Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

106 / 2003-04-13

This documentary presents a series of unscientific and impossible scenarios one after another as if they actually happened. The film was made up of pictures of imaginary evolutionary periods from 400 million years ago to the present that were more fantastic than the tales of the Arabian Nights, and these pictures were presented to viewers as if they were scientific facts.

First of all, the title “400 million years ago” appeared on the screen with the following commentary, “a relatively short time ago evolution started from the seas and came onto the land.” But there was not the slightest explanation of how a fish could possibly have developed by chance events the physiological and organic systems required for life on the land. In comments such as “in order to live on the land animals felt the need to find ways to retain water in their bodies,” there was an obvious and unscientific attempt to attribute intention to evolution. Cine-5 obviously had no knowledge of the claims of the theory of evolution and did not even feel the need to review the claims of evolutionists with regard to Darwinist propaganda; it imagined changes in its own mind and passed over them lightly with illogical explanations such as “the fish wanted it and it happened.” But, no matter how much an organism may want something new or feel the need for a new organ, random mutations will not be of any avail.
Cine-5 continued its tale of evolution as follows:

“350 million years ago, giant insects developed water-resistant skins which permitted them to spread over the planet. 290 million years ago, many animals learned to live without a lot of water. Their hard skins prevented loss of water. 140 million years ago, reptiles evolved into birds. They had eggs designed to be water-resistant. This allowed them to live in some hostile areas of the planet. Mammals evolved in a way that they were able to retain water in their bodies. Some of them even adapted to living in the desert.”

It can be seen that there is not the least scientific explanation or proof in all this extensive narration presented by Cine-5 in its intended support evolutionist propaganda. How is it that the scales of reptiles could turn only into the feathers peculiar to birds? How is it that the full heavy bones or reptiles could turn into hollow birds’ bones light enough for flying? More importantly, how did the wing and its supporting muscles evolve? And how is it that at a certain point in this imagined process of evolution, half wings did not atrophy although they must have made reptiles on the way to being birds very clumsy. How is it that these animals, being at a disadvantage compared to other reptiles, did not disappear, being eliminated in their struggle for life?

Cine-5 gives no answer to these questions; it simply passes over them by making fantastic claims such as, “reptiles evolved into birds” or mammals evolved in a way that their bodies could retain water.” Actually, evolutionists have never been able to explain the origin of mammals and there is an issue that strikes a major blow to their theory. For example, the well-known evolutionist Roger Lewin summarized the quandary that evolutionists find themselves in when he writes, "The transition to the first mammal, ...is still an enigma." (Roger Lewin, “Bones of Mammals, Ancestors Fleshed Out”, Science, vol. 212, June 26, 1981, p. 1492) But, instead of relying on scientific findings in its attempt to get the masses to accept the theory of evolution, Cine-5 chose the fantasy of the frog that turned into a prince and so made discussion of the dilemma impossible.


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.