

|

| The Latest Developments Regarding Flores Man |
|
The evolutionist claim that Homo floresiensis represents a separate species to modern-day man continues to retreat in the face of increasing objections. The Times Online, the Internet edition of The Times and The Sunday Times newspapers, summarised the latest developments on the subject in these terms |
| Important Developments Regarding Flores Man (Also Avaliable in Indonesian) |
|
One important figure to announce his views is the Indonesian paleoanthropologist Teuku Jacob. An evolutionist, Jacob is head of the paleoanthropology laboratory at Gadjah Mada University. The institute is known for housing many fossils unearthed within the borders of Indonesia and ascribed to the fictitious evolution of man. In that regard, Jacob’s words are of particular importance in opposing the evolutionist scenario concerning Homo floresiensis. |
| Homo Floresiensis And The Facts Emerging About The Evolution Myth (Also Avaliable in Indonesian) |
|
An excavation team under the leadership of Australian and Indonesian scientists have unearthed the remains of eight human beings of rather short stature and small brain volume in the Liang Bua cave on the Indonesian island of Flores. The fossils were ascribed the name Homo floresiensis (Flores Man) after the island on which they were discovered. |
| National Geographic TV And The History Channel's Neanderthal Errors |
|
Documentaries recently broadcast on National Geographic TV and the History Channel dealt with the Neanderthals, an ancient human race. National Geographic's program was called "Neandertal Enigma," and the History Channel's "The Fate of the Neanderthals." The programs dealt with when and where the Neanderthals had lived and their cultural and anatomical features. |
| Discovery Channel Continues With Its Evolution Deception In The Face Of Scientific Discoveries |
|
A documentary by the name of "The Fate of The Neanderthal Man" was recently screened by Discovery Channel Turkey. Throughout the program there was intense evolutionist propaganda, with Neanderthal Man being referred to as a kind of ape-man. |
| The Articles ''Out Of Africa Again...Again?'' And ''The Multiregional Evolution Of Humans'' |
|
The article 'Out of Africa' was written by Ian Tattersall, curator in the Department of Anthropology of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. In his article he produced the scenario whereby modern man emerged in Africa and replaced other humans by spreading from there to Asia and Europe. |
| ''Who Were The Neanderthals?'' |
|
Prepared by Kate Wong, a Scientific American science writer, this comprised a wide-ranging file on the Neanderthals. Published in Scientific American's special edition, it provided information about the anatomy, culture and behavior of these people who lived in Europe and Western Asia for more than 200,000 years; and comparisons between them and Homo sapiens were made. Space was also devoted to various views held by scientists on whether or not Neanderthal genes are to be found in modern human beings, and an answer was sought to the question of whether these humans were capable of symbolic thought. |
| The Stage And Backstage In The Supposition Of Man's Evolution -Samples From The Scientific The Scientific American |
|
Much of the evolution material confronting us frequently in newspapers and on TV screens is to do with humankind. There is a fair amount of speculation on the transitions of the supposed ancestors of man, the hominoids, in terms of anatomy and culture and the causes of and reasons for human qualities like a large brain and upright walking. Speculating on feeding habits by looking at fossil teeth and how this could have affected the evolution of the species or going by the geographical distribution of discovered fossils, speculating on where on earth mankind originated from and by what ways they spread around is common practice |
| Tell Tales from The National Geographic Channel |
|
The documentary “Humans: Who Are We?” which is currently being broadcast on the National Geographic Channel (NGC), consists of the best-known scenarios of the myth of evolution. The scientific errors and deceptions in the documentary are explained below. |
| The Discovery Channel's Error About The Human Brain |
|
Recently the Discovery Channel showed a documentary titled “Understanding The Amazing Human Brain,” in which the functioning of the brain was investigated. Brain operations on some patients, the various brain areas’ functions as well as the awesome processing power of the brain were being examined. The Discovery Channel contended that the brain’s amazing design was “the zenith of millions of years of continuous evolution.” In this article we will show the Discovery Channel’s faults with regards to the human brain. |
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 10
|
|


THE ATLAS OF CREATION RAZED DARWINISM IN EUROPE
The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>
 |

In order to create, God has no need to design
It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth.
When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)
|
|