|
| Why the ‘Primitive Neanderthal’ Thesis is Invalid |
|
Neanderthal man, or Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, takes its name from the region in which it was first discovered (the Neander valley near the German city of Dusseldorf in 1856). It had a receding forehead, an unobtrusive jaw and large nose. It is believed to have disappeared, for unknown reasons, some 30,000 years ago. Even though the fact that Neanderthals were actually true human beings is now accepted by many evolutionists, others still tend to portray them as primitive cave-dwellers devoid of abstract thought. The fact is, however, that the many discoveries in recent years regarding the Neanderthal anatomy and culture have shown that this tendency is unfounded and that Neanderthals were a genuine human race. |
| The Claim That Homo Erectus Was A Primitive Species Is Nothing But Prejudice |
|
Homo erectus means ‘upright man.’ These humans possessed an identical skeletal structure to modern man, and like us were capable of walking upright. The reason why Homo erectus is considered ‘primitive’ is the fact that its skull volume (900-1100 cc) is smaller than the modern human average (1400 cc) and its thick eyebrow protrusions. The fact is, however, that there are many human beings today with the same average skull dimensions as Homo erectus, and thick eyebrow protrusions can be found in various races today (as is the case with native Australians). The fact that the anatomical features of Homo erectus can still be seen today demonstrates that it is very definitely not a primitive species. In fact, many evolutionists now say that Homo erectus is a variation of Homo sapiens, in other words a true human being. |
| Why It Is Meaningless For Evolutionists To Use Australopithecus In Their Human Evolution Claims |
|
Evolutionists give the name Australopithecus, meaning ‘southern ape,’ to man’s first alleged ape-like ancestor. In fact, these creatures are nothing but an ancient extinct species of ape. Although various Australopithecus species have been found, only Australopithecus afarensis (represented by ‘Lucy,’ put forward as proof of human evolution when discovered in 1974) is regarded as man’s direct ancestor. Detailed analysis of Australopithecus fossils, however, have revealed that these were an ordinary species of ape. |
| Why does the intelligent behaviour in monkeys not show that man evolved from apes? |
|
Monkeys exhibit various forms of intelligent and social behaviour. Evolutionists point to the way monkeys manage to imitate human behaviour, and then construct similarities. Monkeys are claimed to be the closest animals to man in terms of intelligence, and these similarities are used by evolutionists as the basis for the claim that man evolved from apes. The fact is, however, that the idea that monkey intelligence and behaviour proves evolution is an invalid one, since there are countless creatures in nature which exhibit human-like behaviour despite being far removed from man. |
| Why the propaganda regarding the evolution of human intelligence is untrue |
|
Although human beings have certain biological similarities to other living things, only man has constructed civilisation. Mankind has established universities, hospitals, factories and states, composed music, held Olympic games and ventured into space, and has achieved all of these thanks to his intelligence. Evolutionists maintain that human intelligence assumed its present form by evolving during the period following the separation from his alleged closest relative, the chimpanzee. |
| The Unique Structure of Avian Lung Refutes Evolution |
|
Another factor demonstrating the impossibility of the reptile-bird evolution scenario is the structure of avian lungs, which cannot be accounted for by evolution. |
| The Evolution of the Human Brain: A Blindly Supported Darwinist Myth |
|
Evolutionists claim that man evolved from an ape-like ancestor and that during that imaginary process his brain also grew and developed. According to this view, the growth of the brain is a so-called evolutionary adaptation. Again according to this claim, random mutations and natural selection, bereft of any aim or purpose, are responsible for the alleged evolution of the brain. That which Darwinists most frequently resort to support these claims—based on their own prejudices—is the diagram of the skulls which they set out in order from small to large. A number of scientific sources frequently set this claim and these plans before us. |
| The Complex Design and High Processing Capacity in the Human Brain |
|
There is an exceedingly complex design in the human brain. At the basis of this design lies the fact that are large number of brain cells are linked to one another by a very large number of connections. |
| The Irreducible Complexity of Wings Refutes Evolution |
|
Evolutionists maintain that birds evolved from reptiles. However, there are a number of factors which refute this. One of these is the very different surface structures of the two groups. |
| Why the Idea of Bird Evolution Is No Longer Tenable |
|
Evolutionists maintain that birds are descended from reptiles. There is no evidence for that claim, however. On the contrary, there is a great deal of evidence to show that such an evolution is impossible. |
|
|
1
2 3
4
|
|
THE ATLAS OF CREATION RAZED DARWINISM IN EUROPE
The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>
 |
In order to create, God has no need to design
It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth.
When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)
|
|
