Myth</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147850</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Evolutionists claim that man evolved from an ape-like ancestor and that during that imaginary process his brain also grew and developed. According to this view, the growth of the brain is a so-called evolutionary adaptation. Again according to this claim, random mutations and natural selection, bereft of any aim or purpose, are responsible for the alleged evolution of the brain. That which Darwinists most frequently resort to support these claims&amp;#8212;based on their own prejudices&amp;#8212;is the diagram of the skulls which they set out in order from small to large. A number of scientific sources frequently set this claim and these plans before us.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Unique Structure of Avian Lung Refutes Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147849</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Another factor demonstrating the impossibility of the reptile-bird evolution scenario is the structure of avian lungs, which cannot be accounted for by evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why the propaganda regarding the evolution of human intelligence is untrue</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147848</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Although human beings have certain biological similarities to other living things, only man has constructed civilisation. Mankind has established universities, hospitals, factories and states, composed music, held Olympic games and ventured into space, and has achieved all of these thanks to his intelligence. Evolutionists maintain that human intelligence assumed its present form by evolving during the period following the separation from his alleged closest relative, the chimpanzee.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why the &#8216;Primitive Neanderthal&#8217; Thesis is Invalid</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147846</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Neanderthal man, or Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, takes its name from the region in which it was first discovered (the Neander valley near the German city of Dusseldorf in 1856). It had a receding forehead, an unobtrusive jaw and large nose. It is believed to have disappeared, for unknown reasons, some 30,000 years ago. Even though the fact that Neanderthals were actually true human beings is now accepted by many evolutionists, others still tend to portray them as primitive cave-dwellers devoid of abstract thought. The fact is, however, that the many discoveries in recent years regarding the Neanderthal anatomy and culture have shown that this tendency is unfounded and that Neanderthals were a genuine human race.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-07-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why does the intelligent behaviour in monkeys not show that man evolved from apes?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147845</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Monkeys exhibit various forms of intelligent and social behaviour. Evolutionists point to the way monkeys manage to imitate human behaviour, and then construct similarities. Monkeys are claimed to be the closest animals to man in terms of intelligence, and these similarities are used by evolutionists as the basis for the claim that man evolved from apes. The fact is, however, that the idea that monkey intelligence and behaviour proves evolution is an invalid one, since there are countless creatures in nature which exhibit human-like behaviour despite being far removed from man.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why It Is Meaningless For Evolutionists To Use Australopithecus In Their Human Evolution Claims</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147844</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Evolutionists give the name Australopithecus, meaning &amp;#8216;southern ape,&amp;#8217; to man&amp;#8217;s first alleged ape-like ancestor. In fact, these creatures are nothing but an ancient extinct species of ape. Although various Australopithecus species have been found, only Australopithecus afarensis (represented by &amp;#8216;Lucy,&amp;#8217; put forward as proof of human evolution when discovered in 1974) is regarded as man&amp;#8217;s direct ancestor. Detailed analysis of Australopithecus fossils, however, have revealed that these were an ordinary species of ape.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Claim That Homo Erectus Was A Primitive Species Is Nothing But Prejudice</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147843</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Homo erectus means &amp;#8216;upright man.&amp;#8217; These humans possessed an identical skeletal structure to modern man, and like us were capable of walking upright. The reason why Homo erectus is considered &amp;#8216;primitive&amp;#8217; is the fact that its skull volume (900-1100 cc) is smaller than the modern human average (1400 cc) and its thick eyebrow protrusions. The fact is, however, that there are many human beings today with the same average skull dimensions as Homo erectus, and thick eyebrow protrusions can be found in various races today (as is the case with native Australians). The fact that the anatomical features of Homo erectus can still be seen today demonstrates that it is very definitely not a primitive species. In fact, many evolutionists now say that Homo erectus is a variation of Homo sapiens, in other words a true human being.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Gulf News: Do Not Be Taken in by the Computer Deception in Support of Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147842</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article entitled The Origin of Artificial Species appeared on the Gulf News internet site on May 20, 2003. In this article, Roger Highfield dealt with the work of Richard Lenski, Christoph Adami and their friends published in Nature magazine on computer simulations.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-20</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionary Psychology Tall Tales from New Scientist</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147841</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article titled "Human Nature: New rules for an old game" was carried in the May 24, 2003, edition of New Scientist magazine. The paper was most interesting from the point of view of revealing the inconsistencies to which evolutionists" errors and their blind devotion thereto have led them. The article contained an interview with Sarah Blaffer Hrdy, emeritus professor of anthropology from University of California. Unquestioning support for evolution was apparent right from the first question: "How have our views of primate behaviour changed over the past few decades?"]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-24</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Beware of the Darwinist prejudice of BBC and CBS News</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147840</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Last week there were two items on bbc.co.uk and cbsnews.com that contained some speculations and comments arising from evolutionist prejudices.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-09</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Fairy Tales Regarding The Evolution Of The Idea Of Beauty On Discovery Channel</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147839</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On August 13, 2003, the Discovery Channel broadcast a documentary called Science of Beauty. The documentary dealt with the alleged evolutionary development of the concept of beauty, and contained ever more nonsensical claims on the subject. It attached special importance to the views of evolutionary psychologists, but rather than being science what it related was actually a fairy tale. The illogicalities and unscientific claims in the documentary are set out below.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-13</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Another ""Just -So Story"" From The New York Times: Hair Loss</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147838</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The August 19, 2003, edition of the New York Times carried an article by Nicholas Wade called "Why Humans and Their Fur Parted Ways." In this article Wade enquired into the reasons why, unlike many mammals, man should be without fur, and dealt with this question in the framework of scenarios regarding human evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-19</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A New Darwinist Fantasy: The Evolution Of Meat-Eating</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147837</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A piece of research carried out by Peter Ungar from Arkansas University and his colleagues has recently hit the headlines. In the study, the tooth morphologies of Australopithecus afarensis and so-called evolutionarily primitive members of the genus Homo were compared. Ungar was seeking to develop a platform that would be useful in measuring the kind of abrasion brought about by which kinds of foods, forms of wear and the surfaces of the teeth he examined, and he evaluated the anatomical differences between the teeth studied from the point of view of feeding habits.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Genetic Similarity and Errors Regarding the Origin of Language on CNN.com</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147836</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On December 14, 2003 , Cnn.com published a report headed &amp;#8220;Study: Hearing, smelling differ in man, chimps.&amp;#8221; The report considered the analyses of human, chimpanzee and mouse genes performed by researchers from Cornell University and Celera Genomics in the USA , but interpreted the results from an evolutionist perspective.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-12-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>New Scientist"s Tale of ""Evolving with the Enemy""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147835</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The December 22, 2003, edition of New Scientist magazine carried an article called "Evolving with the Enemy." The article related the familiar relationship between certain people"s resistance to malaria and a mutation that affects the haemoglobin molecule, and went on to engage in evolutionist comments regarding this.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-12-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A New Fairy Tale about the &#8220;Evolution of the Brain&#8221; and Radikal&#8217;s Biased Coverage</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147834</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its 26 March 2004 edition the Turkish daily Radikal carried an article titled &amp;#8220;Man, A Genetic Error!&amp;#8221; The article concerned a new evolutionist claim put forward by University of Pennsylvania&amp;#8217;s Hansell Stedman and his team. The caption to the article read: &amp;#8220;The contribution of a &amp;#8216;genetic error&amp;#8217; to the development of mankind: The jaw shrank and made room for the brain when a gene was subjected to mutation 2.4 million years ago.&amp;#8221; According to the Radikal account, it was this mutation that lay behind human beings&amp;#8217; having such a large brain volume.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-03-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Myth of the Evolution of the Rejection of Love in New Scientist</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147833</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[New Scientist carried an article called &amp;#8220;Dumped&amp;#8221; in its 14 February 2004 edition. The article dealt with various experiments that had been performed on people who had fallen in love and separated. Emotions such as anger, hatred and disappointment in people suffering the pains of love and data from brain scans of the subjects were interpreted from an evolutionist perspective. The researchers who evaluated the harm and benefits to the organism of the depression suffered by such people all adopted the same approach to the subject. They had adopted evolution as a dogma and produced evolutionary fairy tales in such a way as to adapt the data they obtained from experiments and observations to fit this dogmatic perspective.