Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

102 / 2003-09-10

This program on Animal Planet concentrated on various species living on Kangaroo Island, located in south Australia. In one part of the documentary the relationship between one particular species of flower and two species of bee was examined. Although the local bee species managed to collect pollen from the flower, the wild bee was unable to. Animal Planet sought to bring an evolutionist perspective to bear on this, claiming that the plants had evolved together with the local bees.

It is clear, however, that the evolutionary claim being made here contributes nothing to the theory of evolution, which depends on natural processes in its account of the origin of species. The behaviour being linked to evolution consists of the relationship between a plant and a species of bee. Here, neither the plant leads to the emergence of a new species of bee nor the bee leads to the emergence of a new species of plant. The reason why a species of bee collects pollen from a flower which is compatible with its own body and why a wild species of bee cannot is simple, and it is certainly not "evolution."

In fact, it is evident that the attempt being made here to supply an explanation based on evolution is invalid. We can demonstrate this with an analogy. A family which moves to a country where seaweed is consumed in salads may not eat such foods because of its nutritional habits, but this does not show that the seaweed evolved together with the local population.

As we have seen, Animal Planet"s claims offer no support to the theory of evolution, but merely reflect its attempts to adapt its preconceptions in all arenas to the theory of evolution.


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.