Turkish




Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation



The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
 


Prof. Robert Davis, from Glasgow University, warned that the Scottish curriculum is “under pressure” of atheists like Richard Dawkins
Prof. Ro
Response To The Darwinist Deceptions In The News Site Malaysian Insider
Response
There Is No Such Thing as the “First Self-reproducing Molecule That Gave Rise to Life”
There Is
Perfection Is an Outcome Shown by Science and Prevails in All Living Structures
Perfecti
Channels That Only Show Animals’ Savage Aspects Are Engaging in Darwinist Propaganda
Channels
Protein Synthesis is Impossible to Explain Through Evolutionary Mechanisms

As evolutionists also well know, it is impossible that even a single protein, which is the smallest building block of life, could come into existence on its own by coincidence. Even the tiniest protein molecule has a superior creation, a striking mechanism and characteristics. It is impossible that inanimate atoms could organize and form this perfect structure through coincidence.

The Question Razing The Theory Of Evolution To The Ground: How Did Inanimate Molecules Come To Life?

The theory of evolution has collapsed in the first place, in the face of the question, “How did life begin?” Evolutionists, who tell pages of stories and create countless speculations about fossils and origins of species, cannot produce an imaginary scenarios to answer the question “How did life begin?” and fall into a deep silence: This is because it is not possible to explain how even a single protein molecule came into existence by itself through blind coincidences. There is no answer to explain how inanimate molecules came to life and turned into living organisms.

Their desperation is expressed in an article written by Brian Switek, dated February 13th, 2012, on the online version of the Nature magazine, which is one of the sources evolutionists most rely on, as such:

Interpreting science through the eyes of faith
Say: ‘He is God, Absolute Oneness, (Surat al-Ikhlas, 1) God, the Everlasting Sustainer of all. (Surat al-Ikhlas, 2) He has not given birth and was not born. (Surat al-Ikhlas, 3) And no one is comparable to Him.’ (Surat al-Ikhlas, 4)

The Qur’an is a great miracle applicable to all centuries. It fully describes the essence of many problems that exist today and sets out the truth of those problems in the finest manner. Mankind came under the influence of various erroneous philosophies in the last two centuries, which inflicted great sufferings on people. These verses from Surat al-Ikhlas are excellent guides for mankind.

This wondrous universe we inhabit, our Earth with its many lovely plants, fruits and animals and every detail in living things awake the greatest amazement in people, without exception. We are astonished by these as believers, and that amazement is of course for God, Who creates them all. Unbelievers may also be amazed by nature, the universe, plants and animals; but dialectical materialism and the theory of evolution and its application to nature, blunts that appreciation in those people. They therefore seek to portray all these wondrous phenomena as the work of a simple conflict of opposites and chance.

A Response To The Error Concerning The Southern California Stick Insect Published On The Science Daily Web Site

A statement that appeared on the Science Daily web site on May 16, based on an article in Science magazine dated May 15, claimed that a stick insect in Southern California had evolved in a parallel manner through natural selection into two separate species.

The article described how the stick insect known as Timema cristinae resembles thin twigs and has a camouflaged back. It then went on to say that there are two different variations, one with a white stripe on its back, and one that lacks such a stripe. One stick insect feeds on the needle-like leaves of the Adenostoma bush and is camouflaged thanks to the white stripe on its back; the other type feeds on the broad green leaves of the plant Ceonathus and has no stripe on its back.

Manufacturing a molecule in a laboratory environment is not evidence for evolution

The 29 October issue of the magazine Nature carried an article titled ‘Scientists Make Enzyme That Could Explain the Origin of Life on Earth.’ Scientists manufactured a molecule they named a ‘ribozyme’ under test tube conditions and claimed that this constituted evidence for evolution. First and foremost, this Darwinist claim is nothing new, and we have responded to claims concerning ‘evolution in test tube’ on previous occasions (For example, http://www.harunyahya.org/tr/works/3773/Darwinistlerin-Bilmek-Istemedikleri-Gercekler/chapter/4247/Cumhuriyet-Bilim-Teknik-genlerle-ilgili-deneyleri-saptiriyor?view=desktop?view=desktop)

Contrary to what the article maintains, this experiment did not involve a molecule emerging from nothing and by chance. The test tube contained already existing RNA, and a change was brought about in that. Various inconsistencies in the article and frequently reiterated questions such as ‘How is it that the first RNA came into being and how did the enzyme come to function in this way?’ are significant in showing that the result of the experiment does not constitute evidence for evolution.

The Darwinist Fear of 'Living Fossils'

One thing is common to all the evolutionist articles and news reports; statements with no scientific grounding, futile but relentless efforts to hide the truths…

Mr. Adnan Oktar's Response to Mr. Franz Magnis-Suseno

Mr. Adnan Oktar responded Franz Magnis-Suseno's claims published on Jakarta Post in response to his article published in the same media a week before 

 http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/11/07/the-papacy-s-great-responsibility.html

The Express Tribune’s error concerning ‘cow-whale’ evolution

The International New York Times-affiliated daily The Express Tribune, published in Pakistan, published an article on November 8, 2014, titled, “Evolution 101: Genetic evidence says cows and whales are related, says doctor.” This article in response discusses the logical inconsistencies of some of the claims and unscientific interpretations in that article.