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-02-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Support for Homosexuality by a Distortion of Science from New Scientist</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147832</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its 17 January 2004 edition, New Scientist carried an article titled &amp;#8220;Does Darwin&amp;#8217;s theory &amp;#8216;fall flat&amp;#8217; when it comes to homosexuality?&amp;#8221; In the article, ecologist Joan Roughgarden, a professor of biology at Stanford University in California, cited examples of homosexual behaviour observed in various animals and considered the lethal blow these deal to Darwin&amp;#8217;s theory of sexual selection.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-01-17</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Convergence Evolution Myth In Nature</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147831</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 22 April 2004 edition of Nature magazine carried an article titled "Developmental Genetics: Bittersweet Evolution." (1) Written by Günter Theißen, the article reported a study by Beverley Glover and her colleagues on the tomato and bittersweet, which was published in the journal Gene. (2) The report revealed that these two plants are identical in terms of the appearance of the organ known as the anther, which produces the flower"s pollen, but that mutation research has shown that these developed by different pathways.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-04-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Hurriyet Bilim"s Vestigial Darwinism</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147830</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Hurriyet Bilim, a supplement of the Turkish daily Hurriyet, used a long since discredited piece of Darwinist canard as the cover story for its June 12 edition. This canard in the article concerned, titled "18 Vestigial Organs in Our Bodies Set to Disappear." The "vestigial organs" thesis, proposed by Darwin in the 19th century and further developed by later proponents of his theory, has actually long since been discredited. The organs described as "vestigial" by Hurriyet Bilim have been discovered to have functions, and the idea of "vestigial organs" has even been abandoned by a number of evolutionist authorities.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-07-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Tale Of The Evolution Of Endurance Running</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147829</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A study published in Nature magazine examined the anatomical marvels of the human body that make endurance running possible.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-12-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The BBC Initiative To Resusciate The Myth Of Recapitulation</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147828</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The waste bin of history is full of theories the invalidity of which has been realised in the face of scientific evidence and which have been disproved by a great many scientists. Scientific research is a process which constantly tests theories in the light of the evidence, and which thus progresses. The interesting thing, however, is that some scientists appear to deliberately avoid engaging in research that could be beneficial to mankind or contribute to this &amp;#8220;progressing&amp;#8221; process. In an astonishing way, these people prefer to engage in theories that reside in the scientific waste bin and that have many times been shown to be invalid. Although such endeavours contribute nothing to science, they do allow the researcher in question the opportunity to appear in the media for once again raising theories that were once the subject of wide debate. This happened very recently on the BBC News web site, in a report titled &amp;#8220;Gill theory of human glands.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-12-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>An Evolutionist Fairy Tale About The Immune System</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147827</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On 7 July 2004, the Nature magazine website carried a report titled &amp;#8220;Immune systems evolved more than once.&amp;#8221; The article, written by Laura Nelson, described how it had been discovered that the fish-like creatures called lampreys possessed a different immune system to that of mammals. Judging from the lamprey metabolism, which rejects skin grafts, scientists had previously calculated that these creatures possessed an immune system, but there was no hint that they made antibodies.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-07-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Time"s Claim of Evolution Regarding Obesity: An Unscientific Myth</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147826</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Time magazine carried an article headed "How We Grew So Big" in its 7 June, 2004, edition. This article dealt with the subject of obesity, one of the main health issues facing present-day society, and offered information on such matters as obesity levels among various age groups, other health problems caused by obesity, and measures being taken against obesity by health organisations.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-06-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Mysteries of Life and Evolutionist Errors in New Scientist</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147825</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[New Scientist magazine published an article called "The Mysteries of Life" in its 4 September, 2004, edition. The article in question concentrated on the 10 most important questions that science has been unable to answer. However, the groundless evolutionist claims contained in the article were particularly striking. The claims in question are set out below, and we have added links through which you can read our responses to these.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-09-04</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Robert Martin&#8217;s Evolution Errors</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147824</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article titled &amp;#8220;Two new views on monogamy&amp;#8221; appeared in the 14 August, 2004, edition of the Turkish magazine Hurriyet Bilim. The article dealt with an interview conducted with Dr. Robert Martin, an anthropologist from the Field Museum of Natural History, at Chicago. Two evolutionist claims of Martin&amp;#8217;s set out in the article, and our response to them are briefly set out below.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-08-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionist Distortions Regarding Obesity On Newsweek</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147823</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Newsweek carried an article titled &amp;#8220;Darwin&amp;#8217;s Revenge&amp;#8221; in its 7 February, 2005, edition. The article was based on the idea that that excessive weight gain might be linked to migrations that took place some 30,000 years ago.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-02-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Errors In The 9 April, 2005, New Scientist</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147822</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The cover story of the 9 April, 2005, edition of New Scientist magazine bore the title &amp;#8220;Life&amp;#8217;s Top 10 greatest Inventions.&amp;#8221; The report resorted to evolutionist myths and maintained that the present order in the world formed as the result of phenomena in nature caused by blind chance and that man also came into possession of his present-day biological abilities by chance.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-04-09</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>An Example Of Classic Evolution Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147821</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its autumn, 2005, edition, Focus magazine published a short response to a question from a reader titled &amp;#8220;Was white skin an evolutionary  plus?&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-01-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The BBC&#8217;s Dogmatic Darwinism</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147820</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On its web site the BBC published a report titled &amp;#8220;Whale riders reveal evolution &amp;#8221;( 20 September 2005).The report discussed a genetic analysis carried out by University of Utah scientists. The scientists compared the DNA sequences of small parasitic crustaceans living on three species of whale called the &amp;#8220;right wales&amp;#8221;. Based on calculations of the differences they dreamed up the history of the imaginary evolution of the whale. They maintained that the three species of right whales evolved from a common ancestor 5-6 mi llion years ago]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-10-20</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Another Speciation Fairy Tale</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147819</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 22 November, 2005, edition of The New York Times carried a report headed &amp;#8220;In  Give and Take of Evolution, a Surprising Contribution from Islands.&amp;#8221; The subject matter of the article in question, written by the scientific writer Carl Zimmer, was a genetic sequencing analysis performed by American Museum of Natural History biologists.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-11-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Errors in James Watson&#8217;s ""Source of Information""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147818</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In the May 2003 issue of &amp;#8220;Bilim Ve Utopya&amp;#8221; (Science and Utopia) magazine, an article was published entitled, &amp;#8220;Yasamin Ruhsal Degil Moleküler Bir Temeli Vardir&amp;#8221; (The Basis of Life is Molecular not Spiritual). This title was based an interview conducted with James Watson whose findings on the spiral structure of DNA were published in &amp;#8220;Scientific American&amp;#8221; magazine. This article is a response to the errors that Watson has fallen into]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Irrational Claims In Scientific American About The Origin Of The Genetic Code</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147817</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its April 2004 edition Scientific American magazine carried an article co-authored by bioinformatics* expert Stephen J. Freeland and evolutionary geneticist Laurence D. Hurst.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-04-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Widening Genetic Gap ""The comprehensive analys is of the chimpanzee genome reveals a greater genetic difference from humans</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147816</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The chimpanzee joins the group of animals whose genomes have been deciphered by scientists. The data from the chimp genome was compared to its human counterpart by an international research consortium, whose studies have been published in Nature. (1) According to the findings of the consortium, humans shared many genes with chimpanzees, but there were very important differences as well. In fact, this first comprehensive genetic comparison triples the percentage of differences suggested by previous studies that relied on partial genome analysis. The latest percentage of genetic similarity is 96% in comparison to previous ones reported about 98.5%.