Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

Prof. Robert Davis, from Glasgow University, warned that the Scottish curriculum is “under pressure” of atheists like Richard Dawkins
Prof. Ro
Response To The Darwinist Deceptions In The News Site Malaysian Insider
There Is No Such Thing as the “First Self-reproducing Molecule That Gave Rise to Life”
There Is
Perfection Is an Outcome Shown by Science and Prevails in All Living Structures
Channels That Only Show Animals’ Savage Aspects Are Engaging in Darwinist Propaganda
Protein Synthesis is Impossible to Explain Through Evolutionary Mechanisms

As evolutionists also well know, it is impossible that even a single protein, which is the smallest building block of life, could come into existence on its own by coincidence. Even the tiniest protein molecule has a superior creation, a striking mechanism and characteristics. It is impossible that inanimate atoms could organize and form this perfect structure through coincidence.

The Question Razing The Theory Of Evolution To The Ground: How Did Inanimate Molecules Come To Life?

The theory of evolution has collapsed in the first place, in the face of the question, “How did life begin?” Evolutionists, who tell pages of stories and create countless speculations about fossils and origins of species, cannot produce an imaginary scenarios to answer the question “How did life begin?” and fall into a deep silence: This is because it is not possible to explain how even a single protein molecule came into existence by itself through blind coincidences. There is no answer to explain how inanimate molecules came to life and turned into living organisms.

Their desperation is expressed in an article written by Brian Switek, dated February 13th, 2012, on the online version of the Nature magazine, which is one of the sources evolutionists most rely on, as such:

Interpreting science through the eyes of faith
Say: ‘He is God, Absolute Oneness, (Surat al-Ikhlas, 1) God, the Everlasting Sustainer of all. (Surat al-Ikhlas, 2) He has not given birth and was not born. (Surat al-Ikhlas, 3) And no one is comparable to Him.’ (Surat al-Ikhlas, 4)

The Qur’an is a great miracle applicable to all centuries. It fully describes the essence of many problems that exist today and sets out the truth of those problems in the finest manner. Mankind came under the influence of various erroneous philosophies in the last two centuries, which inflicted great sufferings on people. These verses from Surat al-Ikhlas are excellent guides for mankind.

This wondrous universe we inhabit, our Earth with its many lovely plants, fruits and animals and every detail in living things awake the greatest amazement in people, without exception. We are astonished by these as believers, and that amazement is of course for God, Who creates them all. Unbelievers may also be amazed by nature, the universe, plants and animals; but dialectical materialism and the theory of evolution and its application to nature, blunts that appreciation in those people. They therefore seek to portray all these wondrous phenomena as the work of a simple conflict of opposites and chance.

A Response To The Error Concerning The Southern California Stick Insect Published On The Science Daily Web Site

A statement that appeared on the Science Daily web site on May 16, based on an article in Science magazine dated May 15, claimed that a stick insect in Southern California had evolved in a parallel manner through natural selection into two separate species.

The article described how the stick insect known as Timema cristinae resembles thin twigs and has a camouflaged back. It then went on to say that there are two different variations, one with a white stripe on its back, and one that lacks such a stripe. One stick insect feeds on the needle-like leaves of the Adenostoma bush and is camouflaged thanks to the white stripe on its back; the other type feeds on the broad green leaves of the plant Ceonathus and has no stripe on its back.

Manufacturing a molecule in a laboratory environment is not evidence for evolution

The 29 October issue of the magazine Nature carried an article titled ‘Scientists Make Enzyme That Could Explain the Origin of Life on Earth.’ Scientists manufactured a molecule they named a ‘ribozyme’ under test tube conditions and claimed that this constituted evidence for evolution. First and foremost, this Darwinist claim is nothing new, and we have responded to claims concerning ‘evolution in test tube’ on previous occasions (For example, http://www.harunyahya.org/tr/works/3773/Darwinistlerin-Bilmek-Istemedikleri-Gercekler/chapter/4247/Cumhuriyet-Bilim-Teknik-genlerle-ilgili-deneyleri-saptiriyor?view=desktop?view=desktop)

Contrary to what the article maintains, this experiment did not involve a molecule emerging from nothing and by chance. The test tube contained already existing RNA, and a change was brought about in that. Various inconsistencies in the article and frequently reiterated questions such as ‘How is it that the first RNA came into being and how did the enzyme come to function in this way?’ are significant in showing that the result of the experiment does not constitute evidence for evolution.

