Türkçe


Evolutionary Propaganda in Daily Papers

Evolutionary Propaganda in Scientific Magazines

Evolutionary TV broadcasts

Evolutionary Propaganda on the Internet

Common Darwinist Claims

Evolutionary Propaganda in Other Magazines



Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Presentations on the fact of creation



The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
 


Prof. Robert Davis, from Glasgow University, warned that the Scottish curriculum is “under pressure” of atheists like Richard Dawkins
Prof. Ro
Response To The Darwinist Deceptions In The News Site Malaysian Insider
Response
There Is No Such Thing as the “First Self-reproducing Molecule That Gave Rise to Life”
There Is
Perfection Is an Outcome Shown by Science and Prevails in All Living Structures
Perfecti
Channels That Only Show Animals’ Savage Aspects Are Engaging in Darwinist Propaganda
Channels
Protein Synthesis is Impossible to Explain Through Evolutionary Mechanisms

As evolutionists also well know, it is impossible that even a single protein, which is the smallest building block of life, could come into existence on its own by coincidence. Even the tiniest protein molecule has a superior creation, a striking mechanism and characteristics. It is impossible that inanimate atoms could organize and form this perfect structure through coincidence.

The Question Razing The Theory Of Evolution To The Ground: How Did Inanimate Molecules Come To Life?

The theory of evolution has collapsed in the first place, in the face of the question, “How did life begin?” Evolutionists, who tell pages of stories and create countless speculations about fossils and origins of species, cannot produce an imaginary scenarios to answer the question “How did life begin?” and fall into a deep silence: This is because it is not possible to explain how even a single protein molecule came into existence by itself through blind coincidences. There is no answer to explain how inanimate molecules came to life and turned into living organisms.

Their desperation is expressed in an article written by Brian Switek, dated February 13th, 2012, on the online version of the Nature magazine, which is one of the sources evolutionists most rely on, as such:

Interpreting science through the eyes of faith
Say: ‘He is God, Absolute Oneness, (Surat al-Ikhlas, 1) God, the Everlasting Sustainer of all. (Surat al-Ikhlas, 2) He has not given birth and was not born. (Surat al-Ikhlas, 3) And no one is comparable to Him.’ (Surat al-Ikhlas, 4)

The Qur’an is a great miracle applicable to all centuries. It fully describes the essence of many problems that exist today and sets out the truth of those problems in the finest manner. Mankind came under the influence of various erroneous philosophies in the last two centuries, which inflicted great sufferings on people. These verses from Surat al-Ikhlas are excellent guides for mankind.

This wondrous universe we inhabit, our Earth with its many lovely plants, fruits and animals and every detail in living things awake the greatest amazement in people, without exception. We are astonished by these as believers, and that amazement is of course for God, Who creates them all. Unbelievers may also be amazed by nature, the universe, plants and animals; but dialectical materialism and the theory of evolution and its application to nature, blunts that appreciation in those people. They therefore seek to portray all these wondrous phenomena as the work of a simple conflict of opposites and chance.

A Response To The Error Concerning The Southern California Stick Insect Published On The Science Daily Web Site

A statement that appeared on the Science Daily web site on May 16, based on an article in Science magazine dated May 15, claimed that a stick insect in Southern California had evolved in a parallel manner through natural selection into two separate species.

The article described how the stick insect known as Timema cristinae resembles thin twigs and has a camouflaged back. It then went on to say that there are two different variations, one with a white stripe on its back, and one that lacks such a stripe. One stick insect feeds on the needle-like leaves of the Adenostoma bush and is camouflaged thanks to the white stripe on its back; the other type feeds on the broad green leaves of the plant Ceonathus and has no stripe on its back.

Manufacturing a molecule in a laboratory environment is not evidence for evolution

The 29 October issue of the magazine Nature carried an article titled ‘Scientists Make Enzyme That Could Explain the Origin of Life on Earth.’ Scientists manufactured a molecule they named a ‘ribozyme’ under test tube conditions and claimed that this constituted evidence for evolution. First and foremost, this Darwinist claim is nothing new, and we have responded to claims concerning ‘evolution in test tube’ on previous occasions (For example, http://www.harunyahya.org/tr/works/3773/Darwinistlerin-Bilmek-Istemedikleri-Gercekler/chapter/4247/Cumhuriyet-Bilim-Teknik-genlerle-ilgili-deneyleri-saptiriyor?view=desktop?view=desktop)

Contrary to what the article maintains, this experiment did not involve a molecule emerging from nothing and by chance. The test tube contained already existing RNA, and a change was brought about in that. Various inconsistencies in the article and frequently reiterated questions such as ‘How is it that the first RNA came into being and how did the enzyme come to function in this way?’ are significant in showing that the result of the experiment does not constitute evidence for evolution.

The Darwinist Fear of 'Living Fossils'

One thing is common to all the evolutionist articles and news reports; statements with no scientific grounding, futile but relentless efforts to hide the truths…

Mr. Adnan Oktar's Response to Mr. Franz Magnis-Suseno

Mr. Adnan Oktar responded Franz Magnis-Suseno's claims published on Jakarta Post in response to his article published in the same media a week before 

 http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/11/07/the-papacy-s-great-responsibility.html

The Express Tribune’s error concerning ‘cow-whale’ evolution

The International New York Times-affiliated daily The Express Tribune, published in Pakistan, published an article on November 8, 2014, titled, “Evolution 101: Genetic evidence says cows and whales are related, says doctor.” This article in response discusses the logical inconsistencies of some of the claims and unscientific interpretations in that article.

Whales live in the sea and are the largest mammals on earth. Their metabolisms and reproductive, respiratory, sight, hearing and circulatory systems are unique to them and totally different to those of all other sea dwellers. These differences have always represented an important problem for evolutionists, meaning they have been unable to postulate family ties between whales and other marine creatures.

240-Million-Year-Old Pollen Fossil Discovered

During excavation studies in the north of Switzerland, in Weiach and Leuggern conducted by researchers of the Zurich University Institute and Museum of Paleontology, fossilized pollen grains belonging to flowering plants have been discovered. Dating back 240 million years, these pollen grains prove that flowering plants, with all their flawless characteristics, existed millions of years ago.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


The Lie of Human Evolution

Darwinist Propaganda, Darwinist Demagoguery

The Dilemma of Transitional Forms

The Origin of Living Things

Dead End for Molecular Evolution

Creation of the Universe

Lies of Atheism, Materialism and the Philosophy of Evolution

The Deception of Animal Evolution

The Deception of Plant Evolution

Darwinist Fairy Tales on Life

Articles on Darwinist Deception

The Deficient Basis of The Darwinist Propaganda

How the Dajjal died


THE ATLAS OF CREATION RAZED DARWINISM IN EUROPE

The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>


In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.