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-01-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>New Scientist"s Error regarding The Chimpanzee Genome</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147815</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report titled &amp;#8220;Here&amp;#8217;s looking at you, chimp&amp;#8221; was published in the 24 December, 2005, issue of New Scientist magazine. The report carried details regarding the studies to decipher the chimpanzee genome. New Scientist, which has adopted as a dogma the scenario of humans and chimpanzees separating from a common ancestor 6 million years ago, suggested that comparative analyses of the genomes of these two life forms would illuminate the details of the fictitious evolutionary process.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-12-24</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Focus Magazine"s Microevolution Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147814</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The January 2006 edition of the Turkish magazine Focus carried a report titled &amp;#8220;Penguins prove climate change speeds up evolution.&amp;#8221; The brief report described a study conducted by Professor David Lambert from Massey University in New Zealand, who compared the DNA he obtained from the remains of animals. These remains he maintained were the 6000-year-old ancestors of the Adelie penguins in the Antarctic. He compared this ancient DNA with DNA taken from today&amp;#8217;s penguins. The scientist determined a number of minor differences. The Focus report sought to give the impression that this constituted evidence for what evolutionists refer to as &amp;#8220;microevolution&amp;#8221; and describe as &amp;#8220;small scale change.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-02-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionist Errors Regarding the Sea Urchin Genome</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147813</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its December 2006 issue the Turkish magazine Bilim ve Teknik (Science and Technology) carried a report headed &amp;#8220;The Sea Urchin Genome Confirms that We Are Related!&amp;#8221; The article in question, based on a news release from the American Association for the Advancement of Science, reported the results of a genome analysis of the sea urchin published in the journal Science. The article was misleading because it presented fictitious speculation as scientific fact by interpreting the results obtained in the light of the hypotheses of the evolutionary theory. This paper explains how, contrary to what is claimed, the results of the genome study do not support the theory of evolution and are merely dogmatic interpretations based on a prejudiced perspective.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-12-10</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Studies to Synthesise Cell in the Laboratory Support Creation</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147812</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article called &amp;#8220;Transitions from Nonliving to Living Matter&amp;#8221; was published in the 13 February 2004 edition of Science magazine. 1 Written by Steen Rasmussen of the Los Alamos National Laboratory and his colleagues, the article dealt with theses regarding studies of artificial life forms discussed at two international workshops. It stated that a life form capable of synthesis in the laboratory would perhaps be smaller than the smallest bacterium and would be quite different from any extant or extinct form of life, and provided information about studies being carried out to that end and the methods employed.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-02-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Stage And Backstage In The Supposition Of Man"s Evolution -Samples From The Scientific The Scientific American</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147811</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Much of the evolution material confronting us frequently in newspapers and on TV screens is to do with humankind. There is a fair amount of speculation on the transitions of the supposed ancestors of man, the hominoids, in terms of anatomy and culture and the causes of and reasons for human qualities like a large brain and upright walking. Speculating on feeding habits by looking at fossil teeth and how this could have affected the evolution of the species or going by the geographical distribution of discovered fossils, speculating on where on earth mankind originated from and by what ways they spread around is common practice]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Time Magazine&#8217;s Homo sapiens idaltu Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147810</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report in the June 12, 2003, edition of Nature magazine of the discovery of a skull in the African country of Ethiopia also appeared in Time magazine. An article titled &amp;#8220;The 160,000-Year-Old-Man&amp;#8221; in the June 23, 2003, edition of the magazine was the work of the Darwinist scientists Michael D. Lemonick and Andrea Dorfman. The article deals with pro-evolutionary speculation, despite the fact that the skull is no different to that of modern man, and Time magazine engaged in evolutionist propaganda by portraying these subjective interpretations as if they were scientific fact.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-12</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>""Who Were The Neanderthals?""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147809</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Prepared by Kate Wong, a Scientific American science writer, this comprised a wide-ranging file on the Neanderthals. Published in Scientific American"s special edition, it provided information about the anatomy, culture and behavior of these people who lived in Europe and Western Asia for more than 200,000 years; and comparisons between them and Homo sapiens were made. Space was also devoted to various views held by scientists on whether or not Neanderthal genes are to be found in modern human beings, and an answer was sought to the question of whether these humans were capable of symbolic thought.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Articles ""Out Of Africa Again...Again?"" And ""The Multiregional Evolution Of Humans""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147808</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The article "Out of Africa" was written by Ian Tattersall, curator in the Department of Anthropology of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. In his article he produced the scenario whereby modern man emerged in Africa and replaced other humans by spreading from there to Asia and Europe.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Discovery Channel Continues With Its Evolution Deception In The Face Of Scientific Discoveries</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147807</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A documentary by the name of "The Fate of The Neanderthal Man" was recently screened by Discovery Channel Turkey. Throughout the program there was intense evolutionist propaganda, with Neanderthal Man being referred to as a kind of ape-man.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic TV And The History Channel"s Neanderthal Errors</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147806</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Documentaries recently broadcast on National Geographic TV and the History Channel dealt with the Neanderthals, an ancient human race. National Geographic"s program was called "Neandertal Enigma," and the History Channel"s "The Fate of the Neanderthals." The programs dealt with when and where the Neanderthals had lived and their cultural and anatomical features.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>CNN Turk"s Errors A Scientific Refutation of the Documentary ""Walking with Cavemen""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147805</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[At the end of December 2003, the television channel CNNTurk announced that it would be screening a documentary called &amp;#8220;Walking with Cavemen.&amp;#8221; In its previews of the documentary CNNTurk showed actors dressed in ape-man costumes, thus clearly favouring the theory of evolution, which maintains that such &amp;#8220;ape-men&amp;#8221; were the ancestors of human beings.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-12-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Myths of the Transition to Bipedalism in Scientific American</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147804</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The February 2004 edition of Scientific American magazine carried an article headed "Good with Their Feet." Written by Blake Edgar, the article reviewed the book Upright by the Chair of Department of Anthropology, University of Southern California, Craig Stanford. In commenting on the so-called evolution-based theses of bipedalism of Stanford"s, who is also an evolutionist, Edgar refers to the transition to bipedalism as a historical fact, and the differences between the human and chimpanzee anatomies were described as the work of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-02-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>&#8220;Animal World &#8211; Humanzee&#8221;</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147803</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This documentary on the Animal Planet channel told the story of a chimpanzee called Oliver, various aspects of whose behaviour had once been the focus of interest of the evolutionist press. Evolutionist circles referred to Oliver as a "humanzee," a human-chimpanzee hybrid, because of certain abilities of his, such as walking upright and mixing drinks.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-01-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Headstrong Homo erectus Error IN Natural History Magazine</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147802</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The February 2004 edition of the magazine Natural History carried an article called "Headstrong Hominids." Based on a new book (1) by the anatomist Noel T. Boaz and the anthropologist Russell L. Ciochon, the article dealt with the cranial vault thickness of fossils that became known as Java Man and Peking Man and were later added to the Homo erectus category. The cranial thickness of the H. erectus skull fossils discovered in Asia was much greater than that of specimens found in other regions of the world.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-02-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The (Ignored) Debate On A Study On Neanderthal Tooth Development</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147801</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[New Scientist magazine carried a report titled "Neanderthals Had A Life Less Human" in its 1 May 2004 edition. The article reported on a claim about Neanderthal Man published in the British scientific magazine Nature.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-05-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Bone-Headed H. Erectus Tale In New Scientist</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147800</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The April 17, 2004 edition of New Scientist magazine carried an article titled "Brute of Dragon Bone Hill [*]." In the article anatomist Noel T. Boaz and anthropologist Russell L. Ciochon described their study concerning Asian Homo erectus, devoting space to a claim regarding the thickness of the H. Erectus skull based entirely on imagination. According to this claim, skull (or cranial vault) thickness developed in response to the many head blows received by H. erectus individuals during their frequent fights.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-04-17</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Homo Floresiensis And The Facts Emerging About The Evolution Myth (Also Avaliable in Indonesian)</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147799</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An excavation team under the leadership of Australian and Indonesian scientists have unearthed the remains of eight human beings of rather short stature and small brain volume in the Liang Bua cave on the Indonesian island of Flores. The fossils were ascribed the name Homo floresiensis (Flores Man) after the island on which they were discovered.