Whales live in the sea and are the largest mammals on earth. Their metabolisms and reproductive, respiratory, sight, hearing and circulatory systems are unique to them and totally different to those of all other sea dwellers. These differences have always represented an important problem for evolutionists, meaning they have been unable to postulate family ties between whales and other marine creatures.

240-Million-Year-Old Pollen Fossil Discovered

During excavation studies in the north of Switzerland, in Weiach and Leuggern conducted by researchers of the Zurich University Institute and Museum of Paleontology, fossilized pollen grains belonging to flowering plants have been discovered. Dating back 240 million years, these pollen grains prove that flowering plants, with all their flawless characteristics, existed millions of years ago.

Sulfur bacteria that have remained unchanged for 2.3 billion years are evidence of the fact of Creation

Recently, a report published simultaneously in world-famous scientific magazines and dailies such as the Washington Post described how sulfur bacteria living in the depths of the ocean have come down unchanged to the present day.

A 500,000-year-old Modern Work of Art Shows the Intelligence of People of the Time

A freshwater clamshell estimated to date back some 500,000 years was discovered recently. What made this shell interesting were the handiwork on it and the detail involved that astonished Darwinists. The markings, which immediately appeared to be the work of an intelligent and cultured human being, once again rebutted the fallacy of ‘primitive man’ of the theory of evolution.

The captions based on Darwinist prejudices that appeared in publications such as New Scientist and Science and web sites such as Smithsonian.com do not, therefore, reflect the truth.

Why are www.theguardian.com and other Darwinists mistaken?

Recently, there have been reports in some media covering the discovery of a 170-million-year old fossil. What was notable about the story was not the remains dating back millions of years, but that the fossil was alleged to belong to a  reptile-fish species, known as the ichthyosaur, and that the species was said to be a half-way life form between reptiles and fish.

This piece provides scientific evidence exposing the invalidity of these claims and documents how this life form, with its own unique physical features, cannot be such a transitional form.

The Darwinist idea that ‘Humans are no different to animal species’ is incorrect

A recent article published in Popular Science magazine titled ‘Should animals have the same rights as people?’ was based on the idea that humans should not regard themselves as different to other animals. The aim behind this idea, which many people may find harmless at first sight, emerged later on in the piece.

The article was intended to support the idea of the theory of evolution; that man and animals are descended from a common ancestor.

A 80 million year old rare frilled shark fossil found in Australia speaks against Darwinism

Recently, reports appeared in the press stating that a prehistoric shark had been caught in Australia.

The Myth of Evolution Again from the Top: “Let life start without protein, but not without sugar”

Although Darwinists are no longer as vocal as they once were, they still continue to test the waters from time to time. Indeed, a new chapter was recently added to the long list of Darwinist errors. That was the claim that ‘chain reactions inside the cell can occur in the absence of enzymes.’ 

In this article we shall reveal that the idea in question has nothing to do with being scientific and that, on the contrary, it was an interesting but amateurishly designed deception that even someone with an insufficient knowledge of basic biology could immediately realize.

The Evolutionist Scenario over “Homo naledi” Has Come to Nothing

Numerous reports, claiming that a fossil known as Homo naledi represents an ancestor of man, have been appearing in the media in recent weeks. The reconstruction pictures and stories written were all intended to give the impression that this represented a semi-human, semi-ape entity. But what is the real truth of this fossil described as a hominid, and do those claims have any scientific foundation?

In this article we shall be looking at how Darwinists use ape bones as a propagand

What Does the Fact That We Share the Same Diseases with Neanderthals Mean?

In its February 12, 2016, issue, Science magazine published the results of a new study conducted at Vanderbilt University, USA. Although at first sight the article appeared to be about inherited diseases, the title, “The phenotypic legacy of admixture between modern humans and Neanderthals,” showed that it contained evolutionist propaganda.

The Ancestors of Armadillos Were also Armadillos

Evolutionary theorists declare certain species "ancestors" and certain species "descendants" despite the fact that they have no scientific evidence regarding any transition between species. Merely shaped by the imagination of evolutionists and not based on any scientific data, such scenarios are kept on the agenda until a more striking one is devised. Today, those used for this purpose are usually the news agencies; by reporting such news, a respected news agency -knowingly or unknowingly- becomes an instrument of spreading evolutionist scenarios among other news. Through this strategy, even fictitious news reports begin to gain validity. However, any information received by a news agency should be carefully analyzed by the editors, its authenticity should be investigated in the first place, regardless of its source, and its scientific value should be questioned.

There has been such an example in Turkey:

PLoS ONE Journal Fails to Stand Against the Power of Atheist Propaganda and Darwinist Dictatorship

Although every branch of science acknowledges that there is a single Creator Who creates everything, be it living or non-living, from nothing, some still deny the existence of God. There has been an exemplary case of this in the recent past.

A study in PLoS ONE, a US-based scientific journal, was retracted shortly after it had been approved and published by the PLoS ONE editors. The reason for the retraction was the conclusion of the study that the “hand is the proper design by the Creator” and is “Creator’s invention.”

A new attempt for a fake transitional form by the Journal Nature: Tyrannosaur Euotica

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12



THE ATLAS OF CREATION RAZED DARWINISM IN EUROPE

The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>


In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.