Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

33 / 2004-07-07

On 7 July 2004, the Nature magazine website carried a report titled “Immune systems evolved more than once.” The article, written by Laura Nelson, described how it had been discovered that the fish-like creatures called lampreys possessed a different immune system to that of mammals. Judging from the lamprey metabolism, which rejects skin grafts, scientists had previously calculated that these creatures possessed an immune system, but there was no hint that they made antibodies.

In studies they conducted on lampreys, Chris Amemiya, from the Benaroya Research Institute in Seattle, USA, and his team revealed that these animals do produce antibodies, but that the genes producing these are completely different to their equivalents in mammals.

In her article analysing this finding, Nelson claimed that the immune system in animals had evolved more than once, and that lampreys had evolved their own immune system. However, readers were offered no explanation in support of such claims, not a shred of scientific evidence was revealed, and the reader was merely expected to blindly believe what he or she read, in the same way that the author did. In short, it was all a complete fairy tale.

In fact, the immune system is a most complex one, and Darwinism is utterly unable to account for its origins. Indeed, the biochemist Michael Behe, who conducted a detailed scan of the relevant scientific literature on the subject, writes in his book Darwin’s Black Box:

The scientific literature has no answers to the question of the origin of the immune system. ... a gradualistic account of the immune system is blocked by multiple interwoven requirements. As scientists we yearn to understand how this magnificent mechanism came to be, but the complexity of the system dooms all Darwinian explanations to frustration. 1

Nature magazine acts from a totally dogmatic perspective with regard to the alleged evolutionary origin of immune systems. As Behe’s words clearly show, there is absolutely no possibility that the random mutations on which the theory of evolution relies could produce such a system. A brief recollection of some of the features of the immune system in the human body will make this clearer.

A human being’s immune system is a system coordinated by fighting cells such as phagocytes (engulfing cells), macrophages (cleaning cells), lymphocytes (B and T cells) in a truly astonishing manner, and of a complexity that even the most advanced technology comes nowhere near approaching. Thanks to this system, the human body, surrounded by countless microscopic foes, is on guard against enemies at every moment. It is always prepared for attacks, thanks to its specially produced weapons targeted against every type of foe. The way that cells, devoid of any consciousness, carry out such complex arrangement-based coordination shows that this system was created by an Almighty and Omniscient Creator. There can be no doubt but that it is Almighty God Who created the immune system, together with all the other systems in nature. (For miracles of the immune system that refute evolution, see, THE MIRACLE OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM.)

We invite the editors of Nature to accept the fact that modern science points to intelligent design with regard to the immune system, and that the system was created by God.


1.Michael J. Behe, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, New York: Touchstone Books, 1998, pp. 138-139


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.