Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

30 / 2003-10-25

On September 25, 2003, cnn.com carried a report headed “Dog DNA reveals man"s link with best friend” The report dealt with a study on the DNA of a male poodle performed by Ewen F. Kirkness and his team. Cnn.com interpreted the results of the research from an evolutionist perspective, writing that man is closer to the dog than to the mouse. It carried the following comments from Craig Venter, of the human genome project, regarding the research:

We are much closer to the dog than to the mouse in terms of our gene content ... but if you do the evolutionary tree we are on the same linage as the mouse. The mouse is evolving at a much faster rate.

This claim by Venter rests on no evidence at all and merely reflects his own prejudices. What is being done here is to set out the differences in the nucleotide strings in the genes of these living things and to calculate them according to the molecular clock, which evolutionists regard as a measuring device. However, all these calculations constitute no evidence whatsoever for the theory of evolution, and merely reflect the fantasies of Darwinists, who have adopted evolution as a dogma.

In fact, there is not a single fossil record to show that these living things, or indeed any other mammal, evolved from a common ancestor. Furthermore, the molecular clock analyses in question are flawed from a number of points of view. You can read one of our papers on Darwinists’ errors regarding molecular clock analyses and the vicious circle they reveal within them HERE.

Our advice to cnn.com, which fails even to mention the use of the imagination and prejudice underlying Venter’s claims as it reports on them, is to abandon its support for evolutionary fairy tales and to accept that the origin of life is intelligent design.


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.