The Darwinist Fear of 'Living Fossils'

One thing is common to all the evolutionist articles and news reports; statements with no scientific grounding, futile but relentless efforts to hide the truths…

Mr. Adnan Oktar's Response to Mr. Franz Magnis-Suseno

Mr. Adnan Oktar responded Franz Magnis-Suseno's claims published on Jakarta Post in response to his article published in the same media a week before 


The Express Tribune’s error concerning ‘cow-whale’ evolution

The International New York Times-affiliated daily The Express Tribune, published in Pakistan, published an article on November 8, 2014, titled, “Evolution 101: Genetic evidence says cows and whales are related, says doctor.” This article in response discusses the logical inconsistencies of some of the claims and unscientific interpretations in that article.

Whales live in the sea and are the largest mammals on earth. Their metabolisms and reproductive, respiratory, sight, hearing and circulatory systems are unique to them and totally different to those of all other sea dwellers. These differences have always represented an important problem for evolutionists, meaning they have been unable to postulate family ties between whales and other marine creatures.

240-Million-Year-Old Pollen Fossil Discovered

During excavation studies in the north of Switzerland, in Weiach and Leuggern conducted by researchers of the Zurich University Institute and Museum of Paleontology, fossilized pollen grains belonging to flowering plants have been discovered. Dating back 240 million years, these pollen grains prove that flowering plants, with all their flawless characteristics, existed millions of years ago.

Sulfur bacteria that have remained unchanged for 2.3 billion years are evidence of the fact of Creation

Recently, a report published simultaneously in world-famous scientific magazines and dailies such as the Washington Post described how sulfur bacteria living in the depths of the ocean have come down unchanged to the present day.

A 500,000-year-old Modern Work of Art Shows the Intelligence of People of the Time

A freshwater clamshell estimated to date back some 500,000 years was discovered recently. What made this shell interesting were the handiwork on it and the detail involved that astonished Darwinists. The markings, which immediately appeared to be the work of an intelligent and cultured human being, once again rebutted the fallacy of ‘primitive man’ of the theory of evolution.

The captions based on Darwinist prejudices that appeared in publications such as New Scientist and Science and web sites such as Smithsonian.com do not, therefore, reflect the truth.

Why are www.theguardian.com and other Darwinists mistaken?

Recently, there have been reports in some media covering the discovery of a 170-million-year old fossil. What was notable about the story was not the remains dating back millions of years, but that the fossil was alleged to belong to a  reptile-fish species, known as the ichthyosaur, and that the species was said to be a half-way life form between reptiles and fish.

This piece provides scientific evidence exposing the invalidity of these claims and documents how this life form, with its own unique physical features, cannot be such a transitional form.

The Darwinist idea that ‘Humans are no different to animal species’ is incorrect

A recent article published in Popular Science magazine titled ‘Should animals have the same rights as people?’ was based on the idea that humans should not regard themselves as different to other animals. The aim behind this idea, which many people may find harmless at first sight, emerged later on in the piece.

The article was intended to support the idea of the theory of evolution; that man and animals are descended from a common ancestor.

A 80 million year old rare frilled shark fossil found in Australia speaks against Darwinism

Recently, reports appeared in the press stating that a prehistoric shark had been caught in Australia.

The Myth of Evolution Again from the Top: “Let life start without protein, but not without sugar”

Although Darwinists are no longer as vocal as they once were, they still continue to test the waters from time to time. Indeed, a new chapter was recently added to the long list of Darwinist errors. That was the claim that ‘chain reactions inside the cell can occur in the absence of enzymes.’ 

In this article we shall reveal that the idea in question has nothing to do with being scientific and that, on the contrary, it was an interesting but amateurishly designed deception that even someone with an insufficient knowledge of basic biology could immediately realize.

The Evolutionist Scenario over “Homo naledi” Has Come to Nothing

Numerous reports, claiming that a fossil known as Homo naledi represents an ancestor of man, have been appearing in the media in recent weeks. The reconstruction pictures and stories written were all intended to give the impression that this represented a semi-human, semi-ape entity. But what is the real truth of this fossil described as a hominid, and do those claims have any scientific foundation?

