Türkçe


Evolutionary Propaganda in Daily Papers

Evolutionary Propaganda in Scientific Magazines

Evolutionary TV broadcasts

Evolutionary Propaganda on the Internet

Common Darwinist Claims

Evolutionary Propaganda in Other Magazines



Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Presentations on the fact of creation



The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
 

102 / 2004-02-01
Türkçe

In this documentary, which described various species of bird, two evolutionary myths were put forward. In the first it was claimed that birds had developed a broad spectrum of technical tools and means. This claim is based on using the word "developed" instead of "possess" in reference to the existing structures in living things, a tactic which is frequently employed in order to impose the theory of evolution on society without offering the slightest scientific evidence for it. There is no end to the number of examples which can be produced using this fictional narrative. For example, the fact that elephants possess trunks which allow them to break off tree branches and carry them expertly to their mouths, can be transformed into an evolutionary myth by saying, "elephants developed trunks to allow them to break off tree branches and carry them expertly to their mouths." This style of narrative is frequently resorted to in evolutionary propaganda, and is from time to time criticised even by evolutionist scientists as being unscientific. You can find one of our articles dealing with this subject here.

The second evolutionary myth referred to penguins swimming in water resembling dolphins. It then said that this meant the two had undergone the same evolutionary processes, and that in the same way that dolphins had evolved from air breathing land dwelling animals, so penguins had evolved from air breathing flying creatures.

The belief that similarities between living things are the product of evolution is here being offered as evidence of evolution. It is indeed possible to find similarities between penguins and dolphins, just as it is between any two things known to mankind. It is emphasised here that both animals are air breathing swimmers. So far so good. But in the next sentence the conclusion is drawn from that similarity that the two underwent the same process of evolution, without dealing in a logical manner with the signs of intelligent design in penguins and dolphins. This is a false conclusion: The natural or inevitable conclusion to be drawn from the fact that both are air breathing swimming animals is not that they underwent a process of evolution. Both have been created in such a way as to possess complex biological structures, organised in such a way as to perform specific functions. All these structures depend on the plans, in other words on information in their DNA. These features are some of the fundamental features of structures which are the product of intelligent design.

In the same way that there is a similarity between penguins and dolphins, so similarities can frequently be encountered in the products of intelligent design. For example, different makes of computer function with essentially the same types of chips and components. Yet these similarities do not demonstrate that the computers in question evolved from one another in a series of chance developments. That being the case, completely ignoring the features of intelligent design in biological structures and accepting the claim that they came into existence gradually through unconscious, aimless and blind mechanisms such as random mutation and natural selection can only be described as blind faith.

It can be seen that same blind faith dominates also the statement immediately following the claim that dolphins and penguins underwent the same evolutionary process. By saying that in the same way that dolphins evolved from air breathing land dwelling animals, so penguins evolved from air breathing flying creatures, evolution, adopted as an article of faith, is being portrayed as a historical fact. Yet this belief of Animal Planet"s is a mistaken one. Far from revealing any transformation, the fossil record in fact shows that living species emerged suddenly, together with all their flawless bodily systems. Scientific observations and experiments also show that the natural selection and mutation on which the theory of evolution is based can never develop living things in such a way as to endow them with complexity. Our advice to the Animal Planet management is that they reconsider their beliefs and accept that the origin of life is intelligent design.

 

Relevant Article: The Origin of Marine Mammals



The Lie of Human Evolution

Darwinist Propaganda, Darwinist Demagoguery

The Dilemma of Transitional Forms

The Origin of Living Things

Dead End for Molecular Evolution

Creation of the Universe

Lies of Atheism, Materialism and the Philosophy of Evolution

The Deception of Animal Evolution

The Deception of Plant Evolution

Darwinist Fairy Tales on Life

Articles on Darwinist Deception

The Deficient Basis of The Darwinist Propaganda

How the Dajjal died


THE ATLAS OF CREATION RAZED DARWINISM IN EUROPE

The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>


In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.