Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

The Error Concerning Peter Schultz"s Research
The January 2004 edition of Discover magazine listed the top 100 scientific studies carried out in 2003. One of these, the 32nd on the list, was an article titled "Creating New Life" (Surely God is beyond that). The article summarised the genetic engineering research on the bacterium Escherichia coli by Peter Schultz, of The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) in California. Schultz succeeded in having the bacterium produce an amino acid outside the 20 amino acids used in the living world. Michael Abrams, who reported the research, wrote that with Schultz"s research the world"s first man-made, genuine artificial organism had been produced.
A New Fantasy Concerning the Origin of Life from New Scientist
In its 27 September, 2003, edition, New Scientist carried an article called ?Relic Hints at Primal Force.? This article added further speculation to the fantasy that life began with natural phenomena and coincidences.
Unfounded Claims from New Scientist Magazine Regarding the Evolution of Multi-Cellular Organisms
The July 26, 2003, edition of New Scientist magazine contained a claim concerning the so-called evolutionary origin of multi-cellular organisms. The article, titled "How Animals Learned to Stick Together", discussed the molecular analyses carried out by Wisconsin-Madison University biologist Nicole King. It was maintained in the article that findings obtained as the result of King"s research had resolved a number of problems regarding how animals evolved from single-celled organisms. Below we explain how the research in question does not provide any results in favour of Darwinism but is rather a biased interpretation by the evolutionist magazine New Scientist.
Phantom of the Deep
The porcupine fish is a species that can at once inflate to double its size by sucking in water. It scares away the enemy and prevents being swallowed. Animal Planet asks the following question in one of the scenes showing this fish and gives the following answer: ... Or how did a fish learn to inflate to twice its body size when it encounters danger? Definitely one of nature"s most successful experiments.
Five Errors From New Scientist
A file by the name of ?Evolution: Five Big Questions? was carried in the June 14, 2003 edition of the British magazine New Scientist. The file consisted of five articles written by five different scientists, all proponents of the theory of evolution: Michael Russell, Andrew Pomiankowski, George Turner, Paul Rainey and Robin Dunbar. In other words, the impression was given that the questions concerned had been fully ?answered.?
New Scientist’s Multicellular"s Evolution Dreams
In the Ediacara region of South Australia referred to, a larIn its April 12 2003 issue, the magazine New Scientist published an article headlined: “Ice Magic.” In the article, one of the matters which is amongst the greatest problems of the theory of evolution is considered and speculation is set forth about the so-called evolutionary origins of multicellular organisms.
Evolutionary Tell Tales From BBC -1-
The documentary The Human Body, taken from the BBC and broadcast by NTV, was full of intense propaganda intended to impose the theory of evolution on viewers. Yet this propaganda served no other purpose than to prove that the theory of evolution is nothing but an unscientific myth.
The Cambrien Deadlock Of Evolutinists Is Getting Broader
In its February 1999 issue, the prominent science magazine TIG dealt with the issue of Cambrian period, one of the greatest deadlocks of evolution.
1 2


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.