Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

149 / 2008-07-19
A report carried on the İhlas.net web site on 19 July, 2008, titled “The 100-kilo Tusks of the Mastodon, the Forebear of the Elephant,” discussed the findings from palaeontological excavations in the Kemer district of the Turkish province of Burdur.
A team of 12 students from the Department of Social Sciences Education, led by Asst. Prof. Nurfettin Kahraman from Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, uncovered mastodon fossils dating back between 6 and 10 million years, as well as Hipparion and deer fossils. However, the www.ihlas.net report, which included evolutionist hypotheses in a manner totally devoid of the proper objectivity required, suggested that the mastodon is the ancestor of the elephant, and Hipparion the forerunner of the horse.

This error on the part of İhlas.net represents yet another instance of the Darwinist deception that has been going on for the last two hundred years. The moment that Darwinists realise that the fossil remains they discover belong to perfect and fully formed entities and that this clearly and irrefutably proves the fact of creation, they seek to adapt their findings to evolution by means of semantics. The fact is that the findings in question constitute no evidence that either the horse or the elephant emerged by way of evolution. Researchers who have already signed up to the theory of evolution consider a supposed line of descent based solely on similarities between life forms and produce totally imaginary evolutionary links between totally independent species. The fact is that these scenarios bear no relation to the fossil record. The theory of evolution has not a single intermediate fossil specimen to confirm the claim that life forms are descended from one another. The fact that fossils refute evolution represents the century’s most serious blow to the theory of evolution.

One authority to clearly express the absence from the fossil record of any transitional form fossil that might act as proof of evolution is Colin Patterson, chief palaeontologist at the Natural History Museum in London. In an interview, Patterson said that the fossil series people spoke of as if they reality existed were in fact totally absent from the fossil record. He then went on to say: “If you ask ‘What is the evidence for continuity?’ you would have to say, ‘There isn’t any in the fossils of animal and man. The connection between them is in the mind’.”[1]

The lack of intermediate forms is one of the most striking results revealed by palaeontology over the last century. David B. Kitts from the Oklahoma University Department of Geology and Geophysics, admits the absence of the transitional forms required by the theory of evolution as follows:
Evolution requires intermediate forms between species, and paleontology does not provide them.[2]

We hope that in reporting such fossil discoveries in the future the İhlas.net news agency web site management will remember that there is no scientific basis to the evolutionist scenarios. By doing so they will avoid being used as pawns in the indoctrination of the public with unscientific Darwinism in the form of materialist accounts of creation. (You can read an earlier refutation of ours, containing definitive proofs, of the idea that Hipparion is the forerunner of the horse, HERE.)



[1]Sunderland, Ref. 7, p. 90. - http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v15/i3/missinglink.asp
[2]David B. Kitts (School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma), "Paleontology and Evolutionary Theory," Evolution, Vol. 28, September 1974, sf. 467



The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.