In this article we shall be looking at how Darwinists use ape bones as a propagand

What Does the Fact That We Share the Same Diseases with Neanderthals Mean?

In its February 12, 2016, issue, Science magazine published the results of a new study conducted at Vanderbilt University, USA. Although at first sight the article appeared to be about inherited diseases, the title, “The phenotypic legacy of admixture between modern humans and Neanderthals,” showed that it contained evolutionist propaganda.

The Ancestors of Armadillos Were also Armadillos

Evolutionary theorists declare certain species "ancestors" and certain species "descendants" despite the fact that they have no scientific evidence regarding any transition between species. Merely shaped by the imagination of evolutionists and not based on any scientific data, such scenarios are kept on the agenda until a more striking one is devised. Today, those used for this purpose are usually the news agencies; by reporting such news, a respected news agency -knowingly or unknowingly- becomes an instrument of spreading evolutionist scenarios among other news. Through this strategy, even fictitious news reports begin to gain validity. However, any information received by a news agency should be carefully analyzed by the editors, its authenticity should be investigated in the first place, regardless of its source, and its scientific value should be questioned.

There has been such an example in Turkey:

PLoS ONE Journal Fails to Stand Against the Power of Atheist Propaganda and Darwinist Dictatorship

Although every branch of science acknowledges that there is a single Creator Who creates everything, be it living or non-living, from nothing, some still deny the existence of God. There has been an exemplary case of this in the recent past.

A study in PLoS ONE, a US-based scientific journal, was retracted shortly after it had been approved and published by the PLoS ONE editors. The reason for the retraction was the conclusion of the study that the “hand is the proper design by the Creator” and is “Creator’s invention.”

A new attempt for a fake transitional form by the Journal Nature: Tyrannosaur Euotica


Why is the New York Times' claim about the creation of an artificial human genome unreasonable?

A New York Times article published on May 13th 2016, claimed that it is possible to create “a Synthetic Human Genome.” In the article penned by Andrew Pollack, there was another claim that “all the DNA contained in human chromosomes could be manufactured.” We will explain the irrationality and invalidity of such a claim using scientific evidence and prove that DNA cannot be created out of thin air.

Indeed, the drafters of the article must have been aware of that fact as there are some remarkable points in the article published in the New York Times. For instance, George Church, a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School, said  “The project was not aimed at creating people, just cells, and would not be restricted to human genomes.” After all, as it is known by everyone that it is not possible to synthesize the human DNA containing three billion base pairs out of thin air, the project which had initially been called  “HGP2: The Human Genome Synthesis Project”, was then changed to “HGP-Write: Testing Large Synthetic Genomes in Cells.” Despite all of these changes and explanations, the statements placed in the sentences of the article attempt to suggest that “a human being can now be created.” That being said, let us look into the fact that DNA is the product of a supreme creation we have yet to understand and that it is not possible to create a living being out of nothing.

The Admission of “Sudden Emergence of Complex Life” in the journal Nature

The 31 August 2016 issue of the journal Nature broke the news that some bacteria fossils dating back to 3.7 billion years ago were discovered in Greenland. This news was covered by other publications as well. Even though some scientific publications tried to present this finding as evidence of evolution, in truth, they are the continuation of the previously discovered fossils, proving that life on earth emerged suddenly without undergoing any imaginary evolutionary processes.

Beaked Whale Adaptation of the Vestigial Tooth Tale by the Guardian and ABC

In May 15th, 2016, the Guardian newspaper[1] and ABC network[2] reported the news of a rare beaked whale. The news made mention of the unusual teeth structure of these whales and claimed -without providing any scientific proof- that these findings are the supposed remnants of the evolutionary process. According to the news, which also featured the claims of the South Australia Museum personnel, the said whale had supposedly vestigial teeth.

This assertion brings to mind the repeatedly refuted 'vestigial organs' claims proposed by evolutionists. Evolutionists argue that some organs lose their functions over time and thus some creatures possess redundant organs; in other words, organs they do not use. However, today everyone knows very well that the organs declared vestigial by evolutionist are in fact quite vital and complex. Yet the vestigial organ tale, which has been repeatedly retold in many different forms by Darwinists, is still  kept on the agenda as a byproduct of the lack of knowledge and most of all, the aim to deceive the public.

