Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

113 / 2004-10-07

The 7 October, 2004, edition of the International Herald Tribune carried an article titled “Evolution, as told by the louse.” The article dealt with a study, performed by David Reed of the Florida Museum of Natural History, on the DNA sequences of head and body lice. Reed analyzed the DNA differences between the two clusters of lice. In the light of the results he obtained he claimed that these two split apart from an alleged joint ancestor some 1.18 million years ago.

Reed, acting in the light of evolutionist preconceptions, was transmitting a scenario he has brought to life in his own mind and assumed that only a single type of louse was present in the imaginary joint ancestor of human beings and chimps, since it had full body hair. Again in the light of preconceptions, he also assumed that two types of lice evolved as a result of human beings allegedly shedding their body hair during the process of evolution.

As can clearly be seen, this way of thinking is based entirely upon the adoption of evolution as a dogma. Assumptions made on the basis of this are founded on other assumptions that are taken as being true. It is clear that such an approach is an unscientific mode of thinking that reveals a one-sided perspective. Comments made in this light constitute no scientific evidence for the theory of evolution. What we are looking at is not concrete findings that support the theory of evolution, but facts interpreted in a biased manner according to the theory, but that which really constitute no evidence for it at all.

A similar study on lice had been performed previously, and we responded in detail to those claims at the time. If you wish to examine the one-sided aspect of evolutionist assumptions regarding the DNA sequences of lice, you can read our article here.


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.