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Important Developments Regarding Flores Man (Also Avaliable in Indonesian)</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147798</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[One important figure to announce his views is the Indonesian paleoanthropologist Teuku Jacob. An evolutionist, Jacob is head of the paleoanthropology laboratory at Gadjah Mada University. The institute is known for housing many fossils unearthed within the borders of Indonesia and ascribed to the fictitious evolution of man. In that regard, Jacob&amp;#8217;s words are of particular importance in opposing the evolutionist scenario concerning Homo floresiensis.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Errors On The BBC Regarding Latest Homo Erectus Finding</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147797</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report headed "Skull fuels Homo erectus debate" was published on the BBC web site on July 2, 2004. The article dealt with a fossilised skull unearthed in Kenya by the palaeontologist Richard Potts and his team, estimated to be some 900,000 years old and the debate over the category it belonged to.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-07-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The ?mportant Difference Between Human And Chimpanzee Chromosomes</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147796</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A study published in the latest edition of the British scientific journal Nature (1) compared the chimpanzee chromosome 22 with its equivalent, the chromosome 21 in humans. The study, performed by the International Chimpanzee Chromosome 22 Consortium, revealed important differences. The Nature news service announced the study under the headline "Chimp chromosome creates puzzles" and included the interpretation, "First sequence is unexpectedly different from human equivalent."]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-11-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Errors Of Science On Bipedalism</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147795</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 3 September 2004 edition of the journal Science carried a report of a special X-ray scanning study performed on Orrorin tugenensis fossil unearthed in Kenya at the end of 2000. (1) The striking point in the report was the way that words intended to give the impression that evolution was a scientific fact were sprinkled among the sentences.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-09-03</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Latest Ape Fossils And NTVMSNBC. COM"s Groundless Propaganda</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147794</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A Spanish research team led by the palaeontologist Salvador Moyà-Solà introduced a fossil skeleton consisting of 83 bones in the 19 November 2004 issue of Science magazine. 1 The fossil, discovered near the Spanish village of Els Hostalets de Pierola, was given the name Pierolapithecus catalaunicus, after the region in which it was found. Its age was said to be around 13 million years, and it was announced on Ntvmsnbc.com with the headline &amp;#8220;The last common ancestor of man and apes.&amp;#8221; This article will reveal the evolutionist errors in the Ntvmsnbc.com report and show why it is that the fossil constitutes no evidence for evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-11-19</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Latest Developments Regarding Flores Man</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147793</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The evolutionist claim that Homo floresiensis represents a separate species to modern-day man continues to retreat in the face of increasing objections. The Times Online, the Internet edition of The Times and The Sunday Times newspapers, summarised the latest developments on the subject in these terms]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>&#8220;The First Human&#8221;</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147792</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This programme dealt with the fossil finding Orrorin tugenensis. The finding consisted of 12 pieces of bone, discovered by a team led by the French researchers Brigitte Senut and Martin Pickford towards the end of 2000, and was thus described by the press as the &amp;#8220;Millennium Man.&amp;#8221; Although the researchers maintain that this being walked on two legs, this claim has not been fully accepted even by evolutionists.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-02-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Tale of the Evolution of Lice in the IHT</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147791</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 7 October, 2004, edition of the International Herald Tribune carried an article titled &amp;#8220;Evolution, as told by the louse.&amp;#8221; The article dealt with a study, performed by David Reed of the Florida Museum of Natural History, on the DNA sequences of head and body lice. Reed analyzed the DNA differences between the two clusters of lice. In the light of the results he obtained he claimed that these two split apart from an alleged joint ancestor some 1.18 million years ago.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-10-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Milliyet"s Support For Unscientific Reconstructions For The Sake Of Darwinism</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147790</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 8 April, 2005, edition of the Turkish daily Milliyet carried a story titled &amp;#8220;Our oldest &amp;#8216;ancestor&amp;#8217; is 7 million years old.&amp;#8221; The article in question concerned a last claim about fossil discovery made in Chad and announced to the world in 2002. The fossil was the bones known as the Toumai skull, the scientific name of which is Sahelanthropus tchadensis. 
Researchers applied a computer reconstruction to the skull and, pointing to this as support for their study, claimed that the Toumai skull belonged to man&amp;#8217;s alleged oldest ancestor.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-08-05</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The ""Lucy"s Relative"" Myth</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147789</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report on the msnbc.com news portal web site dated 5 March, 2005, dealt with an extinct species of ape. This report is a standard propaganda text prepared to sustain the theory of evolution, a great falsehood persisted in despite countless scientific findings working against it.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-10-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Further Support For The Thesis Of Microcephaly In Flores Man</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147788</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A response was issued by us when Homo floresiensis, to give it its scientific name, or Hobbit, as it was widely referred to in the media, fossils were first discovered (1). In that response we explained how the classification of Homo floresiensis as a separate species was based solely on evolutionist preconceptions, and that there were no concrete scientific criteria on which everyone agreed. The groundless nature of this &amp;#8220;separate species&amp;#8221; claim subsequently came to the surface, and we reported how experts from various countries of the world had, in their published reports, added their weight to the ideas that a small brain volume was insufficient grounds for Homo floresiensis to be classified as a separate species, and that the approximately 400 cc volume skull concerned could have been the result of the disease known as microcephaly, which leads to a non-fully developed brain.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-01-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Perfect Creation The Skeleton And The Secret Character Of Evolutionists</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147787</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The skeleton provides support for the human movement system by means of perfect harmony and cooperation between exceedingly detailed anatomical structures. It does this to perfection because it has an equally flexible and strong structure. The skeleton consists of some 200 bones equipped with joints at points that make it possible for the body to move in many directions in the most efficient manner. These joints have their own considerable complexity. There are lubricant fluids in the knees, for example, that not only prevent friction but also protect against bacterial attack. The skeleton, based on many balances such as these, reveals the magnificent creation of Almighty God in all regards.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-01-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A new intermediate-form fairy tale on the BBC</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147786</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report published on the BBC website on 27 March, 2006, announced the discovery of a fossilized skull in Ethiopia. Under the heading, &amp;#8220;Ethiopia,&amp;#8221; the report described how the skull had been discovered in two pieces and dated back between 500,000 and 250,000 years. Sileshi Semaw, director of the excavation project and also a research scientist at the Stone Age Institute at Indiana University in the USA, claimed that the fossil they had unearthed appeared "to be intermediate between the earlier Homo erectus and the later Homo sapiens."]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-03-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionist"s Fictitious Film</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147785</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report titled &amp;#8220;A short film of evolution&amp;#8221; carried in the 13 April, 2006, edition of the Turkish daily Radikal announced the discovery of a fossil in Ethiopia. The fossil, first reported in the British scientific journal Nature (Tim D. White et.al, 2006. Asa Issie, Aramis and the origin of Australopithecus. Nature 440:883-889), belonged to Australopithecus anamensis, which is known from previous specimens, and was suggested as constituting a link between two other species in the imaginary human family tree (Ardipithecus ramidus and Australopithecus afarensis). Tim White, a palaeoanthropologist at the University of California, Berkeley, claimed that this fossil, together with certain others previously discovered in the region, constituted &amp;#8220;a mini home video of evolution&amp;#8221; and that some of the links in an imaginary chain extending from an ape-like ancestor to man had been proven.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-04-13</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Towards An End To The Flores Man Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147784</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On 23 May, 2006, the Ntvmsnbc.com news portal carried a report headed &amp;#8220;Debate over the truth of the Hobbit.&amp;#8221; The report contained the latest study regarding Homo floresiensis, nicknamed the &amp;#8220;hobbit&amp;#8221; (*) by the media, and some views concerning it.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-05-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionsts ""Masks Lifted"" The fact that reconstructions do not reflect the truth has once again been proven</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147783</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 2 June, 2006, edition of New Scientist magazine carried an article by Deborah MacKenzie titled "Putting a face to a skull." The article discussed the unreliability of skull-based reconstructions. Based on an investigation by German police, the article once again revealed the scientific invalidity of the "reconstructions" -that represent a significant part of evolutionist propaganda concerning the fictitious human evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-06-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>An 80 - Million - Year - Old Orchid Has Demolished The Fictitious Evolutionary Progression</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147782</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Darwinists expected that proof of the evolution that never happened will eventually come to light, but have now suffered a terrible disappointment. The fossil records not only provide specimens of living fossils but also proof that has done away with the imaginary evolutionary family tree.