Contrary to expectations of the evolutionists, the RNA world now proves creation

Evolutionists have worked hard for decades to offer a logical evolutionary explanation for the origin of life and unsurprisingly their explanations have failed each and every time. Most recently, their ‘RNA world’ hypothesis failed spectacularly in another major disappointment for its supporters.

In Fact, PNAS Proves Creation With Its RNA World Experiment

Even though scientific evidence proves otherwise, same claims are repeatedly brought up by Darwinists. This is one of the methods used to keep the Darwinist ideology alive. As a matter of fact, scientific developments over the years, even if unintentionally, have forced Darwinist circles to accept the impossibility of the formation of DNA and protein molecules by chance. This kind of formation is not possible without the cell and the required proteins existing at the same time.

BBC News and Darwinism's biggest conundrum: How did life begin?

On October 31, 2016, an article was published in the evolutionist web site BBC News claiming that "we are now closer to finding out the secret for the origin of life." The goal was to be able to give the impression that Darwinism could give a Darwinist explanation to the question on "the origin of life", the greatest conundrum of Darwinism throughout history. Darwinists had attempted a "rescue operation" after this definite defeat.

Even at the beginning of the article it was clearly stated that this text was prepared as an ideological objection to the truth of creation.

Intracellular Molecular Machines That Perform Protein Care and Cleanup

Cells spring to life with the proteins and the functions of the cells actualize through proteins specially made for each task. 

In a typical mammal cell, there are approximately ten to twenty thousand different functioning protein varieties.  For a cell to be healthy, these proteins need to be healthy first. For this reason, the existence of intracellular quality control mechanisms is crucial.  

Response to the "Evolution of Snakes" Claim of Science Magazine

Science magazine published another so-called “evolution report” in its October 2016 issue. The report claimed that the small bones in the tail of the boa snakes' bodies are the remnants of the imaginary legs that these creatures supposedly possessed in the past.

A Response to the "Homosexuality is Genetic" propaganda of the National Geographic

All of the eight major studies conducted on identical twins in the United States, Scandinavia and Australia over the last 20 years have pointed to the same result:  Homosexuals are not born gay.

Identical twins share the same genes and DNA. They were exposed to the same prenatal conditions. Accordingly , if homosexuality depended on genetic causes or prenatal conditions; in the cases where one of the twins was gay, the other would have to be  gay as well.

Tales About The Beginning Of Life On The Discovery Science Tv Channel

The Discover Science TV channel presented space as the source of organic molecules, and featured the assertion that life might have  originated on other planets. In this article, we will focus on the fact that the existence of the chemicals in question does not point to life, and we will lay bare another distortion for the sake of evolution, which is far from explaining the origin of life.

What Does the Discovery of Sugar-like Chemicals in Space Signify?

A Made-up ‘Hominid’ Tale from Science Mag: Denisovans

Nowadays there is a common mobility in some scientific journals and internet sites that are set to work on Darwinism’s advocacy. Some remains of living things that were found in the past years, the insufficiency and invalidity of which were proven, are being brought back to the agenda again to be presented as evidence of evolution.

One of the latest examples of this has been published on sites such as Sciencemag and Dailymail. Stories revealing Darwinist imagination has been made the topic of articles one more time, by bringing a small piece of a finger bone and a few teeth to the fore.

New Scientist and BBC News’ Lies about Birth with Cesarean Section

During the past month, articles appeared in several national and international news outlets, mainly the New Scientist, BBC News and the Independent, claiming that "cesarean section changed the alleged evolutionary process of birth". An article published on October 26, 2016 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science was used as reference to these claims.

Darwinism is a supersititous belief that disparages women

The alleged scientific support that Social Darwinism provided for racism, fascism and imperialism, as well as communism, is a widely known subject that has been much written about. But one lesser known fact is that a great many Darwinists, including Charles Darwin himself, have believed in the fallacy  that women are both biologically and mentally inferior to men.

