Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

70 / 2004-08-14

An article titled “Two new views on monogamy” appeared in the 14 August, 2004, edition of the Turkish magazine Hurriyet Bilim. The article dealt with an interview conducted with Dr. Robert Martin, an anthropologist from the Field Museum of Natural History, at Chicago. Two evolutionist claims of Martin’s set out in the article, and our response to them are briefly set out below.

1. Martin claims that Neanderthals are a separate species

Neanderthals are representatives of a human race that lived in Europe, Asia and the Middle East between 200,000 and 30,000 years ago, and which is now extinct. In the early 1900s, evolutionists distorted various Neanderthal anatomical features in order to prove the scenario of humans being descended from ape-like creatures, and tried to present them as “primitive” hominids. Martin now reveals that he subscribes to this viewpoint and claims that Neanderthals are a separate species to modern-day human beings. However, this claim of Martin’s does not reflect even the views of a significant majority of evolutionists. That is because new findings obtained from archaeological excavations have revealed that the Neanderthals does not represent a separate species from human beings, and that in fact, from the anatomical and cultural points of view, Neanderthals lacked nothing found in present-day man. For further information on this subject, see:

2. Martin is mistaken in claiming that the Toumai skull belongs to a missing link

In response to a question posed during the interview, Martin states that a 7-million-year-old skull (the Toumai skull) was recently discovered in Chad and that this may represent a missing link. Here there is a striking inconsistency on Martin’s part. The fossil to which he refers does not support the myth of the missing link and, quite the contrary, demonstrates its invalidity for all to see, to such an extent in fact that in the face of this picture even evolutionist authorities have issued statements admitting that the Toumai skull puts paid to the idea of the missing link. The paleontologist Henry Gee, for instance, says the following in an article concerning this fossil published in The Guardian:

Whatever the outcome, the skull shows, once and for all, that the old idea of a “missing link” is bunk... It should now be quite plain that the very idea of the missing link, always shaky, is now completely untenable. (Henry Gee, “Face of Yesterday,” The Guardian, July 11, 2002)

It is clear that a fossil, which totally undermines the missing link claim, cannot be portrayed as backing up this claim. If it is, then the claim in question must be mistaken. Hurriyet Bilim magazine must not put a premium on erroneous claims merely because they are in favor of Darwinism. We call on the magazine management to abandon its blind support for Darwinism.

Paleoanthropological findings offer absolutely no support for the scenario of human evolution; on the contrary, they totally invalidate it. Fossil discoveries in recent years have revealed that evolutionists’ so-called family tree consists of an unscientific supposition based totally on prejudice and imagination. For more information see:


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.