Türkçe


Evolutionary Propaganda in Daily Papers

Evolutionary Propaganda in Scientific Magazines

Evolutionary TV broadcasts

Evolutionary Propaganda on the Internet

Common Darwinist Claims

Evolutionary Propaganda in Other Magazines



Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Presentations on the fact of creation



The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
 

67 / 2005-03-07
Türkçe

A report dated March 7, 2005, was published on the dailytimes website. The story, titled "110m-year-old sea turtle fossils found," concerned fossil discoveries made by Australian scientists. Paleontologist Ben Kear announced that they had found the fossils of 10 sea turtles dating back around 110 million years, together with a 40 million-year old crocodile fossil. The striking discovery with regard to the sea turtle fossils was that despite being more than 100 million years old they were identical to present-day specimens. The crocodile fossils belonged to a crocodile family that is now extinct. (Like sea turtles, modern-day crocodiles are "living fossils" and no different to specimens from 80 million years ago.)

Let us now ask what kind of evidence these fossils, which have undergone no changes despite all the climatic changes over the last 110 million years, constitute? That these creatures have undergone no evolution, of course. When considered together with other known living fossils from many species, these represent evidence that species have not turned into other species throughout the course of natural history and that they have remained unchanged for millions of years, maintaining all their characteristic features for as long as they have been in existence.

Nonetheless, the dailytimes report carried a number of evolutionist comments by Ben Kear, and stated that research was ongoing into why sea turtles had remained unchanged despite climatic changes. This is an attempt to give the impression that the fossil record actually supports evolution and that the latest discoveries have produced an anomaly in this picture. Let nobody be deceived. These words are based on no scientific evidence whatsoever. They consist of a cloud of fog that a researcher who has adopted evolution as a dogma seeks to disseminate in order to distract people from evidence that undermines evolution.

Ben Kear speaks as if this were the first time he had seen stasis in turtle fossils. The fact is, however, that stasis, state of no change, is the first principle learned about the fossil record by any paleontologist at university, and a striking fact they all know perfectly well. For example, evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould from the Harvard University and a world authority on paleontology, teaches that it is one of two elements of the fossil record that conflict with gradual evolution:

The history of most fossil species includes two features particularly inconsistent with gradualism:

1. Stasis. Most species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the same as when they disappear; morphological change is usually limited and directionless.

2. Sudden appearance. In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and "fully formed." (S.J. Gould, "Evolution"s Erratic Pace," Natural History, vol. 86, May 1977)

 

Tom Kemp, curator of the world famous Oxford University"s Zoological Collections, expresses the principle in these terms:

As is now well known, most fossil species appear instantaneously in the record, persist for some millions of years virtually unchanged, only to disappear abruptly… (Tom S. Kemp, "A Fresh Look At The Fossil Record," New Scientist, vol. 108 (5 December 1985), p. 66)

As a qualified paleontologist, Ben Kear is well aware of these facts. His asking, in amazement, why sea turtles have remained unchanged is one that has to be regarded as artificial. This artificiality stems from the fact that the theory of evolution has been adopted as a dogma in the academic arena, and that it has become essential for researchers to interpret every finding according to that dogma if they are to be able to continue with their careers. Despite all the contrary evidence, a paleontologist feels the need to think and interpret in Darwinist terms, and attracts no criticism as long as he or she does so. Well known paleontologists have openly admitted that they ignored scientific facts for that very reason. Two such, Niles Eldredge and Ian Tattersall (American Museum of Natural History) have written as follows on this subject:

The observation that species are amazingly conservative and static entities throughout long periods of time has all the qualities of the emperor"s new clothes: everyone knew it but preferred to ignore it. Paleontologists, faced with a recalcitrant record obstinately refusing to yield Darwin"s predicted pattern, simply looked the other way. (N. Eldredge, and I. Tattersall, The Myths of Human Evolution, Columbia University Press, 1982, pp. 45-46)

Confessions such as these only began appearing explicitly in the 1980s. In other words, despite their seeing no evidence for it, in the 120 years after Darwin paleontologists behaved as if Darwinian evolution really had taken place.

Kear"s words, which seek to give the impression that all findings actually confirm evolution and that stasis is something surprising, are an extension of this unscientific attitude.

However, as the tale of The Emperor"s New Clothes used as an analogy by Eldredge and Tattersall shows, every lie will eventually be exposed in the face of the true facts.

Neither does the theory of evolution have any escape from this inevitable end. Evolution is a theory invalidated by evidence from many different disciplines of modern science. Yet interpreting the fossil record according to the theory of evolution and creating artificial astonishment by saying things like "I wonder why they have not changed," will not bring the theory of evolution back. If this theory is still doggedly defended by certain circles in the scientific world, that is solely because it continues to exist as a "fossilized" idea in some people"s minds.

The facts that invalidate the theory of evolution are now widely known. The rapid worldwide decline of Darwinism shows that the theory of evolution will soon lose even this fossilized existence in people"s minds. Thus, as in The Emperor"s New Clothes, the truth that every eye sees, but denies, will be openly declared: the fact of Creation. This is a promise made by God, Who reveals in the Qur"an:

""Rather We hurl the truth against falsehood and it cuts right through it and it vanishes clean away! Woe without end for you for what you portray!""  (Qur"an, 21:18)



The Lie of Human Evolution

Darwinist Propaganda, Darwinist Demagoguery

The Dilemma of Transitional Forms

The Origin of Living Things

Dead End for Molecular Evolution

Creation of the Universe

Lies of Atheism, Materialism and the Philosophy of Evolution

The Deception of Animal Evolution

The Deception of Plant Evolution

Darwinist Fairy Tales on Life

Articles on Darwinist Deception

The Deficient Basis of The Darwinist Propaganda

How the Dajjal died


THE ATLAS OF CREATION RAZED DARWINISM IN EUROPE

The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>


In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.