Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

Haeckel"s Embryo Drawings Are Fraudulent
In his 1868 book Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte (The History of Natural Creation) Ernst Haeckel suggested that he had made various comparisons using human, monkey and dog embryos. The drawings he produced consisted of nearly identical embryos. On the basis of these drawings, Haeckel then suggested that the life forms involved had common origins.
The Idea That the “Coelacanth is an Example of the Transition from Sea to Land” Is a Fraud
These words from a Darwinist, in the April 2003 issue of Focus magazine, describe the astonishment at the discovery of a living Coelacanth (Latimeria chalumnae), for years portrayed as a transitional form, in today’s waters. Prior to 1938, Darwinists had made countless claims about the fossil Coelacanth, interpreting its fins as “legs about to start walking” and a fossilized oil sac as “a primitive lung.” With all this speculation about the fossil, they suggested that they had discovered a missing link.
Darwin’s Legacy confirmed on the 200th Anniversary
In 1859, 150 years ago, Darwin said the following in his book the Origin of Species: WHY, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see Innumerable trans?t?onal forms? Why is not all nature In confusIon instead of the species being, as we see them, well defIned? Innumerable transItIonal forms must have exsted, why do we not fInd them embedded In countless numbers In the crust of the earth? Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links?
A New Evolutionist Irrelevance: Speculation on a 385-Million-Year-Old Spider Fossil
The latest speculation regarding a 385-million-year-old fossil depicted in newspaper headlines as the world’s oldest spider fossil once again demonstrates evolutionist irrelevance. The report in question appeared on the BBC News web site on 23 December 2008, under the headline “Tangled web of spider evolution;” it also appeared in Turkey in such publishing organs as the CNN Türk web site (23 December 2008) and the daily newspaper Star (24 December 2008). The report maintained that a spider living 385 million years ago was unable to spin webs in the same way as spiders living today, and that spiders acquired that ability through imaginary evolution.
A New Dino-Bird Lie and Darwinists’ Pointless Wriggling
An article in the 19 October, 2008, issue of Nature announced to the scientific world that a new “dino-bird” had been discovered. It maintained that this creature, described under the headline “A bizarre Jurassic maniraptoran from China with elongate ribbon-like feathers” had “primitive feathers” and represented an example of the imaginary transition from dinosaurs to birds.
All That Is Left of Specious Intermediate Fossils: Another Tiktaalik Roseae Myth
Evolutionists seek to give the public the impression that fossils support evolution. Yet despite 1.5 centuries of excavations, not a single fossil to back up these efforts has ever been found. For that reason, Darwinists have sought a solution in inventing intermediate forms.
The Daily Telegraph’s Distortions Regarding Gerobatrachus
The 21 May, 2008, internet issue of the Daily Telegraph carried a report titled “Missing link fossil settles frog evolution debate.”
A Myth Regarding The Origin Of Hands And Feet On ntvmsnbc.com
A report published by the news portal ntvmsnbc.com on Friday, 26 October, 2007, added yet another component to unscientific Darwinist propaganda.
Darwinists Are in Despair: Another Feathered Dinosaur Scenario
Towards the middle of June, another report about evolution and a new fake fossil originating from the Associated Press was excitedly carried in such media organs as Nature, Science Daily, Discovery News, Cosmos, Yahoo News, Guardian Online, BBC News, and Scientific American. The way that a fossil that actually refuted the theory of evolution in many ways was depicted as evidence in favour of evolution was truly astonishing.
Darwinists Refuse to Abandon Their Speculation about T. rex
An article titled "If T. Rex fell, how did it get up, given its tiny arms and low center of gravity?" carried on the Scientific American web site on 9 May, 2007, considered Tyrannosaurus rex, which Darwinists have for a long time insisted on regarding as an intermediate form. This fossil, which has been the subject of evolutionist conjecture because of various of its anatomical features, has been insistently proposed by Darwinists as evidence for the fictitious transition from reptiles to birds. However, hundreds of pieces of evidence refuting this claim have come to light, despite which attempts are still made to use T. rex for Darwinist propaganda.
1 2 3 4 5


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.