Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

116 / 2003-06-21

A documentary concerning the phylum Annelidae stressed that in general the worms which emerged during the Cambrian period possessed the same body plans as a great many living things in the world today. However, it was also claimed, on the basis of evolution, that worms are the evolutionary ancestors of many creatures. Nothing positive emerged in the portrayal of evidence of these claims, however.

The subject was glossed over with a rather superficial comparison. An attempt was made to construct a similarity between the structure of a worm which had left traces in a fossil and the skeleton of the elephant. Making use of computer simulations, the curvature of the body axis of the worm was placed over that of the elephant"s backbone, and it was maintained that a great many organs absent from the worm, such as the trunk, legs, joints etc. were built on this so-called evolutionary plan. A living thing like a worm, just 3-5 cm long, and an elephant weighing tons, with a totally different structure to the worm, were portrayed as members of an alleged evolutionary chain, "because the horizontal axes of their bodies displayed the same curvature."

This claim, the fruit of lofty imagination, reveals once again the great obstacle that Darwinism pose to reason and science. Blindly believing in this imaginary transition, which has been clearly demonstrated to be scientifically impossible, and what is more to attempt to have everyone else believe in it, is an attitude that is truly hard to fathom. Attempts to build support for evolution with imaginary computer simulations once again highlights the crisis of proof facing evolutionists.

In fact, both the worms discussed in the program and the phylum Chordata, of which elephants are a part, emerged in the same geological period, in other words in the Cambrian. To attempt to portray these phyla, which emerged at the same time and with no common ancestor as evolutionary relatives means putting evidence that works against evolution forward as proof of that same evolution. It is fallacious, in other words. Erroneous interpretations of this kind are not only an indication of how program producers have conditioned themselves to disseminate Darwinism, but also require us to warn PBS Channel, to review its policy on documentaries.

As has been made clear above, it is a serious mistake for the "Shape of Life" documentaries, prepared as a popular propaganda vehicle with the aim of disseminating Darwinism rather than broadcasting any scientific truth, to be shown on PBS Channel. Careful examination reveals that this documentary series screened by the official radio and television corporation is a repeat of episodes previously broadcast a few months ago. We at that time drew attention in our articles to the scientific errors contained in these programs and to the likely destructive effects of their Darwinist propaganda. We once again take the opportunity offered by these documentaries to appeal to the PBS Channel management to subject their programs to a serious scientific examination.


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.