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-08-30</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The ""factor that makes human beings human"" error published in the Turkish daily Radikal</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147781</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Turkish daily Radikal published a report headed &amp;#8220;What is it that makes human beings human?&amp;#8221; in its 3 October, 2006 edition. This short article, which summarized examples of the genetic and molecular differences between human beings and apes revealed over the last few years, maintained that evolution was a process influenced by environmental factors and not dependent upon specific rules, and that the question &amp;#8220;what is it that makes human beings human&amp;#8221; would soon be answered.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-10-03</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>CNN.com&#8217;s Army Ant Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147780</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report published on CNN.com on May 7, 2003, has revealed a major contradiction. (i) Called &amp;#8216;An Army as Old as the Dinosaurs,&amp;#8217; the article reported the results of genetic analyses performed on army ants by the Cornell University entomologist Sean Brady. Based on these conclusions, CNN.com claimed that army ants, demonstrated to have undergone no change for 100 million years, had evolved from the same source.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Trapping Komodo Dragons for Conservation</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147779</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This was a documentary describing Komodo Dragon and the environment of this interesting reptile. But along with all the facts there were some interesting words directed to the subconscious of the viewers: &amp;#8220;About 30 million years ago the Komodo Dragon evolved from a different branch in Asia.&amp;#8221;]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Return to the Wild: The Adopted Kangaroo</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147778</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[There was in interesting claim in a documentary dealing with the animals of Australia. Why can&amp;#8217;t kangaroos protect themselves from being killed on the highways by large transport vehicles? The preferred answer to this question has been provided, with difficulty, by the theory of evolution. Again, with no proof, a totally imaginary scenario has been devised and presented as a scientific fact. According to this explanation, Kangaroos has not had enough time to develop a defense mechanism against large vehicles. That is, the kangaroos&amp;#8217; problem is lack of time.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Myth Of The Evolution Of The Horse On National Geographic TV</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147777</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The documentary &amp;#8216;The Horses Empire,&amp;#8217; broadcast on National Geographic TV on August 20, brought the evolutionist claims regarding the origins of the horse to our screens. However, these claims regarding the origin of the horse rested on a number of imaginary fossils, the invalidity of which had been demonstrated years before.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-20</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Natural History&#8217;s Spider Fantasy</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147776</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The September 2003 edition of Natural History carried an article titled &amp;#8220;Love and Death,&amp;#8221; which dealt with a study by the evolutionary biologists Matthias W. Foellmer and Daphne J. Fairbaim. (&amp;#8220;Spontaneous Male Death During Copulation in an Orb-veawing Spider&amp;#8221;, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B (Suppl.) DOI 10. 108/rsbl.2003.0042, 2003)]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-09-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Life Of Birds</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147775</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In this documentary, which described various species of bird, two evolutionary myths were put forward. In the first it was claimed that birds had developed a broad spectrum of technical tools and means. This claim is based on using the word "developed" instead of "possess" in reference to the existing structures in living things, a tactic which is frequently employed in order to impose the theory of evolution on society without offering the slightest scientific evidence for it.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-02-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic TV, February 2, 2004 ; ""The Irish Elk""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147774</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This programme was about the large, extinct species known as the Irish Elk, and engaged in speculation as to the factors which might have led to its disappearance. However, right from the outset that speculation was all made in the context of an evolutionary perspective. It was claimed, without proposing any evidence, that the species had come into being by means of evolution. The account in the programme demonstrated a blind devotion to Darwinism. In that part of the documentary dealing with the Irish elk"s giant antlers and body, it was said that the animal had obviously developed a bodily structure capable of supporting those enormous antlers, and that evolution had created a specialised animal that needed wide open pastures in order to grow exceptionally large antlers.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-02-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Myth of Snake Evolution on NTVMSNBC.COM</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147773</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report dated 9 April 2004 on the NTVMSNBC.COM news portal, titled &amp;#8220;The evolution of snakes began on land,&amp;#8221; dealt with a genetic analysis performed by Blair Hedges, a Penn State biology professor, and the postdoctoral fellow Nicolas Vidal. In their research, to be published in the 7 May 2004 edition of the journal Biology Letters, Vidal and Hedges compared the DNAs of 17 families of snake with lizard DNAs and determined that from the point of view of genetic similarity snakes were closer to land-based lizards than to marine ones. Based on this, the researchers claimed that snakes evolved not in the ocean, but on the land.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-05-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The BBC"s Evolution Of Shrinkings Spines Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147772</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The April 15, 2004 edition of BBC Online carried a report headed "Genome reveals limb number recipe." The report, prepared by BBC science writer Paul Rincon included a study (1) published in Nature magazine concerning the genetic mechanism responsible for the pelvic spines of sticklebacks, which the fish are believed to use for defence against predators. Although those which live in salt water have spines, there are also examples of spineless ones in fresh water.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-04-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Tale Of ""The History Of Evolution Of Mammals"" On The BBC Turkish Site</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147771</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A genome study dated December 1, 2004, was carried on the BBC?s Turkish website. The report, that began with evolutionary indoctrination under the title ?DNA lens on the history of evolution,? described how American scientists had studied the genome structures of certain present-day mammals. Taking the data obtained from this research as its starting point, it contained claims regarding the kind of creature the imaginary evolutionary ancestor of mammals might have been. The study, carried out by geneticists at the University of California?s Santa Cruz campus, investigated the genome structures of the following species: the pig, horse, cat, dog, bat, mouse, rabbit, gorilla, chimpanzee, and human beings.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-12-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolution: A Fossil In The Minds</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147770</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report dated March 7, 2005, was published on the dailytimes website. The story, titled "110m-year-old sea turtle fossils found," concerned fossil discoveries made by Australian scientists. Paleontologist Ben Kear announced that they had found the fossils of 10 sea turtles dating back around 110 million years, together with a 40 million-year old crocodile fossil. The striking discovery with regard to the sea turtle fossils was that despite being more than 100 million years old they were identical to present-day specimens. The crocodile fossils belonged to a crocodile family that is now extinct. (Like sea turtles, modern-day crocodiles are "living fossils" and no different to specimens from 80 million years ago.)]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-03-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The New Scientist Error Regarding the Ancestor of Mammals</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147769</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article titled ?Ancient genes rise from the dead? was carried in the 4 December, 2004, edition of New Scientist magazine. The article described a study performed by geneticists from the University of California?s Santa Cruz campus, in which the pig, horse, cat, dog, bat, mouse, rabbit, gorilla, chimpanzee and human genome structures were investigated.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-12-04</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Myth Of Feline Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147768</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On 6 January, 2006, the BBC website published a report titled ?New cat family tree revealed.? The report concerned a genetic analysis regarding the origin of cats conducted by a team led by Warren Johnson of the National Cancer Institute in Frederick, Maryland, USA. The scientists in question interpreted their findings in the light of blindly held evolutionist assumptions and came up with a story regarding the so-called evolution of today?s cats]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-01-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The False Tale Of Mammal Development That GEO Seeks To Spread Between The Lines</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147767</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Turkish version of the magazine Geo carried a report titled ?The Earliest Rabbit? in its February 2006 edition. The report announced the discovery of a fossil in Mongolia by a team led by Robert Asher at the Berlin Museum of Natural History. The fossil, given the name Gomphos elkema, belonged to an early species of rabbit and was estimated to be around 55 million years old. The rabbit fossil in question exhibited various differences compared with today?s rabbits. It had smaller ears, for instance, and sharp molars like those of squirrels. Like modern rabbits, however, it had long foot that was nearly the size of its entire arm.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-02-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>An Heavy Blow To The Mammalian Evolution Scenario</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147766</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The mammalian evolution scenario has been dealt a severe blow by a recent fossil finding. It is reported in the February 24, 2006, issue of the daily New York Times under the heading ?Beaver or Otter, It lived in Dinosaurs? Time.?]