In Response to Michael Skinner: Epigenome DOES NOT PROVIDE NEW INFORMATION to the DNA

On the website of AEON digital magazine, Darwinist Professor Michael Skinner came forth with a new evolutionary account. In his article dated November 9th, 2016, Skinner suggested that neo-Lamarkism and neo-Darwinism should be combined under “Unified Theory of Evolution” and the alleged effect of epigenetics analyzed from this perspective. Trying to incorporate the obsolete theories from the 1800’s into the science of epigenetics is a futile attempt. Epigenetics is a field that demonstrates the perfection in the functioning of the DNA in a more comprehensive way, and it is such a complex as well as precise mechanism, which no evolutionary claims of “chance” could ever account for.  

In this article, we will elaborate once again on what epigenetics is, and we will show that environmental factors do not add any new genetic information to the organism by presenting scientific proofs.

The 360 Million-Year-Old Acanthostega Fossil Refutes Again the Evolutionary Claims Of Transition to Land

Acanthostega is an aquatic organism with gills. It is estimated to be 360 million years old. As a result of the research conducted by Jenny Clack, a paleontologist at the Cambridge University in 1987, it was suggested that this fossil, having one limb and eight digits, was allegedly a transitional form between fish and tetrapods (four-limbed land vertebrates). Based on this claim and the fossil, evolutionists allege that fish first developed limbs and then made a transition to land, rather than moving over to land and then developing feet. However, this argument is totally inconsistent. First of all, Clack clearly states that she does not know whether Acanthostega was living on land or not, even though she is an evolutionist. It is a grave misconception to claim that an aquatic organism is a transitional form that supposedly came from water to land due to some bone-like tissue in the fin. This mistake of the evolutionists shows that they have quickly forgotten their misconception of the Coelacanth that lived 65 million years ago.

Ribosomal Quality Control

There are several million ribosomes in a single cell. Ribosomes, which are protein production plants, have active roles in all the cells of the body. For example, combining the proteins in the cell to form larger macromolecular structures is among the tasks of the ribosomes. However, not all the functions of ribosomes, which are considered to be the "black box" of molecular biology, have been fully understood yet, and therefore new research has been frequently conducted on the ribosome. The study, the results of which were published in Cell Reports and The EMBO magazines in September 2016, is among these. With this new study, Würzburg University and Max Planck Institute researchers have shown that ribosomes also take on the role of  being "a quality control point" as well as assuming  protein production, which is the already known assignment of ribosomes.

Playing LEGO at the Molecular Level

Darwinist Tales Are Repeated on CNN: Homo Naledi

Science is an important road to truth. But, on the condition that the methods used are impartial and scientific facts are not distorted. However, when comparison is made between various animal and human species in many Darwinist studies and researches, in fact, rough methods are applied rather than scientific facts. For example, a so-called ancestral relationship between species is constructed within the framework of a method called "Topographic anatomy" used by Darwinists based on observational data such as  skull size, bone length and thickness, curve-flat formation of bones, tooth size and placement. In sorting the skulls of monkeys, which they allege to be the so-called common ancestor of man according to their sizes, Darwinists attempt:

Science Magazine and the Tale about Rapid Repeated Evolution of Fish

An article published in the Science Magazine on December 8, 2016 was presented as a so-called proof of evolution. This article claims that some populations of killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) living in the northeastern coasts of the US have adapted to the severe pollution, which was the result of toxic wastes (aromatic hydrocarbons) mixing with seawater due to recent increases in industrialization, presumably through the process of evolution.  Again, it is alleged that this so-called evolutionary process developed rapidly and was repeated independently in different regions and produced the same results. Obviously in light of scientific facts, these claims of an evolutionary process have no grounds.

The Perfect Distribution of Organelles in the Cell

The basic structural unit of creatures, the cell, is incredibly complex enough to leave people amazed. Just like the existence of a single cell, the harmony and cooperation in the cell is very impressive. As the structure of the cell and systems in it are further investigated and new details are found, this perfect order is seen more clearly.

From Which Creatures Do Drones Draw Inspiration?

The maneuverability of the dragonfly, the firefly's ability to generate light at one hundred percent efficiency, the owl having the most silent flight among all the bird species: The characteristics many creatures have that are similar to these have long fascinated people for centuries. So much so that these characteristics have been an inspiration to particularly scientists, leading to the emergence of a new scientific field.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.