Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

102 / 2003-07-29

In this program Animal Planet gave a rather negative indication of its level of understanding of the question of the origin of life. This documentary about snakes contained the following statements about a snake which feeds on chicks in bird nests out in open ground:

Eight chicks are enough for it (the snake). It needs to be large to consume a large number of chicks. Large chicks are better. It is for this reason that snakes have evolved to such giant dimensions.

In these lines the reason why some species of snake are large is given as their consuming a great deal. This account is put forward in such a way as to leave no room for doubt, and expressions implying absolute certainty, such as "It is for this reason that..." are employed.

In fact however, although this expression is an indication of absolute certainty, there is no "certainty" at all in Animal Planet’s evolutionary claim. Indeed, far from being "certain," Animal Planet’s claim is totally unscientific. That is because the program refers to snakes evolving and growing the more they eat.


Growth through enormous consumption is a trait acquired during life, and such traits cannot be handed on to later generations. This has been known to science for around a hundred years. In order for a trait to be handed on to subsequent generations it needs to be based upon mutations in the sexual cells. The number of chicks eaten by a snake plays no role in these mutations. To claim that a small snake could assume the dimensions of a python by eating chicks is therefore, to put it in a word, nonsense. (For further details on this venerable error, known as the Lamarckian model of evolution, see The Evolution Deceit, by Harun Yahya.)


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.