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-02-24</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>New Species Discovered in a Cave and the BBC"s Evolution Deception</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147765</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[These creatures are crustaceans, and include a blind species resembling the scorpion. The Israeli biologist Dr. Hanan Dimantman commented, "the eight species that were found are only the beginning."]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-06-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Error of ""Evolutionary Change in Galapagos Finches""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147764</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[New Scientist magazine carried an article headed ?Evolution in action by Darwin?s finches? in its 22 July, 2006, issue. The article concerned various observations made during the drought that affected the Galapagos Islands in 2003 and 2004 by the researchers Peter and Rosemary Grant, known for their studies of the island?s finches. The drought-related reduction in the seeds that represent the finches? food resulted in changes in the size of the beaks of the finch species Geospiza fortis and Geospiza magnirostris.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-07-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Why Is Hurriyet Bilim Astonished By An Example Of ""Lack Of Evolution""?</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147763</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its August 2, 2003, edition, Hurriyet Bilim, the weekly supplement to the Turkish daily Hurriyet, carried a report titled ?Fruit Flies Refute Evolution.? The sub-caption to the article read, ?Scientists have made an astonishing discovery and, contrary to the theory of evolution, have observed that a fruit fly is unable to adapt to increasing conditions of drought.?]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Error of Islamic Evolutionism</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147762</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its October 2-8 edition, the Turkish magazine Tempo published an article titled ?Islam Accepts Darwin? as its cover story. That same article was also published in daily Hurriyet and on various Internet sites. Sabah columnist Emre Akoz cited the file as a reference in an article called ?Islam Makes Peace with Darwin,? dated October 2.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-10-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>National Geographic"s Darwin Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147761</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The November edition of National Geographic magazine (NG) posed the question "Was Darwin Wrong?" on its front cover. Natural scientist David Quammen, author of the article by the same name, replied "No" to that question from his own perspective, and claimed that Darwin"s theory of evolution was today backed up by powerful scientific evidence. Quammen repeated the main claims from Darwin"s book The Origin of Species, but overlooked one important detail.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-11-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Scientific World Is Turning To God</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147760</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The newspapers these days are echoing with these regret-filled words by Antony Flew, in his time a well-known atheist philosopher. The 81-year-old British professor of philosophy Flew chose to become an atheist at the age of 15, and first made a name for himself in the academic field with a paper published in 1950.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The ""Intelligent Design"" Distraction</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147759</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In the United States in the second half of the 1980s, a theory known as "intelligent design" was launched against the theory of evolution, maintaining that all living things came into being not by chance--as Darwinism maintains--but as the result of an "intelligent design."]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Discovery Channel And Propaganda Films Based On Out Of Date Evolutionist Suppositions</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147758</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Recently the Discovery channel went on air with a new ape-man propaganda documentary called "Hunt or Be Hunted" in which, once more, actors dressed up as so-called hominids featured. Scenes depicting prey flesh being carved up by blood stained hands holding primitive stone knifes, flesh being carried to a cave, cooked on fire and then being eaten by ape-men, making strange sounds coming from the throat, followed one another.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>CNN.com"s Meaningless Support for Darwinist Fantasies</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147757</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On September 25, 2003, cnn.com carried a report headed ?Dog DNA reveals man"s link with best friend? The report dealt with a study on the DNA of a male poodle performed by Ewen F. Kirkness and his team. Cnn.com interpreted the results of the research from an evolutionist perspective, writing that man is closer to the dog than to the mouse.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-10-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Dogmatic Backing for Micro-Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147756</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its 15 January 2004 edition Nature magazine carried an article titled ?Evolutionary biology: Our relative genetics.? Written by David Penny, an evolutionary biologist working at New Zealand?s Massey University, the article asks whether or not micro-evolutionary genetic changes can account for the origin of man. Penny considers this question with interpretations based on data from the still uncompleted chimpanzee genome project.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-01-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>An Ideological Award For  Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147755</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On 23 December, 2005, the BBC carried a report on its web site titled ?Evolution Takes Science Honors.? The report announced that the well-known scientific magazine Science, published in the USA, had given its 2005 science award to evolution. The article said that certain studies into the alleged workings of evolution had been described as the most important scientific development in 2005, and it was claimed in comments by a number of evolutionist scientists that evolution constituted the basis of modern biology.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionary Distortions From CBT</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147754</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Turkish magazine Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik (Cumhuriyet Science and Technology) carried a report titled ?The 10 Most Important Scientific Events? in its 7 January, 2006, edition. The article listed the advances described as the most important scientific developments of the year by the American magazine Science. The CBT sub-caption read ?Important findings have been obtained regarding the way that populations diverge in order to establish new species,? and the section regarding the theory of evolution appeared under the heading ?Evolutionary mechanism discovered.?]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-01-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Nonsense About ""Evolution Teaching Man"" On Ntvmsnbc.com</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147753</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Evolutionary propaganda is an attempt to disseminate an unscientific and irrational belief under a scientific guise and using various misleading means. One of these deceptive methods employed by evolutionists  is personification, or ascribing human attributes to non-human entities.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-02-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>There is a better question for New Scientist to ask!</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147752</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On 11 March 2006, the New Scientist magazine website carried an article titled ?Are we still evolving?? The article, written by Kate Douglas, contained speculation regarding whether or not the evolutionary process, which evolutionist researchers have adopted as a dogma, is still continuing. After quoting Steven Pinker from Harvard University as saying, ?In the biological sense of changes in the gene pool, it"s impossible to say,? Douglas referred to work by Bruce Lahn, considering this as a finding suggesting that supposed evolution is still taking place.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-03-11</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Futuyma"s Bosphorus Errors</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147751</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A conference was recently held at the Bosphorus University (BU) in Istanbul, following another held at the Middle East Technical University (METU), Turkey, to which the State University of New York"s evolutionary biologist Douglas J. Futuyma was invited as a guest of the METU Biology Department teaching staff member Aykut Kence. Futuyma divided his conference address, entitled "Evolution: The Most Important Theory in Biology," into two parts, the first concerning supposed evidence for evolution and the second, a claim that creationism is not scientific. The conference, held at 17:00 hours on 11 May 2006, in the Assembly Hall, was attended by academics including Professor Asl? Tolun, head of the BU Molecular Biology and Genetics Department, and Dr. Aykut Kence, as well as some 100 students. Below, we provide a general critique of Futuyma"s address, followed by individual responses to his misleading comments regarding the theory of evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-05-11</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Five Errors From New Scientist</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147750</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A file by the name of ?Evolution: Five Big Questions? was carried in the June 14, 2003 edition of the British magazine New Scientist. The file consisted of five articles written by five different scientists, all proponents of the theory of evolution: Michael Russell, Andrew Pomiankowski, George Turner, Paul Rainey and Robin Dunbar. In other words, the impression was given that the questions concerned had been fully ?answered.?]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Unfounded Claims from New Scientist Magazine Regarding the Evolution of Multi-Cellular Organisms</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147749</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The July 26, 2003, edition of New Scientist magazine contained a claim concerning the so-called evolutionary origin of multi-cellular organisms. The article, titled "How Animals Learned to Stick Together", discussed the molecular analyses carried out by Wisconsin-Madison University biologist Nicole King. It was maintained in the article that findings obtained as the result of King"s research had resolved a number of problems regarding how animals evolved from single-celled organisms. Below we explain how the research in question does not provide any results in favour of Darwinism but is rather a biased interpretation by the evolutionist magazine New Scientist.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A New Fantasy Concerning the Origin of Life from New Scientist</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147748</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In its 27 September, 2003, edition, New Scientist carried an article called ?Relic Hints at Primal Force.? This article added further speculation to the fantasy that life began with natural phenomena and coincidences.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-09-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Error Concerning Peter Schultz"s Research</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147747</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The January 2004 edition of Discover magazine listed the top 100 scientific studies carried out in 2003. One of these, the 32nd on the list, was an article titled "Creating New Life" (Surely God is beyond that). The article summarised the genetic engineering research on the bacterium Escherichia coli by Peter Schultz, of The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) in California. Schultz succeeded in having the bacterium produce an amino acid outside the 20 amino acids used in the living world. Michael Abrams, who reported the research, wrote that with Schultz"s research the world"s first man-made, genuine artificial organism had been produced.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-01-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Fact About Giardia</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147746</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Recent research into the intestinal parasite Giardia intestinalis has refuted the "missing link" role previously ascribed to the myth of the evolution of this organism"s eukaryotic cell. In contrast to what had previously been supposed, it has been revealed that there are mitochondrial genes and mitochondria-like sacs in Giardia.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-05-11</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Dan Neil"s Error: Reconciling Darwinism With Religion</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147745</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On 27 November, 2005, Los Angeles Times carried an article by Dan Neil. Titled &amp;#8220;In God and Darwin We Trust,&amp;#8221; (God is beyond all this), the article considered the evolution/creation debate in terms of the situation in Chile, and sought to construct common ground between Darwinism and belief in God. Neil maintained that evolution is a scientific theory and that for the religious believers in Patagonia see no reason to oppose Darwinism. However, he ignored a number of very important facts.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-11-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Jerry Adler"s Darwinism Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147744</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The December 12, 2005 issue of Newsweek International magazine carried an article titled ?Evolution of a Scientist.? Written by Jerry Adler, the article concerned an exhibit at the American Museum of Natural History in New York, about Darwin?s life and influence. The exhibit will display Darwin?s personal effects and insect specimens he had collected. Then it will begin an international museum tour that will come to an end in London in 2009, the 150th anniversary of the publication of Darwin?s book, after traveling to such cities as Boston, Chicago and Toronto. The article was full of praise for Darwin?s ideas. Adler rightly explained that the ideas of such figures as Sigmund Freud and Karl Marx, among those who shaped the intellectual history of the last century, were increasingly weakening, but wrongly asserted that Darwin remained as an intellectual challenge.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-12-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Reality Refused To Be Understood By The National Geographic TV</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147743</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The National Geographic TV, on the 7th of May 2003, went on air with the documentary titled ?LOST WORLDS: THE FISH THAT TIME FORGOT.? The subject of the documentary was the Coelacanth, once portrayed as evidence for the theory of evolution that life forms evolved from the sea onto the land. However the Coelacanth, caught alive in 1938 and since then many more times, rocked the evolution theory. Amazingly, the National Geographic TV made no mention of the Coelacanth?s deadly blows to the theory. Instead, it was claimed that the fish proved Darwin right.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Latest ""Transition to the Land"" Tale</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147742</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report of a fossil discovery published in Science magazine has once again revealed the way in which the media constitute a broad and one-sided environment for Darwinism to thrive in. A small bone fragment extracted from the ground was the focus of interest for those who elect to believe the myth that the hundreds of millions of living species that constitute the present biodiversity on Earth all evolved from a common ancestor. Darwinist news agencies such as the BBC, CNN and MSNBC joined forces with Darwinist publications such as Scientific American, National Geographic and New Scientist to portray a bone fragment brought out of the ground in the state of Pennsylvania in the USA as evidence that fish moved to the land by turning into four-legged animals.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-04-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Another Blow To The Icons Of Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147741</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Scientific examination performed on the reconstruction of the Archaeopteryx brain has revealed that the structure of that creature"s brain was no different to that of the brain structure of modern day birds, and that it possessed the necessary structural and neurological equipment to be able to fly. The study in question was carried out by an international team of experts led by the palaeontologist Angela Milner from London"s Natural History Museum and was published by the British scientific journal Nature.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-12-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The BBC"s Latest "" Missing Link"" Propaganda</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147740</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report titled ""Original"" great ape discovered? was carried on the BBC News website on 18 November, 2004. The report concerned the fossil Pierolapithecus catalaunicus, discovered in Spain and announced in the 19 November, 2004, edition of Science magazine, and maintained that the fossil in question was a ""missing link"" the common ancestor of human beings and great apes.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-12-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Four-Winged Bird Myth In The New Scientist</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147739</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 22 May 2004 issue of New Scientist magazine carried a report titled ?Four-winged birds were first to take to the air. The article concerned an investigation into the fossil Archaeopteryx by zoologist Per Christiansen of the University of Copenhagen. Christiansen reported the existence of objects resembling traces of feathers along the fossil?s back, around its legs and possibly on the base of its neck.1 The New Scientist article recalls a parallel claim made by Nick Longrich, a graduate student at the University of Calgary in Canada2, referring to his claim that the Archaeopteryx specimen had flight feathers on its legs.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2004-05-22</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutionary Myths Regarding G. Wucaii</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147738</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report titled ?Oldest T. rex relative unveiled? was carried on the BBC website on 8 February, 2006. The report dealt with a fossil discovery linked to Tyrannosaurus rex, the largest known carnivorous dinosaur. The BBC reported evolutionist scenarios based on the revelation of various similarities between the fossil and T. rex as if they were scientific fact, blindly engaging in Darwinist propaganda claiming that the fossil in question was the earliest ancestor of T. rex. Following lines show why the evolutionist claim in question is no more than a fairy tale and that the BBC?s support for these myths consists of an error based on preconceptions.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-02-08</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animal Planet, ""Champions of the Wild""</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147737</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In that section describing the manatee, a mammal also known as the southern fur seal, a number of evolutionist claims were made about the animal. The first such claim was that elephants and anteaters are among manatees" closest living relatives. This claim of a familial relationship is based solely on prejudice.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A New Dinosaur Fossil And The Error Of Bird Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147736</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[On 15 March, 2006, Cnn.com carried an article titled ?Fossil ruffles feather evolution theory.? According to this report, which first appeared in Nature magazine, a dinosaur fossil discovered in Germany has completely overturned all the theories regarding the evolution of feathers. Inspired by the Jura Mountains in southern Germany, scientists gave the fossil the name of Juravenator starki. The most important feature of the fossil was that it demonstrated that the ?feathered dinosaur? claim is a complete myth, because the fossil in question represents a ?featherless? dinosaur that was living at the time as the imaginary ?feathered dinosaurs? that evolutionists constantly propagandize.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-03-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Evolutions Errors Regarding Bambiraptor Feinbergi</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147735</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Bambiraptor feinbergi is a fossil theropod (small, meat-eating dinosaur) species discovered in the U.S. state of Montana, in 1994. It consists of a skeleton that is 95% complete and is dated to some 75 million years ago. It is presented as evidence by evolutionists for &amp;#8220;birds are dinosaurs&amp;#8221; theory- which has been the subject of widespread media propaganda despite being devoid of scientific evidence.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Evolutionist Claim Of A Transition From Water To Land Is A Lie; Tiktaalik Roseae: Another Missing Link Myth</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147734</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[<p>
	Darwinist media organizations have embarked upon a new wave of propaganda aimed at portraying a fossil recently described in the journal Nature i,ii,iii as a missing link. The fossil in question is that of a fish, discovered in Arctic Canada by the paleontologists Neil H. Shubin and Edward B. Daeschler in 2004. Given the scientific name Tiktaalik roseae, the fossil is estimated to be 385 million years old. Evolutionists looking for possible candidates for their tales of a transition from water to land are putting the fossil forward as an intermediate form by distorting its ?mosaic? features.</p>
]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-01-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Support For The Supposed Evidence Of Fictitious Evolution From Vatan Newspaper</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147733</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Turkish newspaper Vatan carried a report titled ?The Fossil That Has Confused the World,? taken from the 7 April 2006 issue of the journal Nature. The article claimed that a fossil discovered in Arctic Canada was ?the missing link in the chain of life from water to land.?]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-04-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Panicking evolutionists have added another to their list of tall tales: ""The Four-Legged Dolphin"" myth...</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147732</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Evolutionists? despair and state of panic in the face of living fossil exhibitions continues unabated. The latest indication of this came with an evolutionist distortion announced under the headline ?Four-legged dolphin found? in the pages of the Turkish daily Bugün on 6 November, 2006.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-11-06</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A New Ape-Man Claim and Old Errors in Turkish Daily Milliyet</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147729</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The 23 September, 2006, edition of the Turkish daily Milliyet reported that a fossil finding discovered in Ethiopia belonged to an approximately 3-year-old member of Australopithecus afarensis under the headline &amp;#8220;A giant discovery in evolution.&amp;#8221; The 3.3-million-year-old fossil was nicknamed Selam by scientists. Selam was referred to in the article as &amp;#8220;the first hominid,&amp;#8221; and propaganda was made to the effect that human beings emerged by descent from ape-like creatures. It was also claimed that the lower part of the baby&amp;#8217;s body resembled a human being while the upper part resembled an ape, in an attempt to reinforce the fictitious &amp;#8220;half-man, half-ape&amp;#8221; image assumed by the theory of evolution. However, the claims made in the daily consisted of a repetition of a familiar evolutionist error, and the new fossil constituted no scientific support for scenarios of human evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-09-23</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Gogonasus Is Not A Missing Link, But A Fish Exhibiting A Flawless Creation</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147726</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The Turkish daily Hürriyet carried a report titled "380-million-year missing link found" in its 20 October, 2006, edition. The article dealt with the fossil fish known as Gogonasus discovered in Australia by the palaeontologist John Long. Gogonasus had bony structures on its fins and a deep hole in its skull that enabled it to breathe. Based on this anatomy, Long claimed that Gogonasus represented a missing link in the scenario of the transition from water to dry land.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-10-20</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>A Fossil Discovery Showing That Pandas Have Remained Unchanged For Millions Of Years</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147443</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Fossils unearthed from a cave in the south of China have revealed that the panda is also a "living fossil." To put it another way, the fossil record shows that these creatures have remained as pandas since their first appearance millions of years ago.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-06-26</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>10 Notorius Darwinist Fabrications</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147172</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[1. THE LIE THAT "IT HAS BEEN PROVED THAT LIFE COULD HAVE EMERGED BY CHANCE ON THE PRIMITIVE EARTH" 
The only evidence cited in evolutionist sources is the 1953 Miller Experiment.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>0000-00-00</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The World"s Most Ridiculous Claim Of Evolution</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=147139</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The theory of evolution is an illogical and inconsistent hypothesis. The illogicality of the theory lies in its suggesting that the world of living things that contains countless interconnected biological systems emerged as the result of completely blind coincidences.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-07-14</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The BBC"s Dreams Of A Transition From Water To Land</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146972</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report carried on the BBC"s website on 12 April, 2006, considered a new species of fish discovered by Belgian scientists and described in Nature magazine. The report, titled "African fish leaps for land bugs" described how the fish, given the scientific name of Channallabes apus, had the ability to hunt insects along the shore of the swamps in which it lives.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-04-12</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>What a 30 Million-Year-Old Amber Reveals</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146852</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[Researchers from the University of Manchester and Manchester Metropolitan University in Britain conducted a scientific comparison of numerous pieces of amber dating back some 30 million years and containing 671 species of spider.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2008-11-01</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Ultimate Guide: Tyrannosaurus rex</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146763</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The documentary on Discovery Channel dealt with various discoveries made about the Tyrannosaurus Rex dinosaur with a discussion about whether anatomically they were herbivores or carnivores. The claims put forward by evolutionists about the origins of this giant animal are complete fantasy. This is what they claim about the origins of T. Rex:]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-04-12</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Whole Story: Eagle</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146762</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This program shows us some scenes from the life of an eagle and at the very end, there are some evolutionist claims about the origin of birds. It says that birds evolved from dinosaurs. Dinosaurs that leaped on their prey from the branches of trees grew wings in the course of time and became able to fly. The Archaeopteryx that lived 110 million years ago is supposed to be one of these first flying dinosaurs]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-05-13</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animals A to Z: Salamanders</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146761</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In this program, varieties of salamander are described, some living on land, some in water. Animal Planet claims that millions of years ago salamanders living on land opted to emerge from the water. It is claimed that the embryos of land-dwelling red-backed salamanders do not show a hydrophilous stage and that this demonstrates an important point in evolutionary history (the so-called transition from water to land).]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-06-11</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>When Dinosaurs Ruled China</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146760</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[The subject of this program was the fossils of synosauropteryx and caudipteryx, which when first discovered, were presented as evidence for the evolution of birds from dinosaurs. As will be remembered, the feather-like structures found on these fossils excited evolutionists but when analyzed, it was revealed that they were not. Even though the program referred to this situation, it nevertheless attempted to create the impression that birds evolved.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-15</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Animals A-Z: Beetles</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146759</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[We commented on this program before. You can read it on]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-07-25</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Life in the Freezer</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146758</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In the closing part of this documentary about life at the Poles evolutionist claims regarding the origin of birds were aired, and it was maintained that there was "absolutely no doubt" concerning the alleged evolutionary link between birds and reptiles.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Natural Comparisons: Dead Ringer</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146757</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[In this program Animal Planet devoted space to exceedingly deceptive statements frequently employed among evolutionists in popular accounts. These accounts lacking any scientific value can be regarded as being no more than fairy tales.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2003-08-02</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Dinosaur Planet: Little Das Hunt</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146756</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[This documentary dealt with various dinosaur fossil fields in the North American continent, particularly the state of Montana. Fossils of various dinosaur species such as Tyrannosaurus rex and computer animations were shown and imaginary evolutionary relationships among them were constructed.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2005-02-27</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The Death Throes Of Molecular Evolution Scenarios</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146718</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[An article in the 7 April 2006, edition of Science magazine has recently inspired the publication of numerous reports in the media. It is striking that these reports claim that molecular evolution has been proven. However, when examined, the article that inspired these reports consists of an evolutionist scenario concerning the emergence of a hormone-receptor relationship.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-04-07</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>Another Fairy Tale From Turkish Daily Radikal</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146716</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A bird fossil discovered by palaeontologists in the Chinese province of Gansus was introduced in the 16 June, 2006, edition of the American scientific magazine Science. (1) The discovery was made by a team led by Hai-Lou You from the Geology Institute in Beijing, Jerry Harris from Dixie State College in the US state of Utah and Matt Lamanna from the Carniege Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh, also in the USA. On 16 June the Turkish daily Radikal announced the discovery in question under the headline "Another missing link for evolution." However, the discovery in question actually provides no supporting evidence for the theory of evolution at all, and Radikal is merely resorting once again to those evolutionary fairy tales with which we are so familiar.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-06-16</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>The BBC"s Neanderthail Error</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146715</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report published on the BBC website on 16 May, 2006, titled "Neanderthal yields nuclear DNA," dealt with analyses of nuclear DNA obtained from a Neanderthal fossil by a team led by the geneticist Svante Paabo. However, in that section where the analyses in question were interpreted, Neanderthals were referred to as a separate species from modern man, Homo sapiens. It was suggested that Neanderthals separated as a distinct evolutionary line some 390,000 years ago.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2006-05-16</pubDate>
						</item>  <item>
						  <title>MSNBC.com Tall Tales Regarding Bipedalism</title>
						  <link>http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index.php?git=makale&amp;makale_id=146709</link>
						  <description><![CDATA[A report carried on the msnbc.com web site on 16 July, 2007, and headed "Chimps on treadmill offer human evolution insight" made dogmatic claims regarding the supposed evolution of bipedalism. The results of a study published by US researchers and revealing the superior nature, in terms of efficiency, of the way that human beings walk on two legs, were distorted in such a way as to give the impression that they actually supported evolution.]]></description>
						  <author>Darwinism-Watch.com</author>
						  <pubDate>2007-06-16</pubDate>
						</item>  </channel>
			</rss>